1770 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28734971)
1. Robotic Assistance Confers Ambidexterity to Laparoscopic Surgeons.
Choussein S; Srouji SS; Farland LV; Wietsma A; Missmer SA; Hollis M; Yu RN; Pozner CN; Gargiulo AR
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 25(1):76-83. PubMed ID: 28734971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of precision and speed in laparoscopic and robot-assisted surgical task performance.
Zihni A; Gerull WD; Cavallo JA; Ge T; Ray S; Chiu J; Brunt LM; Awad MM
J Surg Res; 2018 Mar; 223():29-33. PubMed ID: 29433882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Combining of ETHOS Operating Ergonomic Platform, Three-dimensional Laparoscopic Camera, and Radius Surgical System Manipulators Improves Ergonomy in Urologic Laparoscopy: Comparison with Conventional Laparoscopy and da Vinci in a Pelvi Trainer.
Tokas T; Gözen AS; Avgeris M; Tschada A; Fiedler M; Klein J; Rassweiler J
Eur Urol Focus; 2017 Oct; 3(4-5):413-420. PubMed ID: 28753821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Skills in minimally invasive and open surgery show limited transferability to robotic surgery: results from a prospective study.
Kowalewski KF; Schmidt MW; Proctor T; Pohl M; Wennberg E; Karadza E; Romero P; Kenngott HG; Müller-Stich BP; Nickel F
Surg Endosc; 2018 Apr; 32(4):1656-1667. PubMed ID: 29435749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. 3D straight-stick laparoscopy versus 3D robotics for task performance in novice surgeons: a randomised crossover trial.
Shakir F; Jan H; Kent A
Surg Endosc; 2016 Dec; 30(12):5380-5387. PubMed ID: 27059971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Proficiency training on a virtual reality robotic surgical skills curriculum.
Bric J; Connolly M; Kastenmeier A; Goldblatt M; Gould JC
Surg Endosc; 2014 Dec; 28(12):3343-8. PubMed ID: 24946742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Transferability of Virtual Reality, Simulation-Based, Robotic Suturing Skills to a Live Porcine Model in Novice Surgeons: A Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.
Vargas MV; Moawad G; Denny K; Happ L; Misa NY; Margulies S; Opoku-Anane J; Abi Khalil E; Marfori C
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(3):420-425. PubMed ID: 28027975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validation of a Novel Inverted Peg Transfer Task: Advancing Beyond the Regular Peg Transfer Task for Surgical Simulation-Based Assessment.
Abdelrahman AM; Yu D; Lowndes BR; Buckarma EH; Gas BL; Farley DR; Bingener J; Hallbeck MS
J Surg Educ; 2018; 75(3):836-843. PubMed ID: 29037821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Robotic skills can be aided by laparoscopic training.
Davila DG; Helm MC; Frelich MJ; Gould JC; Goldblatt MI
Surg Endosc; 2018 Jun; 32(6):2683-2688. PubMed ID: 29214515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The da vinci robot system eliminates multispecialty surgical trainees' hand dominance in open and robotic surgical settings.
Badalato GM; Shapiro E; Rothberg MB; Bergman A; RoyChoudhury A; Korets R; Patel T; Badani KK
JSLS; 2014; 18(3):. PubMed ID: 25392647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of robotic assistance on mental workload and cognitive performance of surgical trainees performing a complex minimally invasive suturing task.
Lau E; Alkhamesi NA; Schlachta CM
Surg Endosc; 2020 Jun; 34(6):2551-2559. PubMed ID: 31482359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Training benchmarks based on validated composite scores for the RobotiX robot-assisted surgery simulator on basic tasks.
Leijte E; Claassen L; Arts E; de Blaauw I; Rosman C; Botden SMBI
J Robot Surg; 2021 Feb; 15(1):69-79. PubMed ID: 32314094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Initial experience using a robotic-driven laparoscopic needle holder with ergonomic handle: assessment of surgeons' task performance and ergonomics.
Sánchez-Margallo JA; Sánchez-Margallo FM
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2017 Dec; 12(12):2069-2077. PubMed ID: 28695479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Comparison of Robotic Simulation Performance on Basic Virtual Reality Skills: Simulator Subjective Versus Objective Assessment Tools.
Dubin AK; Smith R; Julian D; Tanaka A; Mattingly P
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(7):1184-1189. PubMed ID: 28757439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Manual Ambidexterity Predicts Robotic Surgical Proficiency.
Yang JY; Son YG; Kim TH; Park JH; Huh YJ; Suh YS; Kong SH; Lee HJ; Kim S; Yang HK
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2015 Dec; 25(12):1009-18. PubMed ID: 26673533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Laparoscopic and robotic skills are transferable in a simulation setting: a randomized controlled trial.
Thomaier L; Orlando M; Abernethy M; Paka C; Chen CCG
Surg Endosc; 2017 Aug; 31(8):3279-3285. PubMed ID: 27924388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validity evidence for procedural competency in virtual reality robotic simulation, establishing a credible pass/fail standard for the vaginal cuff closure procedure.
Hovgaard LH; Andersen SAW; Konge L; Dalsgaard T; Larsen CR
Surg Endosc; 2018 Oct; 32(10):4200-4208. PubMed ID: 29603003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Extent of innate dexterity and ambidexterity across handedness and gender: Implications for training in laparoscopic surgery.
Elneel FH; Carter F; Tang B; Cuschieri A
Surg Endosc; 2008 Jan; 22(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 17965919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Laparoscopic Ambidexterity in Left-Handed Trainees.
Nagaraj MB; AbdelFattah KR; Farr DE
J Surg Res; 2022 Jul; 275():203-207. PubMed ID: 35305486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills Performance: 2D Versus 3D Vision and Classic Instrument Versus New Hand-Held Robotic Device for Laparoscopy.
Leite M; Carvalho AF; Costa P; Pereira R; Moreira A; Rodrigues N; Laureano S; Correia-Pinto J; Vilaça JL; Leão P
Surg Innov; 2016 Feb; 23(1):52-61. PubMed ID: 25994623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
