These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28743459)

  • 1. Illuminating the conceptual structure of the space of moral violations with searchlight representational similarity analysis.
    Wasserman EA; Chakroff A; Saxe R; Young L
    Neuroimage; 2017 Oct; 159():371-387. PubMed ID: 28743459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Judgments of moral responsibility and wrongness for intentional and accidental harm and purity violations.
    Parkinson M; Byrne RMJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Mar; 71(3):779-789. PubMed ID: 28059634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Asking 'why?' enhances theory of mind when evaluating harm but not purity violations.
    Dungan JA; Young L
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2019 Jul; 14(7):699-708. PubMed ID: 31269193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dissociable neural systems for moral judgment of anti- and pro-social lying.
    Hayashi A; Abe N; Fujii T; Ito A; Ueno A; Koseki Y; Mugikura S; Takahashi S; Mori E
    Brain Res; 2014 Mar; 1556():46-56. PubMed ID: 24530270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is morality unified? Evidence that distinct neural systems underlie moral judgments of harm, dishonesty, and disgust.
    Parkinson C; Sinnott-Armstrong W; Koralus PE; Mendelovici A; McGeer V; Wheatley T
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Oct; 23(10):3162-80. PubMed ID: 21452951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The relevance of moral norms in distinct relational contexts: Purity versus harm norms regulate self-directed actions.
    Dungan JA; Chakroff A; Young L
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0173405. PubMed ID: 28278214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Examining overlap in behavioral and neural representations of morals, facts, and preferences.
    Theriault J; Waytz A; Heiphetz L; Young L
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2017 Nov; 146(11):1586-1605. PubMed ID: 28805441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Many moral buttons or just one? Evidence from emotional facial expressions.
    Franchin L; Geipel J; Hadjichristidis C; Surian L
    Cogn Emot; 2019 Aug; 33(5):943-958. PubMed ID: 30200861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Is moral beauty different from facial beauty? Evidence from an fMRI study.
    Wang T; Mo L; Mo C; Tan LH; Cant JS; Zhong L; Cupchik G
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2015 Jun; 10(6):814-23. PubMed ID: 25298010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. When minds matter for moral judgment: intent information is neurally encoded for harmful but not impure acts.
    Chakroff A; Dungan J; Koster-Hale J; Brown A; Saxe R; Young L
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2016 Mar; 11(3):476-84. PubMed ID: 26628642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An FMRI investigation of spontaneous mental state inference for moral judgment.
    Young L; Saxe R
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Jul; 21(7):1396-405. PubMed ID: 18823250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Brain regions that represent amodal conceptual knowledge.
    Fairhall SL; Caramazza A
    J Neurosci; 2013 Jun; 33(25):10552-8. PubMed ID: 23785167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The neural basis of belief encoding and integration in moral judgment.
    Young L; Saxe R
    Neuroimage; 2008 May; 40(4):1912-20. PubMed ID: 18342544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The neural bases of cognitive conflict and control in moral judgment.
    Greene JD; Nystrom LE; Engell AD; Darley JM; Cohen JD
    Neuron; 2004 Oct; 44(2):389-400. PubMed ID: 15473975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Neural basis of moral verdict and moral deliberation.
    Schaich Borg J; Sinnott-Armstrong W; Calhoun VD; Kiehl KA
    Soc Neurosci; 2011; 6(4):398-413. PubMed ID: 21590588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Vicarious punishment of moral violations in naturalistic drama narratives predicts cortical synchronization.
    Weber R; Hopp FR; Eden A; Fisher JT; Lee HE
    Neuroimage; 2024 Apr; 292():120613. PubMed ID: 38631616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Neural correlates of regulating negative emotions related to moral violations.
    Harenski CL; Hamann S
    Neuroimage; 2006 Mar; 30(1):313-24. PubMed ID: 16249098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Is purity a distinct and homogeneous domain in moral psychology?
    Kollareth D; Brownell H; Durán JI; Russell JA
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2023 Jan; 152(1):211-235. PubMed ID: 35901410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [A preliminary fMRI study of moral judgment task in high functioning autistic children].
    Hiraishi H; Hashimoto T; Mori K; Ito H; Harada M
    No To Hattatsu; 2007 Sep; 39(5):360-5. PubMed ID: 17879610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Easy on the mind, easy on the wrongdoer: discrepantly fluent violations are deemed less morally wrong.
    Laham SM; Alter AL; Goodwin GP
    Cognition; 2009 Sep; 112(3):462-6. PubMed ID: 19573863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.