279 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28742062)
1. A method to incorporate the effect of beam quality on image noise in a digitally reconstructed radiograph (DRR) based computer simulation for optimisation of digital radiography.
Moore CS; Wood TJ; Saunderson JR; Beavis AW
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Sep; 62(18):7379-7393. PubMed ID: 28742062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A method to produce and validate a digitally reconstructed radiograph-based computer simulation for optimisation of chest radiographs acquired with a computed radiography imaging system.
Moore CS; Liney GP; Beavis AW; Saunderson JR
Br J Radiol; 2011 Oct; 84(1006):890-902. PubMed ID: 21933979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Image simulation and a model of noise power spectra across a range of mammographic beam qualities.
Mackenzie A; Dance DR; Diaz O; Young KC
Med Phys; 2014 Dec; 41(12):121901. PubMed ID: 25471961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A technique for optimization of digitally reconstructed radiographs of the chest in virtual simulation.
Killoran JH; Baldini EH; Beard CJ; Chin L
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2001 Jan; 49(1):231-9. PubMed ID: 11163520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Experimental investigation of the dose and image quality characteristics of a digital mammography imaging system.
Huda W; Sajewicz AM; Ogden KM; Dance DR
Med Phys; 2003 Mar; 30(3):442-8. PubMed ID: 12674245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. CBCT-DRRs superior to CT-DRRs for target-tracking applications for pancreatic SBRT.
Madden L; Ahmed A; Stewart M; Chrystall D; Mylonas A; Brown R; Nguyen DT; Keall P; Booth J
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2024 Apr; 10(3):. PubMed ID: 38588646
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A digitally reconstructed radiograph algorithm calculated from first principles.
Staub D; Murphy MJ
Med Phys; 2013 Jan; 40(1):011902. PubMed ID: 23298093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Investigating the use of an antiscatter grid in chest radiography for average adults with a computed radiography imaging system.
Moore CS; Wood TJ; Avery G; Balcam S; Needler L; Smith A; Saunderson JR; Beavis AW
Br J Radiol; 2015 Mar; 88(1047):20140613. PubMed ID: 25571914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Use of a computer simulator to investigate optimized tube voltage for chest imaging of average patients with a digital radiography (DR) imaging system.
Moore CS; Wood T; Avery G; Balcam S; Needler L; Joshi H; Ahmed N; Saunderson J; Beavis A
Br J Radiol; 2019 Dec; 92(1104):20190470. PubMed ID: 31559857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A framework for optimising the radiographic technique in digital X-ray imaging.
Samei E; Dobbins JT; Lo JY; Tornai MP
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):220-9. PubMed ID: 15933112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Automatic exposure control calibration and optimisation for abdomen, pelvis and lumbar spine imaging with an Agfa computed radiography system.
Moore CS; Wood TJ; Avery G; Balcam S; Needler L; Joshi H; Saunderson JR; Beavis AW
Phys Med Biol; 2016 Nov; 61(21):N551-N564. PubMed ID: 27716642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A software tool of digital tomosynthesis application for patient positioning in radiotherapy.
Yan H; Dai JR
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 17(2):174-193. PubMed ID: 27074482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Simulation of X-ray projections on GPU: Benchmarking gVirtualXray with clinically realistic phantoms.
Pointon JL; Wen T; Tugwell-Allsup J; Sújar A; Létang JM; Vidal FP
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2023 Jun; 234():107500. PubMed ID: 37030136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Correlation between the signal-to-noise ratio improvement factor (KSNR) and clinical image quality for chest imaging with a computed radiography system.
Moore CS; Wood TJ; Saunderson JR; Beavis AW
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Dec; 60(23):9047-58. PubMed ID: 26540441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Development of a computer simulation technique for low-dose chest radiographs: a phantom study.
Murakami R; Katsuragawa S
Radiol Phys Technol; 2020 Mar; 13(1):111-118. PubMed ID: 32026403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The influence of anatomical noise on optimal beam quality in mammography.
Cederström B; Fredenberg E
Med Phys; 2014 Dec; 41(12):121903. PubMed ID: 25471963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Image quality, threshold contrast and mean glandular dose in CR mammography.
Jakubiak RR; Gamba HR; Neves EB; Peixoto JE
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Sep; 58(18):6565-83. PubMed ID: 24002695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Noise simulation in cone beam CT imaging with parallel computing.
Tu SJ; Shaw CC; Chen L
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Mar; 51(5):1283-97. PubMed ID: 16481694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Optimization of a flat-panel based real time dual-energy system for cardiac imaging.
Ducote JL; Xu T; Molloi S
Med Phys; 2006 Jun; 33(6):1562-8. PubMed ID: 16872063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Imaging properties of digital magnification radiography.
Boyce SJ; Samei E
Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):984-96. PubMed ID: 16696475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
