These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28744902)

  • 1. Abstraction and the (Misnamed) Language Familiarity Effect.
    Johnson EK; Bruggeman L; Cutler A
    Cogn Sci; 2018 Mar; 42(2):633-645. PubMed ID: 28744902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hierarchical contributions of linguistic knowledge to talker identification: Phonological versus lexical familiarity.
    McLaughlin DE; Carter YD; Cheng CC; Perrachione TK
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 May; 81(4):1088-1107. PubMed ID: 31218598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Listening Effort by Native and Nonnative Listeners Due to Noise, Reverberation, and Talker Foreign Accent During English Speech Perception.
    Peng ZE; Wang LM
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Apr; 62(4):1068-1081. PubMed ID: 30986135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Talker-familiarity benefit in non-native recognition memory and word identification: The role of listening conditions and proficiency.
    Drozdova P; van Hout R; Scharenborg O
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jul; 81(5):1675-1697. PubMed ID: 30834484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Working-memory disruption by task-irrelevant talkers depends on degree of talker familiarity.
    Kreitewolf J; Wöstmann M; Tune S; Plöchl M; Obleser J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 May; 81(4):1108-1118. PubMed ID: 30993655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Gradient language dominance affects talker learning.
    Bregman MR; Creel SC
    Cognition; 2014 Jan; 130(1):85-95. PubMed ID: 24211437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of noise, reverberation and foreign accent on native and non-native listeners' performance of English speech comprehension.
    Peng ZE; Wang LM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 May; 139(5):2772. PubMed ID: 27250170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Recognition of spoken words by native and non-native listeners: talker-, listener-, and item-related factors.
    Bradlow AR; Pisoni DB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Oct; 106(4 Pt 1):2074-85. PubMed ID: 10530030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of cross-language voice training on speech perception: whose familiar voices are more intelligible?
    Levi SV; Winters SJ; Pisoni DB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Dec; 130(6):4053-62. PubMed ID: 22225059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of language experience and task demands on talker recognition by children and adults.
    Fecher N; Johnson EK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Apr; 143(4):2409. PubMed ID: 29716261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Lexical and talker effects on word recognition among native and non-native listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Takayanagi S; Dirks DD; Moshfegh A
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2002 Jun; 45(3):585-97. PubMed ID: 12069010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Other Accent Effect in Talker Recognition: Now You See It, Now You Don't.
    Yu ME; Schertz J; Johnson EK
    Cogn Sci; 2021 Jun; 45(6):e12986. PubMed ID: 34170043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cross-language perception of Cantonese vowels spoken by native and non-native speakers.
    So CK; Attina V
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2014 Oct; 43(5):611-30. PubMed ID: 24057944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rapid adaptation to foreign-accented speech and its transfer to an unfamiliar talker.
    Xie X; Weatherholtz K; Bainton L; Rowe E; Burchill Z; Liu L; Jaeger TF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Apr; 143(4):2013. PubMed ID: 29716296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Familiarity, expertise, and change detection: change deafness is worse in your native language.
    Neuhoff JG; Schott SA; Kropf AJ; Neuhoff EM
    Perception; 2014; 43(2-3):219-22. PubMed ID: 24919355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Talker- and language-specific effects on speech intelligibility in noise assessed with bilingual talkers: Which language is more robust against noise and reverberation?
    Hochmuth S; Jürgens T; Brand T; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():23-34. PubMed ID: 26486466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Differential neural contributions to native- and foreign-language talker identification.
    Perrachione TK; Pierrehumbert JB; Wong PC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Dec; 35(6):1950-60. PubMed ID: 19968445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A language-familiarity effect for speaker discrimination without comprehension.
    Fleming D; Giordano BL; Caldara R; Belin P
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2014 Sep; 111(38):13795-8. PubMed ID: 25201950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Neural basis of language familiarity effects on voice recognition: An fNIRS study.
    Meng Y; Liang C; Chen W; Liu Z; Yang C; Hu J; Gao Z; Gao S
    Cortex; 2024 Jul; 176():1-10. PubMed ID: 38723449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Phonological versus phonetic cues in native and non-native listening: Korean and Dutch listeners' perception of Dutch and English consonants.
    Cho T; McQueen JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 May; 119(5 Pt 1):3085-96. PubMed ID: 16708963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.