These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28735084)

  • 1. A category-specific top-down attentional set can affect the neural responses outside the current focus of attention.
    Jiang Y; Wu X; Gao X
    Neurosci Lett; 2017 Oct; 659():80-85. PubMed ID: 28735084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bringing color to emotion: The influence of color on attentional bias to briefly presented emotional images.
    Bekhtereva V; Müller MM
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2017 Oct; 17(5):1028-1047. PubMed ID: 28699142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Neural responses to target features outside a search array are enhanced during conjunction but not unique-feature search.
    Painter DR; Dux PE; Travis SL; Mattingley JB
    J Neurosci; 2014 Feb; 34(9):3390-401. PubMed ID: 24573295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Category-based attentional capture can be influenced by color- and shape-dimensions independently in the conjunction search task.
    Wu X; Wang X; Saab R; Jiang Y
    Psychophysiology; 2020 Apr; 57(4):e13526. PubMed ID: 31953842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The role of top-down spatial attention in contingent attentional capture.
    Huang W; Su Y; Zhen Y; Qu Z
    Psychophysiology; 2016 May; 53(5):650-62. PubMed ID: 26879628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. All set, indeed! N2pc components reveal simultaneous attentional control settings for multiple target colors.
    Grubert A; Eimer M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1215-30. PubMed ID: 26950386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Color categories affect pre-attentive color perception.
    Clifford A; Holmes A; Davies IR; Franklin A
    Biol Psychol; 2010 Oct; 85(2):275-82. PubMed ID: 20674661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Time Course of Target Template Activation Processes during Preparation for Visual Search.
    Grubert A; Eimer M
    J Neurosci; 2018 Oct; 38(44):9527-9538. PubMed ID: 30242053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. What top-down task sets do for us: an ERP study on the benefits of advance preparation in visual search.
    Eimer M; Kiss M; Nicholas S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Dec; 37(6):1758-66. PubMed ID: 21688941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Electrophysiological revelations of trial history effects in a color oddball search task.
    Shin E; Chong SC
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Dec; 53(12):1878-1888. PubMed ID: 27699796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Brain structures involved in visual search in the presence and absence of color singletons.
    Talsma D; Coe B; Munoz DP; Theeuwes J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Apr; 22(4):761-74. PubMed ID: 19309291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Qualitative differences in the guidance of attention during single-color and multiple-color visual search: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.
    Grubert A; Eimer M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Oct; 39(5):1433-42. PubMed ID: 23244044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Global Enhancement but Local Suppression in Feature-based Attention.
    Forschack N; Andersen SK; Müller MM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2017 Apr; 29(4):619-627. PubMed ID: 27897668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of feature-selective and spatial attention at different stages of visual processing.
    Andersen SK; Fuchs S; Müller MM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Jan; 23(1):238-46. PubMed ID: 19702461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Taking a closer look at visual search: Just how feature-agnostic is singleton detection mode?
    Harris AM; Jacoby O; Remington RW; Travis SL; Mattingley JB
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Apr; 81(3):654-665. PubMed ID: 30603988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The initial stage of visual selection is controlled by top-down task set: new ERP evidence.
    Ansorge U; Kiss M; Worschech F; Eimer M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Jan; 73(1):113-22. PubMed ID: 21258913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Causal involvement of visual area MT in global feature-based enhancement but not contingent attentional capture.
    Painter DR; Dux PE; Mattingley JB
    Neuroimage; 2015 Sep; 118():90-102. PubMed ID: 26067347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Top-Down Attention Is Limited Within but Not Between Feature Dimensions.
    Adamian N; Slaustaite E; Andersen SK
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2019 Aug; 31(8):1173-1183. PubMed ID: 30794058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Attentional bias to affective faces and complex IAPS images in early visual cortex follows emotional cue extraction.
    Bekhtereva V; Craddock M; Müller MM
    Neuroimage; 2015 May; 112():254-266. PubMed ID: 25818682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Neural Dynamics of Attentional Selection in Natural Scenes.
    Kaiser D; Oosterhof NN; Peelen MV
    J Neurosci; 2016 Oct; 36(41):10522-10528. PubMed ID: 27733605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.