These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28736736)

  • 1. Feedback-Driven Sensory Mapping Adaptation for Robust Speech Activity Detection.
    Bellur A; Elhilali M
    IEEE/ACM Trans Audio Speech Lang Process; 2017 Mar; 25(3):481-492. PubMed ID: 28736736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Framework for Speech Activity Detection Using Adaptive Auditory Receptive Fields.
    Carlin MA; Elhilali M
    IEEE/ACM Trans Audio Speech Lang Process; 2015 Dec; 23(12):2422-2433. PubMed ID: 29904642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Noise-robust cortical tracking of attended speech in real-world acoustic scenes.
    Fuglsang SA; Dau T; Hjortkjær J
    Neuroimage; 2017 Aug; 156():435-444. PubMed ID: 28412441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Discrimination of speech and of complex nonspeech sounds of different temporal structure in the left and right cerebral hemispheres.
    Shtyrov Y; Kujala T; Palva S; Ilmoniemi RJ; Näätänen R
    Neuroimage; 2000 Dec; 12(6):657-63. PubMed ID: 11112397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Neurophysiological indices of speech and nonspeech stimulus processing.
    Tampas JW; Harkrider AW; Hedrick MS
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Oct; 48(5):1147-64. PubMed ID: 16411803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Eye Can Hear Clearly Now: Inverse Effectiveness in Natural Audiovisual Speech Processing Relies on Long-Term Crossmodal Temporal Integration.
    Crosse MJ; Di Liberto GM; Lalor EC
    J Neurosci; 2016 Sep; 36(38):9888-95. PubMed ID: 27656026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Time course of early audiovisual interactions during speech and nonspeech central auditory processing: a magnetoencephalography study.
    Hertrich I; Mathiak K; Lutzenberger W; Ackermann H
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Feb; 21(2):259-74. PubMed ID: 18510440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The perception of speech sounds by the human brain as reflected by the mismatch negativity (MMN) and its magnetic equivalent (MMNm).
    Näätänen R
    Psychophysiology; 2001 Jan; 38(1):1-21. PubMed ID: 11321610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Separable spectro-temporal Gabor filter bank features: Reducing the complexity of robust features for automatic speech recognition.
    Schädler MR; Kollmeier B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Apr; 137(4):2047-59. PubMed ID: 25920855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does attention play a role in dynamic receptive field adaptation to changing acoustic salience in A1?
    Fritz JB; Elhilali M; David SV; Shamma SA
    Hear Res; 2007 Jul; 229(1-2):186-203. PubMed ID: 17329048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Differentiation of speech and nonspeech processing within primary auditory cortex.
    Whalen DH; Benson RR; Richardson M; Swainson B; Clark VP; Lai S; Mencl WE; Fulbright RK; Constable RT; Liberman AM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Jan; 119(1):575-81. PubMed ID: 16454311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Isolating Neural Indices of Continuous Speech Processing at the Phonetic Level.
    Di Liberto GM; Lalor EC
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2016; 894():337-345. PubMed ID: 27080674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Phonetic processing areas revealed by sinewave speech and acoustically similar non-speech.
    Benson RR; Richardson M; Whalen DH; Lai S
    Neuroimage; 2006 May; 31(1):342-53. PubMed ID: 16530428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An auditory-feedback-based neural network model of speech production that is robust to developmental changes in the size and shape of the articulatory system.
    Callan DE; Kent RD; Guenther FH; Vorperian HK
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2000 Jun; 43(3):721-36. PubMed ID: 10877441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Detection of sounds in the auditory stream: event-related fMRI evidence for differential activation to speech and nonspeech.
    Vouloumanos A; Kiehl KA; Werker JF; Liddle PF
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2001 Oct; 13(7):994-1005. PubMed ID: 11595101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Compression-dependent differences in hearing aid gain between speech and nonspeech input signals.
    Henning RW; Bentler R
    Ear Hear; 2005 Aug; 26(4):409-22. PubMed ID: 16079635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Auditory evoked potentials to speech and nonspeech stimuli are associated with verbal skills in preschoolers.
    Kuuluvainen S; Leminen A; Kujala T
    Dev Cogn Neurosci; 2016 Jun; 19():223-32. PubMed ID: 27131343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Responsiveness of the human auditory cortex to degraded speech sounds: reduction of amplitude resolution vs. additive noise.
    Miettinen I; Alku P; Salminen N; May PJ; Tiitinen H
    Brain Res; 2011 Jan; 1367():298-309. PubMed ID: 20969833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Adaptation of speech by nonspeech: evidence for complex acoustic cue detectors.
    Samuel AG; Newport EL
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1979 Aug; 5(3):563-78. PubMed ID: 528959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.