199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28743664)
1. Comparative analysis of imaging techniques for diagnostic accuracy of peri-implant bone defects: a meta-analysis.
Bohner LOL; Mukai E; Oderich E; Porporatti AL; Pacheco-Pereira C; Tortamano P; De Luca Canto G
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2017 Oct; 124(4):432-440.e5. PubMed ID: 28743664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography, dental magnetic resonance imaging, and intraoral radiography for detecting peri-implant bone defects at single zirconia implants-An in vitro study.
Hilgenfeld T; Juerchott A; Deisenhofer UK; Krisam J; Rammelsberg P; Heiland S; Bendszus M; Schwindling FS
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Sep; 29(9):922-930. PubMed ID: 30112833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Detection of peri-implant bone defects with different radiographic techniques - a human cadaver study.
Kühl S; Zürcher S; Zitzmann NU; Filippi A; Payer M; Dagassan-Berndt D
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 May; 27(5):529-34. PubMed ID: 26059443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of cone beam computed tomography and conventional periapical radiography at detecting peri-implant bone defects.
Dave M; Davies J; Wilson R; Palmer R
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Jun; 24(6):671-8. PubMed ID: 22458628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diagnostic accuracy of CBCT versus intraoral imaging for assessment of peri-implant bone defects.
Song D; Shujaat S; de Faria Vasconcelos K; Huang Y; Politis C; Lambrichts I; Jacobs R
BMC Med Imaging; 2021 Feb; 21(1):23. PubMed ID: 33568085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. CBCT vs other imaging modalities to assess peri-implant bone and diagnose complications: a systematic review.
Jacobs R; Vranckx M; Vanderstuyft T; Quirynen M; Salmon B
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2018; 11 Suppl 1():77-92. PubMed ID: 30109301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of peri-implant defects at titanium and zirconium dioxide implants by means of periapical radiographs and cone beam computed tomography: An in-vitro examination.
Steiger-Ronay V; Krcmaric Z; Schmidlin PR; Sahrmann P; Wiedemeier DB; Benic GI
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Dec; 29(12):1195-1201. PubMed ID: 30387207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Digital volume tomography in the diagnosis of peri-implant defects: an in vitro study on native pig mandibles.
Mengel R; Kruse B; Flores-de-Jacoby L
J Periodontol; 2006 Jul; 77(7):1234-41. PubMed ID: 16805688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnostic performance of cone beam computed tomography in assessing peri-implant bone loss: A systematic review.
Pelekos G; Acharya A; Tonetti MS; Bornstein MM
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 May; 29(5):443-464. PubMed ID: 29578266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In vitro diagnostic accuracy of low-dose CBCT for evaluation of peri-implant bone lesions.
Schwindling FS; Hilgenfeld T; Weber D; Kosinski MA; Rammelsberg P; Tasaka A
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2019 Dec; 30(12):1200-1208. PubMed ID: 31505065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effectiveness of Periapical Radiography Versus Cone Beam Computed Tomography with Different Kilovoltage Settings in the Detection of Chemically Created Peri-implant Bone Defects: An In Vitro Study.
Pinheiro LR; Scarfe WC; de Oliveira Sales MA; Gaia BF; Cortes AR; Gusmão Paraiso Cavalcanti M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017; 32(4):741-750. PubMed ID: 28708906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Defect morphology, bone thickness, exposure settings and examiner experience affect the diagnostic accuracy of standardized digital periapical radiographic images but not of cone beam computed tomography in the detection of peri-implant osseous defects: An in vitro study.
Pelekos G; Tse JMN; Ho D; Tonetti MS
J Clin Periodontol; 2019 Dec; 46(12):1294-1302. PubMed ID: 31536645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparing the diagnostic efficacy of intraoral radiography and cone beam computed tomography volume registration in the detection of mandibular alveolar bone defects.
Green PT; Mol A; Moretti AJ; Tyndall DA; Kohltfarber HB
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2019 Aug; 128(2):176-185. PubMed ID: 30685391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Detection of periapical bone defects in human jaws using cone beam computed tomography and intraoral radiography.
Patel S; Dawood A; Mannocci F; Wilson R; Pitt Ford T
Int Endod J; 2009 Jun; 42(6):507-15. PubMed ID: 19298574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Zirconia implants interfere with the evaluation of peri-implant bone defects in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images even with artifact reduction, a pilot study.
Kuusisto N; Abushahba F; Syrjänen S; Huumonen S; Vallittu P; Närhi T
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2023 Nov; 52(8):20230252. PubMed ID: 37641961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnostic Accuracy of Cone-beam Computed Tomography and Conventional Radiography on Apical Periodontitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Leonardi Dutra K; Haas L; Porporatti AL; Flores-Mir C; Nascimento Santos J; Mezzomo LA; Corrêa M; De Luca Canto G
J Endod; 2016 Mar; 42(3):356-64. PubMed ID: 26902914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Detection of periodontal bone loss using digital intraoral and cone beam computed tomography images: an in vitro assessment of bony and/or infrabony defects.
Vandenberghe B; Jacobs R; Yang J
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Jul; 37(5):252-60. PubMed ID: 18606746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography in detecting alveolar bone dehiscences and fenestrations.
Sun L; Zhang L; Shen G; Wang B; Fang B
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Mar; 147(3):313-23. PubMed ID: 25726398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of cone beam computed tomography in assessing peri-implant bone defect regeneration: a histologically controlled study in dogs.
Fienitz T; Schwarz F; Ritter L; Dreiseidler T; Becker J; Rothamel D
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Jul; 23(7):882-7. PubMed ID: 21707753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Detection of crestal radiolucencies around dental implants: an in vitro experimental study.
Sirin Y; Horasan S; Yaman D; Basegmez C; Tanyel C; Aral A; Guven K
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Jul; 70(7):1540-50. PubMed ID: 22698290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
