217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28743170)
1. Current trends in patient enrollment for robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy in Belgium.
Albisinni S; Joniau S; Quackels T; De Coster G; Dekuyper P; Van Cleynenbreugel B; Van Damme N; Van Eycken E; Ameye F; Roumeguère T;
Cancer; 2017 Nov; 123(21):4139-4146. PubMed ID: 28743170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS
J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intermediate-term cancer control outcomes in prostate cancer patients treated with robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a multi-institutional analysis.
Abdollah F; Dalela D; Sood A; Sammon J; Jeong W; Beyer B; Fossati N; Rogers CG; Diaz-Insua M; Peabody J; Haese A; Montorsi F; Graefen M; Briganti A; Menon M
World J Urol; 2016 Oct; 34(10):1357-66. PubMed ID: 26873596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Current Management of pT3b Prostate Cancer After Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy.
Poelaert F; Joniau S; Roumeguère T; Ameye F; De Coster G; Dekuyper P; Quackels T; Van Cleynenbreugel B; Van Damme N; Van Eycken E; Mottrie A; Lumen N;
Eur Urol Oncol; 2019 Feb; 2(1):110-117. PubMed ID: 30929840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Development and External Validation of Nomograms To Predict Adverse Pathological Characteristics After Robotic Prostatectomy: Results of a Prospective, Multi-institutional, Nationwide series.
Tosco L; De Coster G; Roumeguère T; Everaerts W; Quackels T; Dekuyper P; Van Cleynenbreugel B; Van Damme N; Van Eycken E; Ameye F; Joniau S;
Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Sep; 1(4):338-345. PubMed ID: 31100256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of Variations in Prostatic Apex Shape on Apical Margin Positive Rate After Radical Prostatectomy: Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy vs Open Radical Prostatectomy.
Yu YD; Lee M; Hong SK; Byun SS; Lee SE; Lee S
J Endourol; 2018 Jan; 32(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 29212368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. When Should a Positive Surgical Margin Ring a Bell? An Analysis of a Multi-Institutional Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy Database.
Abdollah F; Moschini M; Sood A; Sammon J; Dalela D; Hsu L; Beyer B; Haese A; Graefen M; Gandaglia G; Montorsi F; Briganti A; Menon M
J Endourol; 2016 Feb; 30(2):201-7. PubMed ID: 26415003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Long-term biochemical recurrence rates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: analysis of a single-center series of patients with a minimum follow-up of 5 years.
Suardi N; Ficarra V; Willemsen P; De Wil P; Gallina A; De Naeyer G; Schatteman P; Montorsi F; Carpentier P; Mottrie A
Urology; 2012 Jan; 79(1):133-8. PubMed ID: 22088567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Utilization and impact of surgical technique on the performance of pelvic lymph node dissection at radical prostatectomy: Results from the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital database.
McGinley KF; Sun X; Howard LE; Aronson WJ; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Cooperberg MR; Freedland SJ
Int J Urol; 2016 Mar; 23(3):241-6. PubMed ID: 26667212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparing High-Intensity Focal Ultrasound Hemiablation to Robotic Radical Prostatectomy in the Management of Unilateral Prostate Cancer: A Matched-Pair Analysis.
Albisinni S; Aoun F; Bellucci S; Biaou I; Limani K; Hawaux E; Peltier A; van Velthoven R
J Endourol; 2017 Jan; 31(1):14-19. PubMed ID: 27799004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The addition of robotic surgery to an established laparoscopic radical prostatectomy program: effect on positive surgical margins.
Trabulsi EJ; Linden RA; Gomella LG; McGinnis DE; Strup SE; Lallas CD
Can J Urol; 2008 Apr; 15(2):3994-9. PubMed ID: 18405448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparing conventional laparoscopic to robotic-assisted extended pelvic lymph node dissection in men with intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer: a matched-pair analysis.
Albisinni S; Aoun F; LE Dinh D; Zanaty M; Hawaux E; Peltier A; VAN Velthoven R
Minerva Urol Nefrol; 2017 Feb; 69(1):101-107. PubMed ID: 28009151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. External validation of the Briganti nomogram to estimate the probability of specimen-confined disease in patients with high-risk prostate cancer.
Roumiguié M; Beauval JB; Filleron T; Benoit T; Rischmann P; de la Taille A; Salomon L; Soulié M; Malavaud B; Ploussard G
BJU Int; 2014 Dec; 114(6b):E113-E119. PubMed ID: 24684584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. 3D vs 2D laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in organ-confined prostate cancer: comparison of operative data and pentafecta rates: a single cohort study.
Bove P; Iacovelli V; Celestino F; De Carlo F; Vespasiani G; Finazzi Agrò E
BMC Urol; 2015 Feb; 15(1):12. PubMed ID: 25887253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biochemical recurrence-free survival after robotic-assisted laparoscopic vs open radical prostatectomy for intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer.
Ritch CR; You C; May AT; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Penson DF; Chang SS; Cookson MS; Smith JA; Barocas DA
Urology; 2014 Jun; 83(6):1309-15. PubMed ID: 24746665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Minimally invasive radical prostatectomy: transition from pure laparoscopic to robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Trabulsi EJ; Zola JC; Colon-Herdman A; Heckman JE; Gomella LG; Lallas CD
Arch Esp Urol; 2011 Oct; 64(8):823-9. PubMed ID: 22052763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Applicability of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in renal allograft recipients.
Wagener N; Nyarangi-Dix JN; Teber D; Zeier M; Hohenfellner M
Transplant Proc; 2012 Jun; 44(5):1287-92. PubMed ID: 22664002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A direct comparison of robotic assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single institution experience.
Rozet F; Jaffe J; Braud G; Harmon J; Cathelineau X; Barret E; Vallancien G
J Urol; 2007 Aug; 178(2):478-82. PubMed ID: 17561160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Radical prostatectomy improves progression-free and cancer-specific survival in men with lymph node positive prostate cancer in the prostate-specific antigen era: a confirmatory study.
Steuber T; Budäus L; Walz J; Zorn KC; Schlomm T; Chun F; Ahyai S; Fisch M; Sauter G; Huland H; Graefen M; Haese A
BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1755-61. PubMed ID: 20942833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Radical prostatectomy represents an effective treatment in patients with specimen-confined high pathological Gleason score prostate cancer.
Lughezzani G; Gallina A; Larcher A; Briganti A; Capitanio U; Suardi N; Lista G; Abrate A; Sangalli MN; Buffi N; Cestari A; Guazzoni G; Rigatti P; Montorsi F
BJU Int; 2013 May; 111(5):723-30. PubMed ID: 22487441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
