These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

461 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28742283)

  • 1. Reliability of visual and instrumental color matching.
    Igiel C; Lehmann KM; Ghinea R; Weyhrauch M; Hangx Y; Scheller H; Paravina RD
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2017 Sep; 29(5):303-308. PubMed ID: 28742283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison between visual, intraoral scanner, and spectrophotometer shade matching: A clinical study.
    Liberato WF; Barreto IC; Costa PP; de Almeida CC; Pimentel W; Tiossi R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Feb; 121(2):271-275. PubMed ID: 30722987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Visual and instrumental evaluation of color match ability of 2 shade guides on a ceramic system.
    Öngül D; Şermet B; Balkaya MC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Jul; 108(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 22765984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Visual and instrumental agreement in dental shade selection: three distinct observer populations and shade matching protocols.
    Della Bona A; Barrett AA; Rosa V; Pinzetta C
    Dent Mater; 2009 Feb; 25(2):276-81. PubMed ID: 19019420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Visual and instrumental shade matching using CIELAB and CIEDE2000 color difference formulas.
    Pecho OE; Ghinea R; Alessandretti R; Pérez MM; Della Bona A
    Dent Mater; 2016 Jan; 32(1):82-92. PubMed ID: 26631341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of human raters and an intra-oral spectrophotometer.
    Browning WD; Chan DC; Blalock JS; Brackett MG
    Oper Dent; 2009; 34(3):337-43. PubMed ID: 19544824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparing the effectiveness of shade measurement by intraoral scanner, digital spectrophotometer, and visual shade assessment.
    Czigola A; Róth I; Vitai V; Fehér D; Hermann P; Borbély J
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2021 Dec; 33(8):1166-1174. PubMed ID: 34397163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Analysis of Shade Matching in Natural Dentitions Using Intraoral Digital Spectrophotometer in LED and Filtered LED Light Sources.
    Chitrarsu VK; Chidambaranathan AS; Balasubramaniam M
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Jan; 28(1):e68-e73. PubMed ID: 29086458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Performance assessment of dental shade guides.
    Paravina RD
    J Dent; 2009; 37 Suppl 1():e15-20. PubMed ID: 19329240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Influence of Dental Shade Guides and Experience on the Accuracy of Shade Matching.
    Nakhaei M; Ghanbarzadeh J; Amirinejad S; Alavi S; Rajatihaghi H
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Jan; 17(1):22-6. PubMed ID: 27084858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Visual and instrumental coverage error of two dental shade guides: an in vivo study.
    Ruiz-López J; Perez MM; Lucena C; Pulgar R; López-Toruño A; Tejada-Casado M; Ghinea R
    Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Sep; 26(9):5961-5968. PubMed ID: 35639206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Repeatability and reliability of human eye in visual shade selection.
    Özat PB; Tuncel İ; Eroğlu E
    J Oral Rehabil; 2013 Dec; 40(12):958-64. PubMed ID: 24127905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of different light sources on tooth shade selection.
    Śmielecka M; Dorocka-Bobkowska B
    Dent Med Probl; 2020; 57(1):61-66. PubMed ID: 32068979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical performance of a newly developed spectrophotometric system on tooth color reproduction.
    Da Silva JD; Park SE; Weber HP; Ishikawa-Nagai S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 May; 99(5):361-8. PubMed ID: 18456047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Selecting VITA classical shades with the VITA 3D-master shade guide.
    Zenthöfer A; Wiesberg S; Hildenbrandt A; Reinelt G; Rammelsberg P; Hassel AJ
    Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(4):376-82. PubMed ID: 25010883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Shading of ceramic crowns using digital tooth shade matching devices.
    Baltzer A; Kaufmann-Jinoian V
    Int J Comput Dent; 2005 Apr; 8(2):129-52. PubMed ID: 16201397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Lightness, chroma and hue differences on visual shade matching.
    Pecho OE; Pérez MM; Ghinea R; Della Bona A
    Dent Mater; 2016 Nov; 32(11):1362-1373. PubMed ID: 27614615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison between conventional visual and spectrophotometric methods for shade selection.
    Judeh A; Al-Wahadni A
    Quintessence Int; 2009 Oct; 40(9):e69-79. PubMed ID: 19862392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Outcomes of visual tooth shade selection performed by operators with different experience.
    Yılmaz B; Irmak Ö; Yaman BC
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2019 Sep; 31(5):500-507. PubMed ID: 31228358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reliability of conventional shade guides in teeth color determination.
    Todorović A; Todorović A; Gostović AS; Lazić V; Milicić B; Djurisić S
    Vojnosanit Pregl; 2013 Oct; 70(10):929-34. PubMed ID: 24313174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.