These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

318 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28736356)

  • 101. Effect of cervical spine motion on displacement of posterolateral annulus fibrosus in cervical spondylotic radiculopathy with contained posterolateral disc herniation: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Ye LQ; Chen C; Liu YH; Li Z; Lu GL
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2022 Dec; 17(1):548. PubMed ID: 36528646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 102. Biomechanical evaluation of the kinematics of the cadaver lumbar spine following disc replacement with the ProDisc-L prosthesis.
    Demetropoulos CK; Sengupta DK; Knaub MA; Wiater BP; Abjornson C; Truumees E; Herkowitz HN
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Jan; 35(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 20042953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 103. Total disc replacement positioning affects facet contact forces and vertebral body strains.
    Rundell SA; Auerbach JD; Balderston RA; Kurtz SM
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Nov; 33(23):2510-7. PubMed ID: 18978591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 104. [Finite Element Analysis of Biomechanics of Cervical Spine after Dynamic Cervical Implant Surgery].
    Wang C; Zhao G; Bai L; Chen N; Song Y; Chen E; Zhao Q
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2016 Aug; 33(4):645-51. PubMed ID: 29714901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 105. Comparison of the effects of bilateral posterior dynamic and rigid fixation devices on the loads in the lumbar spine: a finite element analysis.
    Rohlmann A; Burra NK; Zander T; Bergmann G
    Eur Spine J; 2007 Aug; 16(8):1223-31. PubMed ID: 17206401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 106. Unilateral cervical facet dislocation: a biomechanical study of several constructs including unilateral lateral mass fixation supplemented by an interspinous cable.
    Riesenburger RI; Potluri T; Kulkarni N; Lavelle W; Roguski M; Goel VK; Benzel EC
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Mar; 16(3):251-6. PubMed ID: 22150239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 107. Primary and coupled motions after cervical total disc replacement using a compressible six-degree-of-freedom prosthesis.
    Patwardhan AG; Tzermiadianos MN; Tsitsopoulos PP; Voronov LI; Renner SM; Reo ML; Carandang G; Ritter-Lang K; Havey RM
    Eur Spine J; 2012 Jun; 21 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S618-29. PubMed ID: 20865285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 108. The effect of different design concepts in lumbar total disc arthroplasty on the range of motion, facet joint forces and instantaneous center of rotation of a L4-5 segment.
    Schmidt H; Midderhoff S; Adkins K; Wilke HJ
    Eur Spine J; 2009 Nov; 18(11):1695-1705. PubMed ID: 19763638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 109. Multilevel cervical fusion and its effect on disc degeneration and osteophyte formation.
    Lopez-Espina CG; Amirouche F; Havalad V
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Apr; 31(9):972-8. PubMed ID: 16641772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 110. Effect of spacer diameter of the Dynesys dynamic stabilization system on the biomechanics of the lumbar spine: a finite element analysis.
    Shih SL; Chen CS; Lin HM; Huang LY; Liu CL; Huang CH; Cheng CK
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2012 Jul; 25(5):E140-9. PubMed ID: 22744611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 111. Finite element analysis of cervical facetectomy.
    Voo LM; Kumaresan S; Yoganandan N; Pintar FA; Cusick JF
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1997 May; 22(9):964-9. PubMed ID: 9152445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 112. Cervical spine morphology and ligament property variations: A finite element study of their influence on sagittal bending characteristics.
    John JD; Saravana Kumar G; Yoganandan N
    J Biomech; 2019 Mar; 85():18-26. PubMed ID: 30704760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 113. In vitro biomechanical comparison after fixed- and mobile-core artificial cervical disc replacement versus fusion.
    Lou J; Li Y; Wang B; Meng Y; Wu T; Liu H
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Oct; 96(41):e8291. PubMed ID: 29019902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 114. Biomechanical Effect of Different Graft Heights on Adjacent Segment and Graft Segment Following C4/C5 Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Finite Element Analysis.
    Zhang Y; Zhou J; Guo X; Cai Z; Liu H; Xue Y
    Med Sci Monit; 2019 Jun; 25():4169-4175. PubMed ID: 31163019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 115. Spinal facet joint biomechanics and mechanotransduction in normal, injury and degenerative conditions.
    Jaumard NV; Welch WC; Winkelstein BA
    J Biomech Eng; 2011 Jul; 133(7):071010. PubMed ID: 21823749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 116. [Construction and analysis of a finite element model of human L4-5 lumbar segment].
    Yan W; Zhao G; Fang X; Guo H; Ma T; Tu Y
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2014 Jun; 31(3):612-8. PubMed ID: 25219245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 117. Influence of morphological variations on cervical spine segmental responses from inertial loading.
    John JD; Yoganandan N; Arun MWJ; Saravana Kumar G
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Feb; 19(sup1):S29-S36. PubMed ID: 29584503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 118. In silico evaluation of a new composite disc substitute with a L3-L5 lumbar spine finite element model.
    Noailly J; Ambrosio L; Elizabeth Tanner K; Planell JA; Lacroix D
    Eur Spine J; 2012 Jun; 21 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S675-87. PubMed ID: 21380572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 119. [Biomechanical analysis of different ProDisc-C arthroplasty design parameters after implanted: a numerical sensitivity study based on finite element method].
    Tang Q; Mo Z; Yao J; Li Q; Du C; Wang L; Fan Y
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2014 Dec; 31(6):1265-71. PubMed ID: 25868242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 120. Cervical disc prostheses need a variable center of rotation for flexion / extension below disc level, plus a separate COR for lateral bending above disc level to more closely replicate in-vivo motion: MRI-based biomechanical in-vivo study.
    Muhlbauer MK; Tomasch E; Sinz W; Trattnig S; Steffan H
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2022 Mar; 23(1):227. PubMed ID: 35260131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.