471 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28739333)
1. Comparison of Two Multiparameter Acoustic Indices of Dysphonia Severity: The Acoustic Voice Quality Index and Cepstral Spectral Index of Dysphonia.
Lee JM; Roy N; Peterson E; Merrill RM
J Voice; 2018 Jul; 32(4):515.e1-515.e13. PubMed ID: 28739333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Toward validation of the cepstral spectral index of dysphonia (CSID) as an objective treatment outcomes measure.
Peterson EA; Roy N; Awan SN; Merrill RM; Banks R; Tanner K
J Voice; 2013 Jul; 27(4):401-10. PubMed ID: 23809565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Automated acoustic analysis of task dependency in adductor spasmodic dysphonia versus muscle tension dysphonia.
Roy N; Mazin A; Awan SN
Laryngoscope; 2014 Mar; 124(3):718-24. PubMed ID: 23946147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of Two Versions of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index for Quantification of Dysphonia Severity.
Kim GH; Lee YW; Bae IH; Park HJ; Lee BJ; Kwon SB
J Voice; 2020 May; 34(3):489.e11-489.e19. PubMed ID: 30527706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Spectral-cepstral estimation of dysphonia severity: external validation.
Awan SN; Solomon NP; Helou LB; Stojadinovic A
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2013 Jan; 122(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 23472315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Lithuanian Language.
Uloza V; Petrauskas T; Padervinskis E; Ulozaitė N; Barsties B; Maryn Y
J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):257.e1-257.e11. PubMed ID: 27427182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Acoustic analysis of four common voice diagnoses: moving toward disorder-specific assessment.
Gillespie AI; Dastolfo C; Magid N; Gartner-Schmidt J
J Voice; 2014 Sep; 28(5):582-8. PubMed ID: 24880672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validation of Cepstral Acoustic Analysis for Normal and Pathological Voice in the Japanese Language.
Mizuta M; Abe C; Taguchi E; Takeue T; Tamaki H; Haji T
J Voice; 2022 Nov; 36(6):770-776. PubMed ID: 32951954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An Examination of Pre- and Posttreatment Acoustic Versus Auditory Perceptual Analyses of Voice Across Four Common Voice Disorders.
Gillespie AI; Gartner-Schmidt J; Lewandowski A; Awan SN
J Voice; 2018 Mar; 32(2):169-176. PubMed ID: 28688672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validation of the Cepstral Spectral Index of Dysphonia (CSID) as a Screening Tool for Voice Disorders: Development of Clinical Cutoff Scores.
Awan SN; Roy N; Zhang D; Cohen SM
J Voice; 2016 Mar; 30(2):130-44. PubMed ID: 26361215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Auditory-Perceptual and Acoustic Methods in Measuring Dysphonia Severity of Korean Speech.
Maryn Y; Kim HT; Kim J
J Voice; 2016 Sep; 30(5):587-94. PubMed ID: 26316139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The cepstral spectral index of dysphonia, the acoustic voice quality index and the acoustic breathiness index as novel multiparametric indices for acoustic assessment of voice quality.
Barsties V Latoszek B; Mathmann P; Neumann K
Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2021 Dec; 29(6):451-457. PubMed ID: 34334615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index, Version 03.01, in French.
Pommée T; Maryn Y; Finck C; Morsomme D
J Voice; 2020 Jul; 34(4):646.e11-646.e26. PubMed ID: 30598420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Predictive value and discriminant capacity of cepstral- and spectral-based measures during continuous speech.
Lowell SY; Colton RH; Kelley RT; Mizia SA
J Voice; 2013 Jul; 27(4):393-400. PubMed ID: 23684735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of Dysphonia Severity Index and Acoustic Voice Quality Index measures in differentiating normal and dysphonic voices.
Uloza V; Latoszek BBV; Ulozaite-Staniene N; Petrauskas T; Maryn Y
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 Apr; 275(4):949-958. PubMed ID: 29442165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Voice in Friedreich Ataxia.
Vogel AP; Wardrop MI; Folker JE; Synofzik M; Corben LA; Delatycki MB; Awan SN
J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):243.e9-243.e19. PubMed ID: 27501923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Acoustic Voice Quality Index, Version 03.01, in French and the Voice Handicap Index.
Pommée T; Maryn Y; Finck C; Morsomme D
J Voice; 2020 Jul; 34(4):646.e1-646.e10. PubMed ID: 30583889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validation of Acoustic Voice Quality Index Version 3.01 and Acoustic Breathiness Index in Korean Population.
Kim GH; von Latoszek BB; Lee YW
J Voice; 2021 Jul; 35(4):660.e9-660.e18. PubMed ID: 31708369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The acoustic voice quality index version 02.02 in the Finnish-speaking population.
Kankare E; Barsties V Latoszek B; Maryn Y; Asikainen M; Rorarius E; Vilpas S; Ilomäki I; Tyrmi J; Rantala L; Laukkanen AM
Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2020 Jul; 45(2):49-56. PubMed ID: 30720373
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Diagnostic Accuracy of Acoustic Voice Quality Index Version 02.03 in Discriminating across the Perceptual Degrees of Dysphonia Severity in Kannada Language.
Kishore Pebbili G; Shabnam S; Pushpavathi M; Rashmi J; Gopi Sankar R; Nethra R; Shreya S; Shashish G
J Voice; 2021 Jan; 35(1):159.e11-159.e18. PubMed ID: 31543357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
