These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

552 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28745035)

  • 1. Evaluation of complication rates and vertical bone gain after guided bone regeneration with non-resorbable membranes versus titanium meshes and resorbable membranes. A randomized clinical trial.
    Cucchi A; Vignudelli E; Napolitano A; Marchetti C; Corinaldesi G
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2017 Oct; 19(5):821-832. PubMed ID: 28745035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Expanded vs. dense polytetrafluoroethylene membranes in vertical ridge augmentation around dental implants: a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Ronda M; Rebaudi A; Torelli L; Stacchi C
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jul; 25(7):859-66. PubMed ID: 23560678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Proposal of Pseudo-periosteum Classification After GBR by Means of Titanium-Reinforced d-PTFE Membranes or Titanium Meshes Plus Cross-Linked Collagen Membranes.
    Cucchi A; Sartori M; Aldini NN; Vignudelli E; Corinaldesi G
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2019; 39(4):e157-e165. PubMed ID: 31226196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Vertical-guided bone regeneration with a titanium-reinforced d-PTFE membrane utilizing a novel split-thickness flap design: a prospective case series.
    Windisch P; Orban K; Salvi GE; Sculean A; Molnar B
    Clin Oral Investig; 2021 May; 25(5):2969-2980. PubMed ID: 33040203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dense Polytetrafluoroethylene Membrane versus Titanium Mesh in Vertical Ridge Augmentation: Clinical and Histological Results of a Split-mouth Prospective Study.
    Maiorana C; Fontana F; Dal Polo MR; Pieroni S; Ferrantino L; Poli PP; Simion M
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 May; 22(5):465-472. PubMed ID: 34318762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Vertical ridge augmentation (VRA) with Ti-reinforced d-PTFE membranes or Ti meshes and collagen membranes: 1-year results of a randomized clinical trial.
    Cucchi A; Vignudelli E; Fiorino A; Pellegrino G; Corinaldesi G
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2021 Jan; 32(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 33017060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Vertical ridge augmentation with Ti-reinforced dense polytetrafluoroethylene (d-PTFE) membranes or Ti-meshes and collagen membranes: 3-year results of a randomized clinical trial.
    Cucchi A; Bettini S; Ghensi P; Fiorino A; Corinaldesi G
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2023 Apr; 25(2):352-369. PubMed ID: 36646986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Vertical and horizontal ridge augmentation using customized CAD/CAM titanium mesh with versus without resorbable membranes. A randomized clinical trial.
    Cucchi A; Vignudelli E; Franceschi D; Randellini E; Lizio G; Fiorino A; Corinaldesi G
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2021 Dec; 32(12):1411-1424. PubMed ID: 34551168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Histological and histomorphometric analysis of bone tissue after guided bone regeneration with non-resorbable membranes vs resorbable membranes and titanium mesh.
    Cucchi A; Sartori M; Parrilli A; Aldini NN; Vignudelli E; Corinaldesi G
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2019 Aug; 21(4):693-701. PubMed ID: 31286649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical and histologic evaluation of allogeneic bone matrix versus autogenous bone chips associated with titanium-reinforced e-PTFE membrane for vertical ridge augmentation: a prospective pilot study.
    Fontana F; Santoro F; Maiorana C; Iezzi G; Piattelli A; Simion M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(6):1003-12. PubMed ID: 19216268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Vertical ridge augmentation with autogenous bone grafts: resorbable barriers supported by ostheosynthesis plates versus titanium-reinforced barriers. A preliminary report of a blinded, randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Merli M; Migani M; Esposito M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(3):373-82. PubMed ID: 17622003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A microcomputed tomography analysis of bone tissue after vertical ridge augmentation with non-resorbable membranes versus resorbable membranes and titanium mesh in humans.
    Cucchi A; Vignudelli E; Sartori M; Parrilli A; Aldini NN; Corinaldesi G
    Int J Oral Implantol (Berl); 2021 Mar; 14(1):25-38. PubMed ID: 34006069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A novel technique for digitalisation and customisation of reinforced polytetrafluoroethylene meshes: Preliminary results of a clinical trial.
    Cucchi A; Bettini S; Corinaldesi G
    Int J Oral Implantol (Berl); 2022 May; 15(2):129-146. PubMed ID: 35546723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bone level variation after vertical ridge augmentation: resorbable barriers versus titanium-reinforced barriers. A 6-year double-blind randomized clinical trial.
    Merli M; Moscatelli M; Mariotti G; Rotundo R; Bernardelli F; Nieri M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(4):905-13. PubMed ID: 25032771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Vertical ridge augmentation using guided bone regeneration (GBR) in three clinical scenarios prior to implant placement: a retrospective study of 35 patients 12 to 72 months after loading.
    Urban IA; Jovanovic SA; Lozada JL
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):502-10. PubMed ID: 19587874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A novel combined surgical approach to vertical alveolar ridge augmentation with titanium mesh, resorbable membrane, and rhPDGF-BB: a retrospective consecutive case series.
    Funato A; Ishikawa T; Kitajima H; Yamada M; Moroi H
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2013; 33(4):437-45. PubMed ID: 23820701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Limitations and options using resorbable versus nonresorbable membranes for successful guided bone regeneration.
    Soldatos NK; Stylianou P; Koidou VP; Angelov N; Yukna R; Romanos GE
    Quintessence Int; 2017; 48(2):131-147. PubMed ID: 27834419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Guided bone regeneration around endosseous implants with anorganic bovine bone mineral. A randomized controlled trial comparing bioabsorbable versus non-resorbable barriers.
    Carpio L; Loza J; Lynch S; Genco R
    J Periodontol; 2000 Nov; 71(11):1743-9. PubMed ID: 11128923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Vertical ridge augmentation with autogenous bone grafts 3 years after loading: resorbable barriers versus titanium-reinforced barriers. A randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Merli M; Lombardini F; Esposito M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(4):801-7. PubMed ID: 20657877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Simultaneous implant placement and vertical ridge augmentation with a titanium-reinforced membrane: a case report.
    Cornelini R; Cangini F; Covani U; Andreana S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(6):883-8. PubMed ID: 11151590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 28.