BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

348 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28743644)

  • 1. Species trees from consensus single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data: Testing phylogenetic approaches with simulated and empirical data.
    Schmidt-Lebuhn AN; Aitken NC; Chuah A
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2017 Nov; 116():192-201. PubMed ID: 28743644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Species Tree Inference with SNP Data.
    Matschiner M
    Methods Mol Biol; 2022; 2512():23-44. PubMed ID: 35817997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Short Tree, Long Tree, Right Tree, Wrong Tree: New Acquisition Bias Corrections for Inferring SNP Phylogenies.
    Leaché AD; Banbury BL; Felsenstein J; de Oca AN; Stamatakis A
    Syst Biol; 2015 Nov; 64(6):1032-47. PubMed ID: 26227865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bayesian inference of phylogenetic networks from bi-allelic genetic markers.
    Zhu J; Wen D; Yu Y; Meudt HM; Nakhleh L
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2018 Jan; 14(1):e1005932. PubMed ID: 29320496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of missing data on species tree estimation under the coalescent.
    Hovmöller R; Knowles LL; Kubatko LS
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2013 Dec; 69(3):1057-62. PubMed ID: 23769751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Theoretical and Practical Considerations when using Retroelement Insertions to Estimate Species Trees in the Anomaly Zone.
    Molloy EK; Gatesy J; Springer MS
    Syst Biol; 2022 Apr; 71(3):721-740. PubMed ID: 34677617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The gene tree delusion.
    Springer MS; Gatesy J
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2016 Jan; 94(Pt A):1-33. PubMed ID: 26238460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quartet inference from SNP data under the coalescent model.
    Chifman J; Kubatko L
    Bioinformatics; 2014 Dec; 30(23):3317-24. PubMed ID: 25104814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bayesian Inference of Species Trees using Diffusion Models.
    Stoltz M; Baeumer B; Bouckaert R; Fox C; Hiscott G; Bryant D
    Syst Biol; 2021 Jan; 70(1):145-161. PubMed ID: 33005955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bayesian and maximum likelihood phylogenetic analyses of protein sequence data under relative branch-length differences and model violation.
    Mar JC; Harlow TJ; Ragan MA
    BMC Evol Biol; 2005 Jan; 5():8. PubMed ID: 15676079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Species delimitation using genome-wide SNP data.
    Leaché AD; Fujita MK; Minin VN; Bouckaert RR
    Syst Biol; 2014 Jul; 63(4):534-42. PubMed ID: 24627183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Limitations of locally sampled characters in phylogenetic analyses of sparse supermatrices.
    Simmons MP
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2014 May; 74():1-14. PubMed ID: 24530637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Species trees from gene trees: reconstructing Bayesian posterior distributions of a species phylogeny using estimated gene tree distributions.
    Liu L; Pearl DK
    Syst Biol; 2007 Jun; 56(3):504-14. PubMed ID: 17562474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Species delimitation using Bayes factors: simulations and application to the Sceloporus scalaris species group (Squamata: Phrynosomatidae).
    Grummer JA; Bryson RW; Reeder TW
    Syst Biol; 2014 Mar; 63(2):119-33. PubMed ID: 24262383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Computational Performance and Statistical Accuracy of *BEAST and Comparisons with Other Methods.
    Ogilvie HA; Heled J; Xie D; Drummond AJ
    Syst Biol; 2016 May; 65(3):381-96. PubMed ID: 26821913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Efficient Bayesian Species Tree Inference under the Multispecies Coalescent.
    Rannala B; Yang Z
    Syst Biol; 2017 Sep; 66(5):823-842. PubMed ID: 28053140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The accuracy of species tree estimation under simulation: a comparison of methods.
    Leaché AD; Rannala B
    Syst Biol; 2011 Mar; 60(2):126-37. PubMed ID: 21088009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Parsimony, not Bayesian analysis, recovers more stratigraphically congruent phylogenetic trees.
    Sansom RS; Choate PG; Keating JN; Randle E
    Biol Lett; 2018 Jun; 14(6):. PubMed ID: 29925561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of missing data on topological inference using a Total Evidence approach.
    Guillerme T; Cooper N
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2016 Jan; 94(Pt A):146-58. PubMed ID: 26335040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Collapsing dubiously resolved gene-tree branches in phylogenomic coalescent analyses.
    Simmons MP; Gatesy J
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2021 May; 158():107092. PubMed ID: 33545272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.