245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28736249)
1. Identifying intermediate-risk candidates for active surveillance of prostate cancer.
Savdie R; Aning J; So AI; Black PC; Gleave ME; Goldenberg SL
Urol Oncol; 2017 Oct; 35(10):605.e1-605.e8. PubMed ID: 28736249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. National Comprehensive Cancer Network® Favorable Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer-Is Active Surveillance Appropriate?
Aghazadeh MA; Frankel J; Belanger M; McLaughlin T; Tortora J; Staff I; Wagner JR
J Urol; 2018 May; 199(5):1196-1201. PubMed ID: 29288120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Decipher identifies men with otherwise clinically favorable-intermediate risk disease who may not be good candidates for active surveillance.
Herlemann A; Huang HC; Alam R; Tosoian JJ; Kim HL; Klein EA; Simko JP; Chan JM; Lane BR; Davis JW; Davicioni E; Feng FY; McCue P; Kim H; Den RB; Bismar TA; Carroll PR; Cooperberg MR
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2020 Mar; 23(1):136-143. PubMed ID: 31455846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Performance characteristics of prostate-specific antigen density and biopsy core details to predict oncological outcome in patients with intermediate to high-risk prostate cancer underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Yashi M; Nukui A; Tokura Y; Takei K; Suzuki I; Sakamoto K; Yuki H; Kambara T; Betsunoh H; Abe H; Fukabori Y; Nakazato Y; Kaji Y; Kamai T
BMC Urol; 2017 Jun; 17(1):47. PubMed ID: 28645325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Outcomes of initially expectantly managed patients with low or intermediate risk screen-detected localized prostate cancer.
Bul M; van den Bergh RC; Zhu X; Rannikko A; Vasarainen H; Bangma CH; Schröder FH; Roobol MJ
BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11):1672-7. PubMed ID: 22928973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation of the Decipher Test for predicting adverse pathology in candidates for prostate cancer active surveillance.
Kim HL; Li P; Huang HC; Deheshi S; Marti T; Knudsen B; Abou-Ouf H; Alam R; Lotan TL; Lam LLC; du Plessis M; Davicioni E; Fleshner N; Lane BR; Ross AE; Davis JW; Mohler JL; Trock BJ; Klein EA; Tosoian JJ; Hyndman ME; Bismar TA
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2019 Sep; 22(3):399-405. PubMed ID: 30542054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Risk Group and Death From Prostate Cancer: Implications for Active Surveillance in Men With Favorable Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer.
Raldow AC; Zhang D; Chen MH; Braccioforte MH; Moran BJ; D'Amico AV
JAMA Oncol; 2015 Jun; 1(3):334-40. PubMed ID: 26181182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biopsy features associated with prostate cancer progression in active surveillance patients: comparison of three statistical models.
Iremashvili V; Manoharan M; Rosenberg DL; Soloway MS
BJU Int; 2013 Apr; 111(4):574-9. PubMed ID: 22564446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Downgrading of grade group 2 intermediate-risk prostate cancer from biopsy to radical prostatectomy: Comparison of outcomes and predictors to identify potential candidates for active surveillance.
Su ZT; Patel HD; Epstein JI; Pavlovich CP; Allaf ME
Cancer; 2020 Apr; 126(8):1632-1639. PubMed ID: 32031685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Improving the Stratification of Patients With Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer.
Stolzenbach LF; Nocera L; Collà-Ruvolo C; Tian Z; Knipper S; Maurer T; Tilki D; Graefen M; Karakiewicz PI
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2021 Apr; 19(2):e120-e128. PubMed ID: 33358891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Genomic Scores are Independent of Disease Volume in Men with Favorable Risk Prostate Cancer: Implications for Choosing Men for Active Surveillance.
Nyame YA; Grimberg DC; Greene DJ; Gupta K; Kartha GK; Berglund R; Gong M; Stephenson AJ; Magi-Galluzzi C; Klein EA
J Urol; 2018 Feb; 199(2):438-444. PubMed ID: 28941920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of Oncological Outcomes After Radical Prostatectomy According to Preoperative and Postoperative Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment Scores: Results from a Large, Two-center Experience.
Leyh-Bannurah SR; Dell'Oglio P; Zaffuto E; Briganti A; Schiffmann J; Pompe RS; Tilki D; Heinzer H; Graefen M; Karakiewicz PI; Budäus L
Eur Urol Focus; 2019 Jul; 5(4):568-576. PubMed ID: 29129756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A negative confirmatory biopsy among men on active surveillance for prostate cancer does not protect them from histologic grade progression.
Wong LM; Alibhai SM; Trottier G; Timilshina N; Van der Kwast T; Zlotta A; Lawrentschuk N; Kulkarni G; Hamilton R; Ferrara S; Margel D; Trachtenberg J; Jewett MA; Toi A; Evans A; Fleshner NE; Finelli A
Eur Urol; 2014 Sep; 66(3):406-13. PubMed ID: 23664820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Predictors of pathologic progression on biopsy among men on active surveillance for localized prostate cancer: the value of the pattern of surveillance biopsies.
Cary KC; Cowan JE; Sanford M; Shinohara K; Perez N; Chan JM; Meng MV; Carroll PR
Eur Urol; 2014 Aug; 66(2):337-42. PubMed ID: 24035632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Improved decision making in intermediate-risk prostate cancer: a multicenter study on pathologic and oncologic outcomes after radical prostatectomy.
Beauval JB; Ploussard G; Cabarrou B; Roumiguié M; Ouzzane A; Gas J; Goujon A; Marcq G; Mathieu R; Vincendeau S; Cathelineau X; Mongiat-Artus P; Salomon L; Soulié M; Méjean A; de La Taille A; Rouprêt M; Rozet F;
World J Urol; 2017 Aug; 35(8):1191-1197. PubMed ID: 27987030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Obesity is associated with risk of progression for low-risk prostate cancers managed expectantly.
Bhindi B; Kulkarni GS; Finelli A; Alibhai SM; Hamilton RJ; Toi A; van der Kwast TH; Evans A; Hersey K; Jewett MA; Zlotta AR; Trachtenberg J; Fleshner NE
Eur Urol; 2014 Nov; 66(5):841-8. PubMed ID: 24954793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Predictors of pathological progression among men with localized prostate cancer undergoing active surveillance: a sub-analysis of the REDEEM study.
Margel D; Nandy I; Wilson TH; Castro R; Fleshner N
J Urol; 2013 Dec; 190(6):2039-45. PubMed ID: 23820059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Regular transition zone biopsy during active surveillance for prostate cancer may improve detection of pathological progression.
Wong LM; Toi A; Van der Kwast T; Trottier G; Alibhai SM; Timilshina N; Evans A; Zlotta A; Fleshner N; Finelli A
J Urol; 2014 Oct; 192(4):1088-93. PubMed ID: 24742593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Genomic Classifier for Guiding Treatment of Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancers to Dose-Escalated Image Guided Radiation Therapy Without Hormone Therapy.
Berlin A; Murgic J; Hosni A; Pintilie M; Salcedo A; Fraser M; Kamel-Reid S; Zhang J; Wang Q; Ch'ng C; Deheshi S; Davicioni E; van der Kwast T; Boutros PC; Bristow RG; Chua MLK
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2019 Jan; 103(1):84-91. PubMed ID: 30170099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A new risk classification system for therapeutic decision making with intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients undergoing dose-escalated external-beam radiation therapy.
Zumsteg ZS; Spratt DE; Pei I; Zhang Z; Yamada Y; Kollmeier M; Zelefsky MJ
Eur Urol; 2013 Dec; 64(6):895-902. PubMed ID: 23541457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
