BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

613 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28738288)

  • 1. It doesn't matter what you say: FMRI correlates of voice learning and recognition independent of speech content.
    Zäske R; Awwad Shiekh Hasan B; Belin P
    Cortex; 2017 Sep; 94():100-112. PubMed ID: 28738288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Electrophysiological correlates of voice learning and recognition.
    Zäske R; Volberg G; Kovács G; Schweinberger SR
    J Neurosci; 2014 Aug; 34(33):10821-31. PubMed ID: 25122885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An fMRI study investigating effects of conceptually related sentences on the perception of degraded speech.
    Guediche S; Reilly M; Santiago C; Laurent P; Blumstein SE
    Cortex; 2016 Jun; 79():57-74. PubMed ID: 27100909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Talker-specific learning in speech perception.
    Nygaard LC; Pisoni DB
    Percept Psychophys; 1998 Apr; 60(3):355-76. PubMed ID: 9599989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Distinct functional substrates along the right superior temporal sulcus for the processing of voices.
    Kriegstein KV; Giraud AL
    Neuroimage; 2004 Jun; 22(2):948-55. PubMed ID: 15193626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Neural correlates underlying the comprehension of deceitful and ironic communicative intentions.
    Bosco FM; Parola A; Valentini MC; Morese R
    Cortex; 2017 Sep; 94():73-86. PubMed ID: 28728080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fluency-dependent cortical activation associated with speech production and comprehension in second language learners.
    Shimada K; Hirotani M; Yokokawa H; Yoshida H; Makita K; Yamazaki-Murase M; Tanabe HC; Sadato N
    Neuroscience; 2015 Aug; 300():474-92. PubMed ID: 26026679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The processing of intimately familiar and unfamiliar voices: Specific neural responses of speaker recognition and identification.
    Plante-Hébert J; Boucher VJ; Jemel B
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(4):e0250214. PubMed ID: 33861789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mean-based neural coding of voices.
    Andics A; McQueen JM; Petersson KM
    Neuroimage; 2013 Oct; 79():351-60. PubMed ID: 23664949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Toddlers' comprehension of adult and child talkers: Adult targets versus vocal tract similarity.
    Cooper A; Fecher N; Johnson EK
    Cognition; 2018 Apr; 173():16-20. PubMed ID: 29287204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Electrophysiological correlates of voice memory for young and old speakers in young and old listeners.
    Zäske R; Limbach K; Schneider D; Skuk VG; Dobel C; Guntinas-Lichius O; Schweinberger SR
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 Jul; 116(Pt B):215-227. PubMed ID: 28802769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hemispheric lateralization of linguistic prosody recognition in comparison to speech and speaker recognition.
    Kreitewolf J; Friederici AD; von Kriegstein K
    Neuroimage; 2014 Nov; 102 Pt 2():332-44. PubMed ID: 25087482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Neural architecture underlying person perception from in-group and out-group voices.
    Jiang X; Sanford R; Pell MD
    Neuroimage; 2018 Nov; 181():582-597. PubMed ID: 30031933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predictive processing increases intelligibility of acoustically distorted speech: Behavioral and neural correlates.
    Hakonen M; May PJC; Jääskeläinen IP; Jokinen E; Sams M; Tiitinen H
    Brain Behav; 2017 Sep; 7(9):e00789. PubMed ID: 28948083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Voices to remember: Comparing neural signatures of intentional and non-intentional voice learning and recognition.
    Humble D; Schweinberger SR; Dobel C; Zäske R
    Brain Res; 2019 May; 1711():214-225. PubMed ID: 30685271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Brain activity varies with modulation of dynamic pitch variance in sentence melody.
    Meyer M; Steinhauer K; Alter K; Friederici AD; von Cramon DY
    Brain Lang; 2004 May; 89(2):277-89. PubMed ID: 15068910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The role of the IFG and pSTS in syntactic prediction: Evidence from a parametric study of hierarchical structure in fMRI.
    Matchin W; Hammerly C; Lau E
    Cortex; 2017 Mar; 88():106-123. PubMed ID: 28088041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of emotional prosody, content, and repetition on memory recognition of speaker identity.
    Xu H; Armony JL
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2021 Jul; 74(7):1185-1201. PubMed ID: 33586530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Gradient language dominance affects talker learning.
    Bregman MR; Creel SC
    Cognition; 2014 Jan; 130(1):85-95. PubMed ID: 24211437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Neural Mechanism Underling Comprehension of Narrative Speech and Its Heritability: Study in a Large Population.
    Babajani-Feremi A
    Brain Topogr; 2017 Sep; 30(5):592-609. PubMed ID: 28214981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 31.