These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

351 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28739094)

  • 1. Automatic repositioning of jaw segments for three-dimensional virtual treatment planning of orthognathic surgery.
    Santos RMGD; De Martino JM; Passeri LA; Attux RRF; Haiter Neto F
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2017 Sep; 45(9):1399-1407. PubMed ID: 28739094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Does two-dimensional vs. three-dimensional surgical simulation produce better surgical outcomes among patients with class III facial asymmetry?
    Udomlarptham N; Lin CH; Wang YC; Ko EW
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Aug; 47(8):1022-1031. PubMed ID: 29606563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Three-dimensional Analysis and Evaluation in Orthognathic Surgical Cases with Facial Asymmetry.
    Kogou T; Takaki T; Shibahara T
    Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 2018; 59(3):147-161. PubMed ID: 30224609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Computer-assisted orthognathic surgery: waferless maxillary positioning, versatility, and accuracy of an image-guided visualisation display.
    Zinser MJ; Mischkowski RA; Dreiseidler T; Thamm OC; Rothamel D; Zöller JE
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Dec; 51(8):827-33. PubMed ID: 24045105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computer-assisted orthognathic surgery: feasibility study using multiple CAD/CAM surgical splints.
    Zinser MJ; Mischkowski RA; Sailer HF; Zöller JE
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2012 May; 113(5):673-87. PubMed ID: 22668627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Computer-assisted orthognathic surgery for correction of facial asymmetry: results of a randomised controlled clinical trial.
    De Riu G; Meloni SM; Baj A; Corda A; Soma D; Tullio A
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Mar; 52(3):251-7. PubMed ID: 24418178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A paradigm shift in orthognathic surgery? A comparison of navigation, computer-aided designed/computer-aided manufactured splints, and "classic" intermaxillary splints to surgical transfer of virtual orthognathic planning.
    Zinser MJ; Sailer HF; Ritter L; Braumann B; Maegele M; Zöller JE
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Dec; 71(12):2151.e1-21. PubMed ID: 24237776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography-based virtual treatment planning and fabrication of a surgical splint for asymmetric patients: surgery first approach.
    Uribe F; Janakiraman N; Shafer D; Nanda R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Nov; 144(5):748-58. PubMed ID: 24182591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Orthognathic positioning system: intraoperative system to transfer virtual surgical plan to operating field during orthognathic surgery.
    Polley JW; Figueroa AA
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 May; 71(5):911-20. PubMed ID: 23312847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Accuracy and Stability of Intentional Change of Frontal-Ramal Inclination in Orthognathic Surgery for Facial Asymmetry Patients.
    Ha SH; Meny AH; Jeong CG; Yeo JH; Baek SH; Choi JY
    J Craniofac Surg; 2023 Jul-Aug 01; 34(5):e462-e468. PubMed ID: 37010321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Enhanced Surgical Outcomes in Patients With Skeletal Class III Facial Asymmetry by 3-Dimensional Surgical Simulation.
    Ko EW; Lin CH; Chen YA; Chen YR
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 May; 76(5):1073-1083. PubMed ID: 29031529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Treatment outcome in orthognathic surgery-A prospective randomized blinded case-controlled comparison of planning accuracy in computer-assisted two- and three-dimensional planning techniques (part II).
    Bengtsson M; Wall G; Greiff L; Rasmusson L
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2017 Sep; 45(9):1419-1424. PubMed ID: 28800842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Improved Virtual Planning for Bimaxillary Orthognathic Surgery.
    Hatamleh M; Turner C; Bhamrah G; Mack G; Osher J
    J Craniofac Surg; 2016 Sep; 27(6):e568-73. PubMed ID: 27428909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of virtual surgical planning in two-jaw orthognathic surgery: comparison of planned and actual results.
    Zhang N; Liu S; Hu Z; Hu J; Zhu S; Li Y
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2016 Aug; 122(2):143-51. PubMed ID: 27209483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical feasibility and efficacy of using virtual surgical planning in bimaxillary orthognathic surgery without intermediate splint.
    Li Y; Jiang Y; Zhang N; Xu R; Hu J; Zhu S
    J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Mar; 26(2):501-5. PubMed ID: 25699539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. New 3-dimensional cephalometric analysis for orthognathic surgery.
    Gateno J; Xia JJ; Teichgraeber JF
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 69(3):606-22. PubMed ID: 21257250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. New protocol for three-dimensional surgical planning and CAD/CAM splint generation in orthognathic surgery: an in vitro and in vivo study.
    Hernández-Alfaro F; Guijarro-Martínez R
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Dec; 42(12):1547-56. PubMed ID: 23768749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Frontal soft tissue analysis using a 3 dimensional camera following two-jaw rotational orthognathic surgery in skeletal class III patients.
    Choi JW; Lee JY; Oh TS; Kwon SM; Yang SJ; Koh KS
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Apr; 42(3):220-6. PubMed ID: 23870714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Timing of three-dimensional virtual treatment planning of orthognathic surgery: a prospective single-surgeon evaluation on 350 consecutive cases.
    Swennen GR
    Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am; 2014 Nov; 26(4):475-85. PubMed ID: 25220754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison between one-jaw and two-jaw designs in virtual surgery planning for patients with class III malocclusion.
    Hattori Y; Pai BC; Lo CC; Chou PY; Lo LJ
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2024 May; 52(5):612-618. PubMed ID: 38448337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.