BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

825 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28741172)

  • 1. Glass ionomer cement inhibits secondary caries in an in vitro biofilm model.
    Krämer N; Schmidt M; Lücker S; Domann E; Frankenberger R
    Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Mar; 22(2):1019-1031. PubMed ID: 28741172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Secondary caries formation with a two-species biofilm artificial mouth.
    Amend S; Frankenberger R; Lücker S; Domann E; Krämer N
    Dent Mater; 2018 May; 34(5):786-796. PubMed ID: 29544984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fluoride release and caries inhibition associated with a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement at varying fluoride loading doses.
    Donly KJ; Segura A
    Am J Dent; 2002 Feb; 15(1):8-10. PubMed ID: 12074234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Demineralization around orthodontic brackets bonded with resin-modified glass ionomer cement and fluoride-releasing resin composite.
    Wilson RM; Donly KJ
    Pediatr Dent; 2001; 23(3):255-9. PubMed ID: 11447960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of open-sandwich vs. adhesive restorative techniques on enamel and dentine demineralization: an in situ study.
    Kirsten GA; Rached RN; Mazur RF; Vieira S; Souza EM
    J Dent; 2013 Oct; 41(10):872-80. PubMed ID: 23851134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An in vitro investigation of marginal dentine caries abutting composite resin and glass ionomer cement restorations.
    Knight GM; McIntyre JM; Craig GG; Mulyani ; Zilm PS; Gully NJ
    Aust Dent J; 2007 Sep; 52(3):187-92. PubMed ID: 17969286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In situ effects of restorative materials on dental biofilm and enamel demineralisation.
    Sousa RP; Zanin IC; Lima JP; Vasconcelos SM; Melo MA; Beltrão HC; Rodrigues LK
    J Dent; 2009 Jan; 37(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 19026481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of resin-modified glass ionomer cements on secondary caries.
    Nagamine M; Itota T; Torii Y; Irie M; Staninec M; Inoue K
    Am J Dent; 1997 Aug; 10(4):173-8. PubMed ID: 9590903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An in vitro study on the secondary caries-prevention properties of three restorative materials.
    Lai GY; Zhu LK; Li MY; Wang J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Nov; 110(5):363-8. PubMed ID: 23998624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical performance and caries inhibition of resin-modified glass ionomer cement and amalgam restorations.
    Donly KJ; Segura A; Kanellis M; Erickson RL
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1999 Oct; 130(10):1459-66. PubMed ID: 10570589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of flowable composite liner and glass ionomer liner on class II gingival marginal adaptation of direct composite restorations with different bonding strategies.
    Aggarwal V; Singla M; Yadav S; Yadav H
    J Dent; 2014 May; 42(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 24631232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In vitro caries inhibition effects by conventional and resin-modified glass-ionomer restorations.
    Tam LE; Chan GP; Yim D
    Oper Dent; 1997; 22(1):4-14. PubMed ID: 9227122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An in vitro caries inhibition of photopolymerized glass ionomer liners.
    Donly KJ; Ingram C
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1997; 64(2):128-30. PubMed ID: 9189003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Inhibition of artificial secondary caries in root by fluoride-releasing restorative materials.
    Torii Y; Itota T; Okamoto M; Nakabo S; Nagamine M; Inoue K
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 11203775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prevention of enamel demineralization adjacent to glass ionomer filling materials.
    Forss H; Seppä L
    Scand J Dent Res; 1990 Apr; 98(2):173-8. PubMed ID: 2111576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.
    Kasraei S; Azarsina M; Majidi S
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vivo vs in vitro anticariogenic behavior of glass-ionomer and resin composite restorative materials.
    Papagiannoulis L; Kakaboura A; Eliades G
    Dent Mater; 2002 Dec; 18(8):561-9. PubMed ID: 12385896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Resin-modified glass-ionomer restorations and in vitro secondary caries formation in coronal enamel.
    Hicks MJ; Flaitz CM
    Quintessence Int; 2000 Sep; 31(8):570-8. PubMed ID: 11203979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of postoperative bleaching on marginal leakage of resin composite and resin-modified glass ionomer restorations at different delayed periods of exposure to carbamide peroxide.
    Moosavi H; Ghavamnasiri M; Manari V
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 Nov; 10(6):E009-16. PubMed ID: 20020076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of conventional and resin-modified glass-ionomer liner on dentin adhesive interface of Class I cavity walls after thermocycling.
    Sampaio PC; de Almeida Júnior AA; Francisconi LF; Casas-Apayco LC; Pereira JC; Wang L; Atta MT
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(4):403-12. PubMed ID: 21913841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 42.