These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28744766)

  • 1. A meta-analysis of the survival-processing advantage in memory.
    Scofield JE; Buchanan EM; Kostic B
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Jun; 25(3):997-1012. PubMed ID: 28744766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Meta-analysis using effect size distributions of only statistically significant studies.
    van Assen MA; van Aert RC; Wicherts JM
    Psychol Methods; 2015 Sep; 20(3):293-309. PubMed ID: 25401773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Publication bias in ecology and evolution: an empirical assessment using the 'trim and fill' method.
    Jennions MD; Møller AP
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2002 May; 77(2):211-22. PubMed ID: 12056747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Detecting and correcting for publication bias in meta-analysis - A truncated normal distribution approach.
    Zhu Q; Carriere KC
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Sep; 27(9):2722-2741. PubMed ID: 28024447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Performance of the trim and fill method in the presence of publication bias and between-study heterogeneity.
    Peters JL; Sutton AJ; Jones DR; Abrams KR; Rushton L
    Stat Med; 2007 Nov; 26(25):4544-62. PubMed ID: 17476644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimating the proportion of studies missing for meta-analysis due to publication bias.
    Formann AK
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2008 Sep; 29(5):732-9. PubMed ID: 18586577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Meta-analysis and publication bias: How well does the FAT-PET-PEESE procedure work?
    Alinaghi N; Reed WR
    Res Synth Methods; 2018 Jun; 9(2):285-311. PubMed ID: 29532634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Conducting Meta-Analyses Based on p Values: Reservations and Recommendations for Applying p-Uniform and p-Curve.
    van Aert RC; Wicherts JM; van Assen MA
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2016 Sep; 11(5):713-729. PubMed ID: 27694466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Response to letter to the editor from Dr Rahman Shiri: The challenging topic of suicide across occupational groups.
    Niedhammer I; Milner A; Witt K; Klingelschmidt J; Khireddine-Medouni I; Alexopoulos EC; Toivanen S; Chastang JF; LaMontagne AD
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 2018 Jan; 44(1):108-110. PubMed ID: 29218357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis: An Evaluation of Selection Methods and Some Cautionary Notes.
    McShane BB; Böckenholt U; Hansen KT
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2016 Sep; 11(5):730-749. PubMed ID: 27694467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hybrid test for publication bias in meta-analysis.
    Lin L
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Oct; 29(10):2881-2899. PubMed ID: 32290810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparing meta-analyses and preregistered multiple-laboratory replication projects.
    Kvarven A; Strømland E; Johannesson M
    Nat Hum Behav; 2020 Apr; 4(4):423-434. PubMed ID: 31873200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Publication Bias and Nonreporting Found in Majority of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses in Anesthesiology Journals.
    Hedin RJ; Umberham BA; Detweiler BN; Kollmorgen L; Vassar M
    Anesth Analg; 2016 Oct; 123(4):1018-25. PubMed ID: 27537925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Publication bias in dermatology systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Atakpo P; Vassar M
    J Dermatol Sci; 2016 May; 82(2):69-74. PubMed ID: 26925817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Meta-regression approximations to reduce publication selection bias.
    Stanley TD; Doucouliagos H
    Res Synth Methods; 2014 Mar; 5(1):60-78. PubMed ID: 26054026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluating meta-analytic methods to detect selective reporting in the presence of dependent effect sizes.
    Rodgers MA; Pustejovsky JE
    Psychol Methods; 2020 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 32673040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A parsimonious weight function for modeling publication bias.
    Citkowicz M; Vevea JL
    Psychol Methods; 2017 Mar; 22(1):28-41. PubMed ID: 28252998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Empirical evaluation suggests Copas selection model preferable to trim-and-fill method for selection bias in meta-analysis.
    Schwarzer G; Carpenter J; Rücker G
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Mar; 63(3):282-8. PubMed ID: 19836925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. p-Curve and Effect Size: Correcting for Publication Bias Using Only Significant Results.
    Simonsohn U; Nelson LD; Simmons JP
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2014 Nov; 9(6):666-81. PubMed ID: 26186117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Industry sponsorship and publication bias among animal studies evaluating the effects of statins on atherosclerosis and bone outcomes: a meta-analysis.
    Anglemyer AT; Krauth D; Bero L
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2015 Mar; 15():12. PubMed ID: 25880564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.