231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28744900)
1. Mechanical and tactile incompatibilities cause reproductive isolation between two young damselfly species.
Barnard AA; Fincke OM; McPeek MA; Masly JP
Evolution; 2017 Oct; 71(10):2410-2427. PubMed ID: 28744900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Divergence in female damselfly sensory structures is consistent with a species recognition function but shows no evidence of reproductive character displacement.
Barnard AA; Masly JP
Ecol Evol; 2018 Dec; 8(23):12101-12114. PubMed ID: 30598803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Linking intra- and interspecific assortative mating: Consequences for asymmetric sexual isolation.
Svensson EI; Nordén A; Waller JT; Runemark A
Evolution; 2016 Jun; 70(6):1165-79. PubMed ID: 27151764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The role of prezygotic isolation mechanisms in the divergence of two parasite species.
Henrich T; Kalbe M
BMC Evol Biol; 2016 Nov; 16(1):245. PubMed ID: 27829374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sexual imprinting and speciation between two Peromyscus species.
Delaney EK; Hoekstra HE
Evolution; 2018 Feb; 72(2):274-287. PubMed ID: 29231989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Strong asymmetry in the relative strengths of prezygotic and postzygotic barriers between two damselfly sister species.
Sánchez-Guillén RA; Wellenreuther M; Cordero Rivera A
Evolution; 2012 Mar; 66(3):690-707. PubMed ID: 22380433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mating system variation and assortative mating of sympatric bromeliads (Pitcairnia spp.) endemic to neotropical inselbergs.
Palma-Silva C; Cozzolino S; Paggi GM; Lexer C; Wendt T
Am J Bot; 2015 May; 102(5):758-64. PubMed ID: 26022489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Multiple pre- and postzygotic components of reproductive isolation between two co-occurring Lysimachia species.
Jiménez-López FJ; Arista M; Talavera M; Cerdeira Morellato LP; Pannell JR; Viruel J; Ortiz Ballesteros PL
New Phytol; 2023 Apr; 238(2):874-887. PubMed ID: 36683441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Roles of Sexual and Viability Selection in the Evolution of Incomplete Reproductive Isolation: From Allopatry to Sympatry.
Cotto O; Servedio MR
Am Nat; 2017 Nov; 190(5):680-693. PubMed ID: 29053357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Genetic divergence predicts reproductive isolation in damselflies.
Sánchez-Guillén RA; Córdoba-Aguilar A; Cordero-Rivera A; Wellenreuther M
J Evol Biol; 2014 Jan; 27(1):76-87. PubMed ID: 24192316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Asymmetrical sexual isolation but no postmating isolation between the closely related species Drosophila suboccidentalis and Drosophila occidentalis.
Arthur NJ; Dyer KA
BMC Evol Biol; 2015 Mar; 15():38. PubMed ID: 25881167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Experimental hybridization and reproductive isolation between two sympatric species of tephritid fruit flies in the Anastrepha fraterculus species group.
Rull J; Tadeo E; Lasa R; Rodríguez CL; Altuzar-Molina A; Aluja M
Insect Sci; 2018 Dec; 25(6):1045-1055. PubMed ID: 28586142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Interspecific interactions and learning variability jointly drive geographic differences in mate preferences.
Verzijden MN; Svensson EI
Evolution; 2016 Aug; 70(8):1896-903. PubMed ID: 27302691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. On the Coyne and Orr-igin of species: effects of intrinsic postzygotic isolation, ecological differentiation, x chromosome size, and sympatry on Drosophila speciation.
Turelli M; Lipkowitz JR; Brandvain Y
Evolution; 2014 Apr; 68(4):1176-87. PubMed ID: 24325145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Strength of sexual and postmating prezygotic barriers varies between sympatric populations with different histories and species abundances.
Poikela N; Kinnunen J; Wurdack M; Kauranen H; Schmitt T; Kankare M; Snook RR; Hoikkala A
Evolution; 2019 Jun; 73(6):1182-1199. PubMed ID: 30957216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The evolution of strong reproductive isolation between sympatric intertidal snails.
Stankowski S; Westram AM; Zagrodzka ZB; Eyres I; Broquet T; Johannesson K; Butlin RK
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2020 Aug; 375(1806):20190545. PubMed ID: 32654639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Female mate preferences on high-dimensional shape variation for male species recognition traits.
Siepielski AM; McPeek SJ; McPeek MA
J Evol Biol; 2018 Aug; 31(8):1239-1250. PubMed ID: 29876989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The importance of intrinsic postzygotic barriers throughout the speciation process.
Coughlan JM; Matute DR
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2020 Aug; 375(1806):20190533. PubMed ID: 32654642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The rate test of speciation: estimating the likelihood of non-allopatric speciation from reproductive isolation rates in Drosophila.
Yukilevich R
Evolution; 2014 Apr; 68(4):1150-62. PubMed ID: 24274675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Strong cryptic prezygotic isolation despite lack of behavioral isolation between sympatric host races of the leaf beetle Lochmaea capreae.
Soudi S; Reinhold K; Engqvist L
Evolution; 2016 Dec; 70(12):2889-2898. PubMed ID: 27749980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
