These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

276 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 287364)

  • 1. Noise-induced hearing loss and the comprehension of speech in noise.
    Quist-Hanssen S; Thorud E; Aasand G
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1979; 360():90-5. PubMed ID: 287364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Speech-in-noise screening tests by internet, part 1: test evaluation for noise-induced hearing loss identification.
    Leensen MC; de Laat JA; Dreschler WA
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Nov; 50(11):823-34. PubMed ID: 21988504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Speech-in-noise screening tests by internet, part 2: improving test sensitivity for noise-induced hearing loss.
    Leensen MC; de Laat JA; Snik AF; Dreschler WA
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Nov; 50(11):835-48. PubMed ID: 21970351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Monosyllabic word recognition at higher-than-normal speech and noise levels.
    Studebaker GA; Sherbecoe RL; McDaniel DM; Gwaltney CA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Apr; 105(4):2431-44. PubMed ID: 10212424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A signal-to-noise ratio model for the speech-reception threshold of the hearing impaired.
    Plomp R
    J Speech Hear Res; 1986 Jun; 29(2):146-54. PubMed ID: 3724108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Speech reception in quiet and in noisy conditions by individuals with noise-induced hearing loss in relation to their tone audiogram.
    Smoorenburg GF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jan; 91(1):421-37. PubMed ID: 1737889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Speech tests: application in individuals with noise induced hearing loss].
    Moreira RR; Ferreira Junior M
    Pro Fono; 2004; 16(3):293-300. PubMed ID: 15609584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of recognition performances in speech-spectrum noise by listeners with normal hearing on PB-50, CID W-22, NU-6, W-1 spondaic words, and monosyllabic digits spoken by the same speaker.
    Wilson RH; McArdle R; Roberts H
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2008 Jun; 19(6):496-506. PubMed ID: 19253782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Clinical study of speech understanding in noise].
    Tremblay C; Picard M; Barbarosie T; Banville R
    Audiology; 1991; 30(4):212-40. PubMed ID: 1755750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The applicability of a speech-in-noise screening test in occupational hearing conservation.
    Leensen MC; Dreschler WA
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Jul; 52(7):455-65. PubMed ID: 23772828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Do you hear the noise? The German matrix sentence test with a fixed noise level in subjects with normal hearing and hearing impairment.
    Wardenga N; Batsoulis C; Wagener KC; Brand T; Lenarz T; Maier H
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():71-9. PubMed ID: 26555195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Auditory detection, discrimination and speech processing in ageing, noise-sensitive and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Abel SM; Krever EM; Alberti PW
    Scand Audiol; 1990; 19(1):43-54. PubMed ID: 2336540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Laboratory evaluation of an optimised internet-based speech-in-noise test for occupational high-frequency hearing loss screening: Occupational Earcheck.
    Sheikh Rashid M; Leensen MCJ; de Laat JAPM; Dreschler WA
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Nov; 56(11):844-853. PubMed ID: 28587489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of noise on word discrimination by subjects with impaired hearing, compared with those with normal hearing.
    Pekkarinen E; Salmivalli A; Suonpää J
    Scand Audiol; 1990; 19(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 2336538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Some aspects of methodology in speech audiometry.
    Hagerman B
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1984; 21():1-25. PubMed ID: 6589731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Speech-in-noise screening tests by internet, part 3: test sensitivity for uncontrolled parameters in domestic usage.
    Leensen MC; Dreschler WA
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Oct; 52(10):658-69. PubMed ID: 23819619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On the limited transfer of information with noise-induced hearing loss.
    Smoorenburg GF
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990; 469():38-46. PubMed ID: 2356737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Development and validation of the Speech Reception in Noise (SPRINT) Test.
    Brungart DS; Walden B; Cord M; Phatak S; Theodoroff SM; Griest S; Grant KW
    Hear Res; 2017 Jun; 349():90-97. PubMed ID: 28111321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of noise-induced hearing loss on the intelligibility of speech in noise.
    Smoorenburg GF; de Laat JA; Plomp R
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1982; 16():123-33. PubMed ID: 6962506
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Göttingen sentence in noise for different audiogram classes].
    Thiele C; Sukowksi H; Lenarz T; Lesinski-Schiedat A
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2012 Dec; 91(12):782-8. PubMed ID: 22234848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.