249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28734892)
21. RNA-Seq: revelation of the messengers.
Van Verk MC; Hickman R; Pieterse CM; Van Wees SC
Trends Plant Sci; 2013 Apr; 18(4):175-9. PubMed ID: 23481128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparing bioinformatic gene expression profiling methods: microarray and RNA-Seq.
Mantione KJ; Kream RM; Kuzelova H; Ptacek R; Raboch J; Samuel JM; Stefano GB
Med Sci Monit Basic Res; 2014 Aug; 20():138-42. PubMed ID: 25149683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. RNA-Seq provides new insights in the transcriptome responses induced by the carcinogen benzo[a]pyrene.
van Delft J; Gaj S; Lienhard M; Albrecht MW; Kirpiy A; Brauers K; Claessen S; Lizarraga D; Lehrach H; Herwig R; Kleinjans J
Toxicol Sci; 2012 Dec; 130(2):427-39. PubMed ID: 22889811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Differential Expression Analysis of RNA-seq Reads: Overview, Taxonomy, and Tools.
Chowdhury HA; Bhattacharyya DK; Kalita JK
IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2020; 17(2):566-586. PubMed ID: 30281477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. RNA sequencing and transcriptome arrays analyses show opposing results for alternative splicing in patient derived samples.
Nazarov PV; Muller A; Kaoma T; Nicot N; Maximo C; Birembaut P; Tran NL; Dittmar G; Vallar L
BMC Genomics; 2017 Jun; 18(1):443. PubMed ID: 28587590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Genes, behavior and next-generation RNA sequencing.
Hitzemann R; Bottomly D; Darakjian P; Walter N; Iancu O; Searles R; Wilmot B; McWeeney S
Genes Brain Behav; 2013 Feb; 12(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 23194347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of RNA-seq and microarray-based models for clinical endpoint prediction.
Zhang W; Yu Y; Hertwig F; Thierry-Mieg J; Zhang W; Thierry-Mieg D; Wang J; Furlanello C; Devanarayan V; Cheng J; Deng Y; Hero B; Hong H; Jia M; Li L; Lin SM; Nikolsky Y; Oberthuer A; Qing T; Su Z; Volland R; Wang C; Wang MD; Ai J; Albanese D; Asgharzadeh S; Avigad S; Bao W; Bessarabova M; Brilliant MH; Brors B; Chierici M; Chu TM; Zhang J; Grundy RG; He MM; Hebbring S; Kaufman HL; Lababidi S; Lancashire LJ; Li Y; Lu XX; Luo H; Ma X; Ning B; Noguera R; Peifer M; Phan JH; Roels F; Rosswog C; Shao S; Shen J; Theissen J; Tonini GP; Vandesompele J; Wu PY; Xiao W; Xu J; Xu W; Xuan J; Yang Y; Ye Z; Dong Z; Zhang KK; Yin Y; Zhao C; Zheng Y; Wolfinger RD; Shi T; Malkas LH; Berthold F; Wang J; Tong W; Shi L; Peng Z; Fischer M
Genome Biol; 2015 Jun; 16(1):133. PubMed ID: 26109056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Improving Gene-Set Enrichment Analysis of RNA-Seq Data with Small Replicates.
Yoon S; Kim SY; Nam D
PLoS One; 2016; 11(11):e0165919. PubMed ID: 27829002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Differential correlation for sequencing data.
Siska C; Kechris K
BMC Res Notes; 2017 Jan; 10(1):54. PubMed ID: 28103954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Microarrays, deep sequencing and the true measure of the transcriptome.
Malone JH; Oliver B
BMC Biol; 2011 May; 9():34. PubMed ID: 21627854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Maize gene atlas developed by RNA sequencing and comparative evaluation of transcriptomes based on RNA sequencing and microarrays.
Sekhon RS; Briskine R; Hirsch CN; Myers CL; Springer NM; Buell CR; de Leon N; Kaeppler SM
PLoS One; 2013; 8(4):e61005. PubMed ID: 23637782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. High-throughput RNA-seq for allelic or locus-specific expression analysis in Arabidopsis-related species, hybrids, and allotetraploids.
Ng DW; Shi X; Nah G; Chen ZJ
Methods Mol Biol; 2014; 1112():33-48. PubMed ID: 24478006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Whole-Transcriptome profiling of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded renal cell carcinoma by RNA-seq.
Li P; Conley A; Zhang H; Kim HL
BMC Genomics; 2014 Dec; 15(1):1087. PubMed ID: 25495041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Circulating Messenger RNA Profiling with Microarray and Next-generation Sequencing: Cross-platform Comparison.
Shih CL; Luo JD; Chang JW; Chen TL; Chien YT; Yu CJ; Chiou CC
Cancer Genomics Proteomics; 2015; 12(5):223-30. PubMed ID: 26417025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. RNA-seq and microarray complement each other in transcriptome profiling.
Kogenaru S; Qing Y; Guo Y; Wang N
BMC Genomics; 2012 Nov; 13():629. PubMed ID: 23153100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Using Synthetic Mouse Spike-In Transcripts to Evaluate RNA-Seq Analysis Tools.
Leshkowitz D; Feldmesser E; Friedlander G; Jona G; Ainbinder E; Parmet Y; Horn-Saban S
PLoS One; 2016; 11(4):e0153782. PubMed ID: 27100792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A nested parallel experiment demonstrates differences in intensity-dependence between RNA-seq and microarrays.
Robinson DG; Wang JY; Storey JD
Nucleic Acids Res; 2015 Nov; 43(20):e131. PubMed ID: 26130709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Characterizing and annotating the genome using RNA-seq data.
Chen G; Shi T; Shi L
Sci China Life Sci; 2017 Feb; 60(2):116-125. PubMed ID: 27294835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Detection of generic differential RNA processing events from RNA-seq data.
Tran Vdu T; Souiai O; Romero-Barrios N; Crespi M; Gautheret D
RNA Biol; 2016; 13(1):59-67. PubMed ID: 26849165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The importance of study design for detecting differentially abundant features in high-throughput experiments.
Luo H; Li J; Chia BK; Robson P; Nagarajan N
Genome Biol; 2014 Dec; 15(12):527. PubMed ID: 25517037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
