327 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28742783)
1. End-Expiratory Occlusion Test Predicts Fluid Responsiveness in Patients With Protective Ventilation in the Operating Room.
Biais M; Larghi M; Henriot J; de Courson H; Sesay M; Nouette-Gaulain K
Anesth Analg; 2017 Dec; 125(6):1889-1895. PubMed ID: 28742783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Tidal volume challenge to predict fluid responsiveness in the operating room: An observational study.
Messina A; Montagnini C; Cammarota G; De Rosa S; Giuliani F; Muratore L; Della Corte F; Navalesi P; Cecconi M
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2019 Aug; 36(8):583-591. PubMed ID: 31021879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. End-expiratory occlusion maneuver to predict fluid responsiveness in the intensive care unit: an echocardiographic study.
Georges D; de Courson H; Lanchon R; Sesay M; Nouette-Gaulain K; Biais M
Crit Care; 2018 Feb; 22(1):32. PubMed ID: 29415773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Changes in Stroke Volume Induced by Lung Recruitment Maneuver Predict Fluid Responsiveness in Mechanically Ventilated Patients in the Operating Room.
Biais M; Lanchon R; Sesay M; Le Gall L; Pereira B; Futier E; Nouette-Gaulain K
Anesthesiology; 2017 Feb; 126(2):260-267. PubMed ID: 27922547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prediction of fluid responsiveness in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients ventilated with low tidal volume and high positive end-expiratory pressure.
Huang CC; Fu JY; Hu HC; Kao KC; Chen NH; Hsieh MJ; Tsai YH
Crit Care Med; 2008 Oct; 36(10):2810-6. PubMed ID: 18766099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of stroke volume variations obtained with the pressure recording analytic method.
Biais M; Cottenceau V; Stecken L; Jean M; Ottolenghi L; Roullet S; Quinart A; Sztark F
Crit Care Med; 2012 Apr; 40(4):1186-91. PubMed ID: 22425817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. End-expiratory occlusion manoeuvre does not accurately predict fluid responsiveness in the operating theatre.
Guinot PG; Godart J; de Broca B; Bernard E; Lorne E; Dupont H
Br J Anaesth; 2014 Jun; 112(6):1050-4. PubMed ID: 24598390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mini-fluid Challenge of 100 ml of Crystalloid Predicts Fluid Responsiveness in the Operating Room.
Biais M; de Courson H; Lanchon R; Pereira B; Bardonneau G; Griton M; Sesay M; Nouette-Gaulain K
Anesthesiology; 2017 Sep; 127(3):450-456. PubMed ID: 28640019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Can carotid artery Doppler variations induced by the end-expiratory occlusion maneuver predict fluid responsiveness in septic shock patients?
D'Arrigo S; Dell'Anna AM; Sandroni C; Messina A; Cacciola S; Pacini C; Antonelli M
Crit Care; 2023 Apr; 27(1):153. PubMed ID: 37076861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of Fluid Responsiveness in Prone Neurosurgical Patients Undergoing Protective Ventilation: Role of Dynamic Indices, Tidal Volume Challenge, and End-Expiratory Occlusion Test.
Messina A; Montagnini C; Cammarota G; Giuliani F; Muratore L; Baggiani M; Bennett V; Della Corte F; Navalesi P; Cecconi M
Anesth Analg; 2020 Mar; 130(3):752-761. PubMed ID: 31651455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Changes in peripheral perfusion index during intraoperative end-expiratory occlusion tests do not predict the response to fluid administration in patients undergoing lung protective ventilation.
Iizuka Y; Sanui M; Otsuka Y; Yoshinaga K; Nakatomi T; Lefor AK
J Anesth; 2021 Dec; 35(6):837-843. PubMed ID: 34414489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Stroke volume and pulse pressure variation are good predictors of fluid responsiveness in sepsis patients].
Drvar Z; Pavlek M; Drvar V; Tomasević B; Baronica R; Perić M
Acta Med Croatica; 2013 Dec; 67(5):407-14. PubMed ID: 24979881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Changes in Pulse Pressure Variation or Stroke Volume Variation After a "Tidal Volume Challenge" Reliably Predict Fluid Responsiveness During Low Tidal Volume Ventilation.
Myatra SN; Prabu NR; Divatia JV; Monnet X; Kulkarni AP; Teboul JL
Crit Care Med; 2017 Mar; 45(3):415-421. PubMed ID: 27922879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Hemodynamic Changes via the Lung Recruitment Maneuver Can Predict Fluid Responsiveness in Stroke Volume and Arterial Pressure During One-Lung Ventilation.
Kimura A; Suehiro K; Juri T; Fujimoto Y; Yoshida H; Tanaka K; Mori T; Nishikawa K
Anesth Analg; 2021 Jul; 133(1):44-52. PubMed ID: 33687175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pulse Pressure Variation Adjusted by Respiratory Changes in Pleural Pressure, Rather Than by Tidal Volume, Reliably Predicts Fluid Responsiveness in Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.
Liu Y; Wei LQ; Li GQ; Yu X; Li GF; Li YM
Crit Care Med; 2016 Feb; 44(2):342-51. PubMed ID: 26457754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Utility of changes in end-tidal carbon dioxide after volume expansion to assess fluid responsiveness in the operating room: a prospective observational study.
de Courson H; Chauvet J; Le Gall L; Georges D; Boyer P; Verchère E; Nouette-Gaulain K; Biais M
Br J Anaesth; 2020 Nov; 125(5):672-679. PubMed ID: 32863016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Predicting volume responsiveness by using the end-expiratory occlusion in mechanically ventilated intensive care unit patients.
Monnet X; Osman D; Ridel C; Lamia B; Richard C; Teboul JL
Crit Care Med; 2009 Mar; 37(3):951-6. PubMed ID: 19237902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A challenge with 5 cmH2O of positive end-expiratory pressure predicts fluid responsiveness in neurosurgery patients with protective ventilation: an observational study.
Ali A; Aygun E; Abdullah T; Bolsoy-Deveci S; Orhan-Sungur M; Canbaz M; Ozkan Akinci I
Minerva Anestesiol; 2019 Nov; 85(11):1184-1192. PubMed ID: 31213047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Change in cardiac output during Trendelenburg maneuver is a reliable predictor of fluid responsiveness in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome in the prone position under protective ventilation.
Yonis H; Bitker L; Aublanc M; Perinel Ragey S; Riad Z; Lissonde F; Louf-Durier A; Debord S; Gobert F; Tapponnier R; Guérin C; Richard JC
Crit Care; 2017 Dec; 21(1):295. PubMed ID: 29208025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The ability of pulse pressure variations obtained with CNAP™ device to predict fluid responsiveness in the operating room.
Biais M; Stecken L; Ottolenghi L; Roullet S; Quinart A; Masson F; Sztark F
Anesth Analg; 2011 Sep; 113(3):523-8. PubMed ID: 21642606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
