BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28744892)

  • 1. Decision-theoretic designs for a series of trials with correlated treatment effects using the Sarmanov multivariate beta-binomial distribution.
    Hee SW; Parsons N; Stallard N
    Biom J; 2018 Mar; 60(2):232-245. PubMed ID: 28744892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bayesian decision-theoretic group sequential clinical trial design based on a quadratic loss function: a frequentist evaluation.
    Lewis RJ; Lipsky AM; Berry DA
    Clin Trials; 2007; 4(1):5-14. PubMed ID: 17327241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Designing a series of decision-theoretic phase II trials in a small population.
    Hee SW; Stallard N
    Stat Med; 2012 Dec; 31(30):4337-51. PubMed ID: 22927289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bayesian designs and the control of frequentist characteristics: a practical solution.
    Ventz S; Trippa L
    Biometrics; 2015 Mar; 71(1):218-226. PubMed ID: 25196832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Monitoring futility and efficacy in phase II trials with Bayesian posterior distributions-A calibration approach.
    Kopp-Schneider A; Wiesenfarth M; Witt R; Edelmann D; Witt O; Abel U
    Biom J; 2019 May; 61(3):488-502. PubMed ID: 30175405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Bayesian-frequentist two-stage single-arm phase II clinical trial design.
    Dong G; Shih WJ; Moore D; Quan H; Marcella S
    Stat Med; 2012 Aug; 31(19):2055-67. PubMed ID: 22415966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bayesian decision sequential analysis with survival endpoint in phase II clinical trials.
    Zhao L; Woodworth G
    Stat Med; 2009 Apr; 28(9):1339-52. PubMed ID: 19226557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Decision theoretic designs for phase II clinical trials with multiple outcomes.
    Stallard N; Thall PF; Whitehead J
    Biometrics; 1999 Sep; 55(3):971-7. PubMed ID: 11315037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bayesian randomized clinical trials: From fixed to adaptive design.
    Yin G; Lam CK; Shi H
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2017 Aug; 59():77-86. PubMed ID: 28455232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Confirmatory adaptive designs with Bayesian decision tools for a targeted therapy in oncology.
    Brannath W; Zuber E; Branson M; Bretz F; Gallo P; Posch M; Racine-Poon A
    Stat Med; 2009 May; 28(10):1445-63. PubMed ID: 19266565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Approaches for optimal sequential decision analysis in clinical trials.
    Carlin BP; Kadane JB; Gelfand AE
    Biometrics; 1998 Sep; 54(3):964-75. PubMed ID: 9750245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bayesian hypothesis testing in two-arm trials with dichotomous outcomes.
    Zaslavsky BG
    Biometrics; 2013 Mar; 69(1):157-63. PubMed ID: 23002906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Implementing a decision-theoretic design in clinical trials: why and how?
    Palmer CR; Shahumyan H
    Stat Med; 2007 Nov; 26(27):4939-57. PubMed ID: 17582801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bayesian design of single-arm phase II clinical trials with continuous monitoring.
    Johnson VE; Cook JD
    Clin Trials; 2009 Jun; 6(3):217-26. PubMed ID: 19528131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bayesian predictive power for interim adaptation in seamless phase II/III trials where the endpoint is survival up to some specified timepoint.
    Schmidli H; Bretz F; Racine-Poon A
    Stat Med; 2007 Nov; 26(27):4925-38. PubMed ID: 17590875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An adaptive approach to implementing bivariate group sequential clinical trial designs.
    Todd S
    J Biopharm Stat; 2003 Nov; 13(4):605-19. PubMed ID: 14584711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Bayesian decision-theoretic sequential response-adaptive randomization design.
    Jiang F; Jack Lee J; Müller P
    Stat Med; 2013 May; 32(12):1975-94. PubMed ID: 23315678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Performance of Fixed-Horizon, Look-Ahead Procedures Compared to Backward Induction in Bayesian Adaptive-Randomization Decision-Theoretic Clinical Trial Design.
    Lipsky AM; Lewis RJ
    Int J Biostat; 2019 Feb; 15(1):. PubMed ID: 30726189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Optimal choice of the number of treatments to be included in a clinical trial.
    Stallard N; Posch M; Friede T; Koenig F; Brannath W
    Stat Med; 2009 Apr; 28(9):1321-38. PubMed ID: 19243083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Screening designs for drug development.
    Rossell D; Müller P; Rosner GL
    Biostatistics; 2007 Jul; 8(3):595-608. PubMed ID: 17030589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.