These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
375 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28746234)
1. Outcome of high-intensity focused ultrasound and uterine artery embolization in the treatment and management of cesarean scar pregnancy: A retrospective study. Hong Y; Guo Q; Pu Y; Lu D; Hu M Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Jul; 96(30):e7687. PubMed ID: 28746234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of high-intensity focused ultrasound and uterine artery embolisation for the management of caesarean scar pregnancy. Zhu X; Deng X; Xiao S; Wan Y; Xue M Int J Hyperthermia; 2016; 32(2):144-50. PubMed ID: 26644262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical outcome of high-intensity focused ultrasound as the preoperative management of cesarean scar pregnancy. Liu CN; Tang L; Sun Y; Liu YH; Yu HJ Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 May; 59(3):387-391. PubMed ID: 32416885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Combined laparoscopy and hysteroscopy vs. uterine curettage in the uterine artery embolization-based management of cesarean scar pregnancy: a retrospective cohort study. He Y; Wu X; Zhu Q; Wu X; Feng L; Wu X; Zhao A; Di W BMC Womens Health; 2014 Sep; 14():116. PubMed ID: 25248928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Efficacy and Safety of High-intensity Focused Ultrasound Compared with Uterine Artery Embolization in Cesarean Section Pregnancy: A Meta-analysis. Liu Y; Wang L; Zhu X J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2023 Jun; 30(6):446-454. PubMed ID: 36893898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Analysis of the Reproductive Outcome of Patients with Cesarean Scar Pregnancy Treated by High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound and Uterine Artery Embolization: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Chen L; Xiao S; Zhu X; He S; Xue M J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(5):883-890. PubMed ID: 30205163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical efficacy and re-pregnancy outcomes of patients with previous cesarean scar pregnancy treated with either high-intensity focused ultrasound or uterine artery embolization before ultrasound-guided dilatation and curettage: a retrospective cohort study. Wang X; Yang B; Chen W; Chen J BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2023 Feb; 23(1):85. PubMed ID: 36726079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Interventions for non-tubal ectopic pregnancy. Long Y; Zhu H; Hu Y; Shen L; Fu J; Huang W Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2020 Jul; 7(7):CD011174. PubMed ID: 32609376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. High-intensity focused ultrasound combined with suction curettage for the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy. Zhu X; Deng X; Wan Y; Xiao S; Huang J; Zhang L; Xue M Medicine (Baltimore); 2015 May; 94(18):e854. PubMed ID: 25950698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound and Uterine Artery Embolization in Caesarean Scar Pregnancy: A Meta-analysis. Xiao X; Feng Z; Li T; Yi B; Zhang S; Wang W Adv Ther; 2019 Jun; 36(6):1314-1325. PubMed ID: 31049875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cesarean Scar Pregnancy: Comparing the Efficacy and Tolerability of Treatment with High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound and Uterine Artery Embolization. Xiao J; Shi Z; Zhou J; Ye J; Zhu J; Zhou X; Wang F; Zhang S Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 Mar; 43(3):640-647. PubMed ID: 27979666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Clinical application and prognostic analysis of interventional treatment for cesarean scar pregnancy]. Lu JY; Gu JP; Xu WJ; Lou WS; Shi WY; Wang T; Shao ZF Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2016 Dec; 48(6):1012-1018. PubMed ID: 27987506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of the necessity of uterine artery embolization during suction and curettage for caesarean scar pregnancy: a prospective cohort study. Ou J; Peng P; Li C; Teng L; Liu X BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 Jun; 20(1):378. PubMed ID: 32600442 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. High-intensity focused ultrasound compared with uterine artery chemoembolization with methotrexate for the management of cesarean scar pregnancy. Wang W; Chen Y; Yang Y; Qu D; Jiang J Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2022 Sep; 158(3):572-578. PubMed ID: 34797925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Management of cesarean scar pregnancy by hysteroscopy combined with uterine artery embolism]. Chen ZY; Zhang XM; Xu H; Zhang J; Huang XF Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Aug; 46(8):591-4. PubMed ID: 22169517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A retrospective comparative study evaluating the efficacy of adding intra-arterial methotrexate infusion to uterine artery embolisation followed by curettage for cesarean scar pregnancy. Gao L; Hou YY; Sun F; Xia W; Yang Y; Tian T; Chen QF; Li XC Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2018 May; 297(5):1205-1211. PubMed ID: 29497822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. High intensity focused ultrasound combined with ultrasound-guided suction curettage treatment for cesarean scar pregnancy: a comparison of different HIFU sonication strategies. Yin Y; Pan F; He M; Zhang C; Liu Y Int J Hyperthermia; 2022; 39(1):390-396. PubMed ID: 35196957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Cesarean scar pregnancy analysis of 42 cases]. Yin L; Tao X; Zhu YC; Yu XL; Zou YH; Yang HX Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Aug; 44(8):566-9. PubMed ID: 20003781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Clinical analysis on selective uterine artery embolization combined with hysteroscopic surgery for exogenous cesarean scar pregnancy in 67 cases]. Wang G; Liu X; Wang D; Yang Q Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Aug; 50(8):576-81. PubMed ID: 26675179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical efficacy and safety between high-intensity focused ultrasound and uterine artery embolization for cesarean scar pregnancy: a systematic review and a meta-analysis. Mi W; Pei P; Zheng Y Ann Palliat Med; 2021 Jun; 10(6):6379-6387. PubMed ID: 34237960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]