These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

276 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 287364)

  • 21. Evaluation of an internet-based speech-in-noise screening test for school-age children.
    Sheikh Rashid M; Dreschler WA; de Laat JAPM
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Dec; 56(12):967-975. PubMed ID: 28936876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Study the impacts of diagnosis on occupational noise-induced deafness after bring into the different high frequency hearing threshold weighted value].
    Xue LJ; Yang AC; Chen H; Huang WX; Guo JJ; Liang XY; Chen ZQ; Zheng QL
    Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2017 Nov; 35(11):812-817. PubMed ID: 29316750
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. An Italian matrix sentence test for the evaluation of speech intelligibility in noise.
    Puglisi GE; Warzybok A; Hochmuth S; Visentin C; Astolfi A; Prodi N; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():44-50. PubMed ID: 26371592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The effect of masking by noise on word discrimination scores in listeners with normal hearing and with noise-induced hearing loss.
    Chung DY; Mack B
    Scand Audiol; 1979; 8(3):139-43. PubMed ID: 515696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Intelligibility of Dutch CVC syllables and sentences for listeners with normal hearing and with three types of hearing impairment.
    Bosman AJ; Smoorenburg GF
    Audiology; 1995; 34(5):260-84. PubMed ID: 8837785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6 in multi-talker babble: a preliminary report.
    Wilson RH; Strouse A
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2002; 39(1):105-13. PubMed ID: 11926322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Analysis of Early Biomarkers Associated With Noise-Induced Hearing Loss Among Shipyard Workers.
    Jiang Z; Wang J; Feng Y; Sun D; Zhang X; Shi H; Wang J; Salvi R; Wang H; Yin S
    JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Sep; 4(9):e2124100. PubMed ID: 34477849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Psychoacoustic correlates of susceptibility to auditory fatigue.
    Mustain WD; Schoeny ZG
    Ear Hear; 1980; 1(2):91-8. PubMed ID: 7372023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Exploring the sensitivity of speech-in-noise tests for noise-induced hearing loss.
    Jansen S; Luts H; Dejonckere P; van Wieringen A; Wouters J
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Mar; 53(3):199-205. PubMed ID: 24237040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Development of the Russian matrix sentence test.
    Warzybok A; Zokoll M; Wardenga N; Ozimek E; Boboshko M; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():35-43. PubMed ID: 25843088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Estimates of basilar-membrane nonlinearity effects on masking of tones and speech.
    Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB
    Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):2-17. PubMed ID: 17204895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Impaired word recognition in noise by patients with noise-induced cochlear hearing loss: contribution of temporal resolution defect.
    Phillips DP; Rappaport JM; Gulliver JM
    Am J Otol; 1994 Sep; 15(5):679-86. PubMed ID: 8572072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Binaural masking level difference for speech signals in noise.
    Johansson MS; Arlinger SD
    Int J Audiol; 2002 Jul; 41(5):279-84. PubMed ID: 12166687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
    Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
    Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Quiet and masked brief-tone audiometry in subjects with normal hearing and with noise-induced hearing loss.
    Chung DY; Smith F
    Scand Audiol; 1980; 9(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 7444319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Predicting hearing thresholds in occupational noise-induced hearing loss by auditory steady state responses.
    Attias J; Karawani H; Shemesh R; Nageris B
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(3):330-8. PubMed ID: 24509531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Diagnostics on noise-induced hearing loss].
    Gimsing S
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2014 Jul; 176(31):1445-8. PubMed ID: 25292321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effects of lifetime noise exposure on the middle-age human auditory brainstem response, tinnitus and speech-in-noise intelligibility.
    Valderrama JT; Beach EF; Yeend I; Sharma M; Van Dun B; Dillon H
    Hear Res; 2018 Aug; 365():36-48. PubMed ID: 29913342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The Effects of Sensorineural Hearing Impairment on Asynchronous Glimpsing of Speech.
    Ozmeral EJ; Buss E; Hall JW
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0154920. PubMed ID: 27144601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.