604 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28741030)
1. Hidden and overall haemorrhage following minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
Yang Y; Zhang L; Liu B; Pang M; Xie P; Chen Z; Wu W; Feng F; Rong L
J Orthop Traumatol; 2017 Dec; 18(4):395-400. PubMed ID: 28741030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of hidden blood loss and clinical efficacy of percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
Ge M; Zhang Y; Ying H; Feng C; Li Y; Tian J; Zhao T; Shao H; Huang Y
Int Orthop; 2022 Sep; 46(9):2063-2070. PubMed ID: 35723702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the Total and Hidden Blood Loss in Patients Undergoing Open and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
Zhang H; Chen ZX; Sun ZM; Jiang C; Ni WF; Lin Y; Wu YS
World Neurosurg; 2017 Nov; 107():739-743. PubMed ID: 28844914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Treatment of grade I and II degree degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with minimally invasive surgery-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion under Quadrant channel].
Wen J; Yang Y; Zhang H; Liu L; Liu YL; Liu Y; Wang D; Wang ZP
Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2019 Mar; 32(3):199-206. PubMed ID: 30921999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Comparison of short-term effectiveness between minimally invasive surgery- and open-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for single-level lumbar degenerative disease].
Yang J; Kong Q; Song Y; Liu H; Zeng J
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Mar; 27(3):262-7. PubMed ID: 23672121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of radiographic and clinical outcomes of an articulating expandable interbody cage in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis.
Massie LW; Zakaria HM; Schultz LR; Basheer A; Buraimoh MA; Chang V
Neurosurg Focus; 2018 Jan; 44(1):E8. PubMed ID: 29290133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of surgical invasiveness, hidden blood loss, and clinical outcome between unilateral biportal endoscopic and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative disease: a retrospective cohort study.
Huang X; Wang W; Chen G; Guan X; Zhou Y; Tang Y
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2023 Apr; 24(1):274. PubMed ID: 37038129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with expandable versus static interbody devices: radiographic assessment of sagittal segmental and pelvic parameters.
Hawasli AH; Khalifeh JM; Chatrath A; Yarbrough CK; Ray WZ
Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Aug; 43(2):E10. PubMed ID: 28760032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of Preliminary clinical outcomes between percutaneous endoscopic and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative diseases in a tertiary hospital: Is percutaneous endoscopic procedure superior to MIS-TLIF? A prospective cohort study.
Ao S; Zheng W; Wu J; Tang Y; Zhang C; Zhou Y; Li C
Int J Surg; 2020 Apr; 76():136-143. PubMed ID: 32165279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A prospective, multi-institutional comparative effectiveness study of lumbar spine surgery in morbidly obese patients: does minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion result in superior outcomes?
Adogwa O; Carr K; Thompson P; Hoang K; Darlington T; Perez E; Fatemi P; Gottfried O; Cheng J; Isaacs RE
World Neurosurg; 2015 May; 83(5):860-6. PubMed ID: 25535070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Microendoscopy-Assisted Minimally Invasive Versus Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: 5-Year Outcomes.
Yang Y; Liu ZY; Zhang LM; Pang M; Chhantyal K; Wu WB; Chen ZH; Luo CX; Rong LM; Liu B
World Neurosurg; 2018 Aug; 116():e602-e610. PubMed ID: 29778600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Time Course Observation of Outcomes between Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
Lin GX; Park CK; Hur JW; Kim JS
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo); 2019 Jun; 59(6):222-230. PubMed ID: 31068542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Perioperative outcomes and adverse events of minimally invasive versus open posterior lumbar fusion: meta-analysis and systematic review.
Goldstein CL; Macwan K; Sundararajan K; Rampersaud YR
J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Mar; 24(3):416-27. PubMed ID: 26565767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Distinct fusion intersegmental parameters regarding local sagittal balance provide similar clinical outcomes: a comparative study of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
Li F; Li C; Xi X; Zeng Z; Ma B; Xie N; Wang H; Yu Y; Cheng L
BMC Surg; 2020 May; 20(1):97. PubMed ID: 32398125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical outcomes after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and lateral lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of degenerative lumbar disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Keorochana G; Setrkraising K; Woratanarat P; Arirachakaran A; Kongtharvonskul J
Neurosurg Rev; 2018 Jul; 41(3):755-770. PubMed ID: 28013419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Learning curve of a complex surgical technique: minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF).
Lee KH; Yeo W; Soeharno H; Yue WM
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2014 Oct; 27(7):E234-40. PubMed ID: 24513660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: comparison of clinical outcomes among obese patients.
Terman SW; Yee TJ; Lau D; Khan AA; La Marca F; Park P
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Jun; 20(6):644-52. PubMed ID: 24745355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Multilevel: Comparison with Conventional Transforaminal Interbody Fusion.
Lee WC; Park JY; Kim KH; Kuh SU; Chin DK; Kim KS; Cho YE
World Neurosurg; 2016 Jan; 85():236-43. PubMed ID: 26386459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Psychological and Functional Comparison between Minimally Invasive and Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Single-Level Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.
Yu B; Zhang J; Pan J; Wang Y; Chen Y; Zhao W; Wu D
Orthop Surg; 2021 Jun; 13(4):1213-1226. PubMed ID: 33943023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis: comparative effectiveness and cost-utility analysis.
Parker SL; Mendenhall SK; Shau DN; Zuckerman SL; Godil SS; Cheng JS; McGirt MJ
World Neurosurg; 2014; 82(1-2):230-8. PubMed ID: 23321379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
