These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28739105)

  • 21. Abundance and characteristics of microfibers detected in sediment trap material from the deep subtropical North Atlantic Ocean.
    Reineccius J; Appelt JS; Hinrichs T; Kaiser D; Stern J; Prien RD; Waniek JJ
    Sci Total Environ; 2020 Oct; 738():140354. PubMed ID: 32806357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Distribution and composition of plastic debris along the river shore in the Selenga River basin in Mongolia.
    Battulga B; Kawahigashi M; Oyuntsetseg B
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 May; 26(14):14059-14072. PubMed ID: 30852749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The Chubut River estuary as a source of microplastics and other anthropogenic particles into the Southwestern Atlantic Ocean.
    Giarratano E; Di Mauro R; Silva LI; Tomba JP; Hernández-Moresino RD
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2022 Dec; 185(Pt A):114267. PubMed ID: 36327930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Microplastic abundance, distribution and composition in the Pearl River along Guangzhou city and Pearl River estuary, China.
    Yan M; Nie H; Xu K; He Y; Hu Y; Huang Y; Wang J
    Chemosphere; 2019 Feb; 217():879-886. PubMed ID: 30458423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Microplastic pollution is widely detected in US municipal wastewater treatment plant effluent.
    Mason SA; Garneau D; Sutton R; Chu Y; Ehmann K; Barnes J; Fink P; Papazissimos D; Rogers DL
    Environ Pollut; 2016 Nov; 218():1045-1054. PubMed ID: 27574803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Wastewater treatment plant effluent and microfiber pollution: focus on industry-specific wastewater.
    Ramasamy R; Aragaw TA; Balasaraswathi Subramanian R
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Jul; 29(34):51211-51233. PubMed ID: 35606585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Plastic in the Thames: a river runs through it.
    Morritt D; Stefanoudis PV; Pearce D; Crimmen OA; Clark PF
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2014 Jan; 78(1-2):196-200. PubMed ID: 24239306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Microfiber release from different fabrics during washing.
    Yang L; Qiao F; Lei K; Li H; Kang Y; Cui S; An L
    Environ Pollut; 2019 Jun; 249():136-143. PubMed ID: 30884392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Synthetic Microfiber Material Influences Ingestion by Freshwater Worms.
    Martinez SA; Simon CJ; Cohen RA
    Bull Environ Contam Toxicol; 2023 Apr; 110(5):87. PubMed ID: 37119338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. First assessment of microplastic and artificial microfiber contamination in surface waters of the Amazon Continental Shelf.
    Queiroz AFDS; da Conceição AS; Chelazzi D; Rollnic M; Cincinelli A; Giarrizzo T; Martinelli Filho JE
    Sci Total Environ; 2022 Sep; 839():156259. PubMed ID: 35644394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Review of research on migration, distribution, biological effects, and analytical methods of microfibers in the environment.
    Li Y; Lu Q; Xing Y; Liu K; Ling W; Yang J; Yang Q; Wu T; Zhang J; Pei Z; Gao Z; Li X; Yang F; Ma H; Liu K; Zhao D
    Sci Total Environ; 2023 Jan; 855():158922. PubMed ID: 36155038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Capturing microfibers - marketed technologies reduce microfiber emissions from washing machines.
    McIlwraith HK; Lin J; Erdle LM; Mallos N; Diamond ML; Rochman CM
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2019 Feb; 139():40-45. PubMed ID: 30686443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Review on alternatives for the reduction of textile microfibers emission to water.
    Belzagui F; Gutiérrez-Bouzán C
    J Environ Manage; 2022 Sep; 317():115347. PubMed ID: 35642816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Identification of Microfibers in the Environment Using Multiple Lines of Evidence.
    Zhu X; Nguyen B; You JB; Karakolis E; Sinton D; Rochman C
    Environ Sci Technol; 2019 Oct; 53(20):11877-11887. PubMed ID: 31525870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Sources and dispersive modes of micro-fibers in the environment.
    Carr SA
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 May; 13(3):466-469. PubMed ID: 28440926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of microplastics and microfiber contamination in effluents of the City of Saskatoon wastewater treatment plant.
    Prajapati S; Beal M; Maley J; Brinkmann M
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 33625707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Microplastic pollution identified in deep-sea water and ingested by benthic invertebrates in the Rockall Trough, North Atlantic Ocean.
    Courtene-Jones W; Quinn B; Gary SF; Mogg AOM; Narayanaswamy BE
    Environ Pollut; 2017 Dec; 231(Pt 1):271-280. PubMed ID: 28806692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Hong Kong at the Pearl River Estuary: A hotspot of microplastic pollution.
    Fok L; Cheung PK
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2015 Oct; 99(1-2):112-8. PubMed ID: 26233305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Microplastic ingestion by riverine macroinvertebrates.
    Windsor FM; Tilley RM; Tyler CR; Ormerod SJ
    Sci Total Environ; 2019 Jan; 646():68-74. PubMed ID: 30048870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Protected areas in the Atlantic facing the hazards of micro-plastic pollution: first diagnosis of three islands in the Canary Current.
    Baztan J; Carrasco A; Chouinard O; Cleaud M; Gabaldon JE; Huck T; Jaffrès L; Jorgensen B; Miguelez A; Paillard C; Vanderlinden JP
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2014 Mar; 80(1-2):302-11. PubMed ID: 24433999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.