These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28744058)

  • 1. The reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Japanese orthopaedic association back pain evaluation questionnaire.
    Jung KS; Jung JH; Jang SH; Bang HS; In TS
    J Phys Ther Sci; 2017 Jul; 29(7):1250-1253. PubMed ID: 28744058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ): A validation of the reliability of the Thai version.
    Poosiripinyo T; Paholpak P; Jirarattanaphochai K; Kosuwon W; Sirichativapee W; Wisanuyotin T; Laupattarakasem P; Sukhonthamarn K; Jeeravipoolvarn P; Sakakibara T; Kasai Y
    J Orthop Sci; 2017 Jan; 22(1):34-37. PubMed ID: 27793440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire.
    Gunaydin G; Hazar Kanik Z; Karabicak GO; Sozlu U; Pala OO; Alkan ZB; Basar S; Citaker S
    J Orthop Sci; 2016 May; 21(3):295-8. PubMed ID: 26898339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Psychometric validation of the adapted Traditional Chinese version of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ).
    Cheung PWH; Wong CKH; Cheung JPY
    J Orthop Sci; 2018 Sep; 23(5):750-757. PubMed ID: 30213363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The validity and reliability of the Arabic version of the Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire: Can we implement it in Saudi Arabia?
    Alfayez SM; Bin Dous AN; Altowim AA; Alrabiei QA; Alsubaie BO; Awwad WM
    J Orthop Sci; 2017 Jul; 22(4):618-621. PubMed ID: 28416189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The reliability and validity of the Korean version of the foot function index for patients with foot complaints.
    In TS; Jung JH; Kim K; Jung KS; Cho HY
    J Phys Ther Sci; 2017 Jan; 29(1):53-56. PubMed ID: 28210038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The reliability and validity of the Korean version of the lower limb functional index.
    In TS; Jung JH; Jung KS; Cho HY
    J Phys Ther Sci; 2018 Jan; 30(1):50-52. PubMed ID: 29410565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The reliability and validity of the Korean version of the spine functional index.
    In TS
    J Phys Ther Sci; 2017 Jun; 29(6):1082-1084. PubMed ID: 28626330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Upper Limb Functional Index.
    In TS; Jung JH; Kim KJ; Lee CR; Jung KS; Cho HY
    J Phys Ther Sci; 2017 Jun; 29(6):1062-1065. PubMed ID: 28626325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ) for low back disorders: a validation study from Iran.
    Azimi P; Shahzadi S; Montazeri A
    J Orthop Sci; 2012 Sep; 17(5):521-5. PubMed ID: 22821408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire to Brazilian Portuguese.
    Poletto PR; Gobbo DKP; Gotfryd AO; Catania SN; Sousa DC; Pereira SBS
    Einstein (Sao Paulo); 2017; 15(3):313-321. PubMed ID: 29091153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment questionnaire for patients with musculoskeletal disorder.
    Jung KS; Jung JH; In TS; Cho HY
    J Phys Ther Sci; 2016 Sep; 28(9):2568-2571. PubMed ID: 27799696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the Korean version of American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons Foot and Ankle questionnaire.
    Kim JB; Kim JK; Seo SG; Lee DY
    J Foot Ankle Surg; 2015; 54(1):46-50. PubMed ID: 25441847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reliability, Stability and Validity of the Brazilian Adaptation of the Oliveira Questionnaire on Low Back Pain in Young People.
    Soccal Schwertner D; Oliveira R; Ramos Marinho AP; Benetti M; Silva Beltrame T; Capistrano R
    Acta Med Port; 2017 Oct; 30(10):691-698. PubMed ID: 29268062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire. Part 3. Validity study and establishment of the measurement scale : Subcommittee on Low Back Pain and Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation of the Clinical Outcome Committee of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association, Japan.
    Fukui M; Chiba K; Kawakami M; Kikuchi S; Konno S; Miyamoto M; Seichi A; Shimamura T; Shirado O; Taguchi T; Takahashi K; Takeshita K; Tani T; Toyama Y; Wada E; Yonenobu K; Tanaka T; Hirota Y
    J Orthop Sci; 2008 May; 13(3):173-9. PubMed ID: 18528648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reliability and Validity of the Korean Version of the Foot Function Index.
    Huh JW; Eun IS; Ko YC; Park MJ; Hwang KM; Park SH; Park TH; Park JH
    J Foot Ankle Surg; 2016; 55(4):759-61. PubMed ID: 27067199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A study of the development of the Korean version of PedsQL(TM) 3.0 cerebral palsy module and reliability and validity.
    Yun YJ; Shin YB; Kim SY; Shin MJ; Kim RJ; Oh TY
    J Phys Ther Sci; 2016 Jul; 28(7):2132-9. PubMed ID: 27512282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Simplified Chinese Version of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire: Agreement, Responsiveness, and Minimal Important Change for Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain.
    Yao M; Yang L; Zhu B; Xu BP; Chen N; Wang XT; Cheng SD; Wang YJ; Cui XJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2018 Oct; 43(20):1438-1445. PubMed ID: 29659442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of low back pain using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire for lumbar spinal disease in a multicenter study: differences in scores based on age, sex, and type of disease.
    Ohtori S; Ito T; Yamashita M; Murata Y; Morinaga T; Hirayama J; Kinoshita T; Ataka H; Koshi T; Sekikawa T; Miyagi M; Tanno T; Suzuki M; Aoki Y; Aihara T; Nakamura S; Yamaguchi K; Tauchi T; Hatakeyama K; Takata K; Sameda H; Ozawa T; Hanaoka E; Suzuki H; Akazawa T; Suseki K; Arai H; Kurokawa M; Eguchi Y; Suzuki M; Okamoto Y; Miyagi J; Yamagata M; Toyone T; Takahashi K;
    J Orthop Sci; 2010 Jan; 15(1):86-91. PubMed ID: 20151256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire. Part 2. Verification of its reliability : The Subcommittee on Low Back Pain and Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation of the Clinical Outcome Committee of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association.
    Fukui M; Chiba K; Kawakami M; Kikuchi S; Konno S; Miyamoto M; Seichi A; Shimamura T; Shirado O; Taguchi T; Takahashi K; Takeshita K; Tani T; Toyama Y; Yonenobu K; Wada E; Tanaka T; Hirota Y
    J Orthop Sci; 2007 Nov; 12(6):526-32. PubMed ID: 18040634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.