193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28742591)
1. Sonographic Tips for Evaluation of Adnexal Masses in Pregnancy.
Canavan TP
Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Sep; 60(3):575-585. PubMed ID: 28742591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Doppler sonography of adnexal masses: the predictive value of the pulsatility index in benign and malignant disease.
Salem S; White LM; Lai J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Nov; 163(5):1147-50. PubMed ID: 7976891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Differentiation of benign and malignant adnexal masses: relative value of gray-scale, color Doppler, and spectral Doppler sonography.
Stein SM; Laifer-Narin S; Johnson MB; Roman LD; Muderspach LI; Tyszka JM; Ralls PW
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Feb; 164(2):381-6. PubMed ID: 7839975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnosis and Management of Adnexal Masses.
Biggs WS; Marks ST
Am Fam Physician; 2016 Apr; 93(8):676-81. PubMed ID: 27175840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Difficulties in differential diagnosis of adnexal masses during pregnancy: the role of greyscale and color doppler sonography].
Czekierdowski A; Bednarek W; Rogowska W; Kotarski J
Ginekol Pol; 2001 Dec; 72(12A):1281-6. PubMed ID: 11883264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Imaging of Adnexal Masses.
Thakur M; Timmerman D
Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Mar; 60(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 28005597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prospective external validation of the 'ovarian crescent sign' as a single ultrasound parameter to distinguish between benign and malignant adnexal pathology.
Van Holsbeke C; Van Belle V; Leone FP; Guerriero S; Paladini D; Melis GB; Greggi S; Fischerova D; De Jonge E; Neven P; Bourne T; Valentin L; Van Huffel S; Timmerman D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Jul; 36(1):81-7. PubMed ID: 20217895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Sonographic diagnosis of presumed benign ovarian tumors].
Marret H; Cayrol M
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2013 Dec; 42(8):730-43. PubMed ID: 24200073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Contrast-enhanced sonography in the examination of benign and malignant adnexal masses.
Ordén MR; Gudmundsson S; Kirkinen P
J Ultrasound Med; 2000 Nov; 19(11):783-8. PubMed ID: 11065267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A prospective evaluation of transvaginal sonography for detection of ovarian disease.
DiSantis DJ; Scatarige JC; Kemp G; Given FT; Hsiu JG; Cramer MS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Jul; 161(1):91-4. PubMed ID: 8517330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Management of the adnexal mass in pregnancy.
Goh W; Bohrer J; Zalud I
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Apr; 26(2):49-53. PubMed ID: 24614018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Adnexal mass with pelvic pain.
Webb EM; Green GE; Scoutt LM
Radiol Clin North Am; 2004 Mar; 42(2):329-48. PubMed ID: 15136020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Predictors of persistence of adnexal masses in pregnancy.
Bernhard LM; Klebba PK; Gray DL; Mutch DG
Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Apr; 93(4):585-9. PubMed ID: 10214838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Adding a single CA 125 measurement to ultrasound imaging performed by an experienced examiner does not improve preoperative discrimination between benign and malignant adnexal masses.
Valentin L; Jurkovic D; Van Calster B; Testa A; Van Holsbeke C; Bourne T; Vergote I; Van Huffel S; Timmerman D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Sep; 34(3):345-54. PubMed ID: 19585547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Performance of the IOTA ADNEX model in preoperative discrimination of adnexal masses in a gynecological oncology center.
Araujo KG; Jales RM; Pereira PN; Yoshida A; de Angelo Andrade L; Sarian LO; Derchain S
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jun; 49(6):778-783. PubMed ID: 27194129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sonography of ovarian masses: poor sensitivity of resistive index for identifying malignant lesions.
Levine D; Feldstein VA; Babcook CJ; Filly RA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Jun; 162(6):1355-9. PubMed ID: 8191998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Complex US adnexal masses during pregnancy: Is pelvic MR imaging accurate for characterization?
Thomassin-Naggara I; Fedida B; Sadowski E; Chevrier MC; Chabbert-Buffet N; Ballester M; Tavolaro S; Darai E
Eur J Radiol; 2017 Aug; 93():200-208. PubMed ID: 28668416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. External validation of IOTA simple descriptors and simple rules for classifying adnexal masses.
Alcázar JL; Pascual MA; Graupera B; Aubá M; Errasti T; Olartecoechea B; Ruiz-Zambrana A; Hereter L; Ajossa S; Guerriero S
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Sep; 48(3):397-402. PubMed ID: 26748432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Discrimination between benign and malignant adnexal masses by specialist ultrasound examination versus serum CA-125.
Van Calster B; Timmerman D; Bourne T; Testa AC; Van Holsbeke C; Domali E; Jurkovic D; Neven P; Van Huffel S; Valentin L
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Nov; 99(22):1706-14. PubMed ID: 18000221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The value of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of adnexal masses.
Satoskar P; Deshpande A
J Postgrad Med; 1991 Jan; 37(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 1941690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
