These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 287364)

  • 41. Clinical measurements of speech reception threshold in noise.
    Hagerman B
    Scand Audiol; 1984; 13(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 6719016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The digits-in-noise test: assessing auditory speech recognition abilities in noise.
    Smits C; Theo Goverts S; Festen JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Mar; 133(3):1693-706. PubMed ID: 23464039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Evaluation of the speech perception in noise (SPIN) test.
    Hutcherson RW; Dirks DD; Morgan DE
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg (1979); 1979; 87(2):239-45. PubMed ID: 503495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Comparison of the revised Hearing Performance Inventory with audiometric measures.
    Hawes NA; Niswander PS
    Ear Hear; 1985; 6(2):93-7. PubMed ID: 3996791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. [Utility and limitations of speech audiometry testing in the detection of occupational noise-induced hearing loss: a comparative study in two groups in the hospital setting].
    Babin E; Bequignon A; Goullet de Rugy M; Edy E; Moreau S; Izard JP; Valdazo A
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2002; 123(4):213-7. PubMed ID: 12723484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. [Distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAE) in chronic noise-induced hearing loss--recommendations for expert assessment].
    Oeken I; Müller H
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1995 Aug; 74(8):473-80. PubMed ID: 7575898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Speech reception with different bilateral directional processing schemes: Influence of binaural hearing, audiometric asymmetry, and acoustic scenario.
    Neher T; Wagener KC; Latzel M
    Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():36-48. PubMed ID: 28783570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. [Influence of disturbing noise on sentence intelligibility (author's transl)].
    Welzl-Müller K
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1981 Mar; 60(3):117-20. PubMed ID: 7230993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Speech reception thresholds in noise and self-reported hearing disability in a general adult population.
    Smits C; Kramer SE; Houtgast T
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):538-49. PubMed ID: 16957503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The intelligibility of sentences in quiet and in noise in aged listeners.
    Duquesnoy AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Oct; 74(4):1136-44. PubMed ID: 6643835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Noise-induced hearing loss in young adults: the role of personal listening devices and other sources of leisure noise.
    Mostafapour SP; Lahargoue K; Gates GA
    Laryngoscope; 1998 Dec; 108(12):1832-9. PubMed ID: 9851500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Psychophysical suppression effects for tonal and speech signals.
    Dubno JR; Ahlstrom JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Oct; 110(4):2108-19. PubMed ID: 11681388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Speech pure tone audiometry as a screen for exaggerated hearing loss in industrial claims.
    Alberti PW; Morgan PP; Czuba I
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1978; 85(5-6):328-31. PubMed ID: 665204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Auditory dysfunction in occupational noise exposed workers.
    Sallustio V; Portalatini P; Soleo L; Cassano F; Pesola G; Lasorsa G; Quaranta N; Salonna I
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1998; 48():95-110. PubMed ID: 9505302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Use of low-pass noise in word-recognition testing.
    Cohen RL; Keith RW
    J Speech Hear Res; 1976 Mar; 19(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 1271800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. [Application of extended high frequency audiometry in the early diagnosis of noise--induced hearing loss].
    Wang Y; Yang B; Li Y; Hou L; Hu Y; Han Y
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2000 Feb; 35(1):26-8. PubMed ID: 12768684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. A model for the speech-reception threshold in noise without and with a hearing aid.
    Plomp R; Duquesnoy AJ
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1982; 15():95-111. PubMed ID: 6955931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Development and evaluation of the Turkish matrix sentence test.
    Zokoll MA; Fidan D; Türkyılmaz D; Hochmuth S; Ergenç İ; Sennaroğlu G; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():51-61. PubMed ID: 26443486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Acclimatization effect in speech recognition: evaluation without hearing aids.
    Santos SN; Petry T; Costa MJ
    Pro Fono; 2010; 22(4):543-8. PubMed ID: 21271114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Polish sentence matrix test for speech intelligibility measurement in noise.
    Ozimek E; Warzybok A; Kutzner D
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Jun; 49(6):444-54. PubMed ID: 20482292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.