These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

291 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28746377)

  • 1. Evaluating the impact of a mandatory pre-abortion ultrasound viewing law: A mixed methods study.
    Upadhyay UD; Kimport K; Belusa EKO; Johns NE; Laube DW; Roberts SCM
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0178871. PubMed ID: 28746377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Beyond political claims: women's interest in and emotional response to viewing their ultrasound image in abortion care.
    Kimport K; Weitz TA; Foster DG
    Perspect Sex Reprod Health; 2014 Dec; 46(4):185-91. PubMed ID: 25209369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Coercing Women's Behavior: How a Mandatory Viewing Law Changes Patients' Preabortion Ultrasound Viewing Practices.
    Kimport K; Johns NE; Upadhyay UD
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 2018 Dec; 43(6):941-960. PubMed ID: 31091323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Women's perspectives on ultrasound viewing in the abortion care context.
    Kimport K; Preskill F; Cockrill K; Weitz TA
    Womens Health Issues; 2012; 22(6):e513-7. PubMed ID: 23040800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of Outcomes before and after Ohio's Law Mandating Use of the FDA-Approved Protocol for Medication Abortion: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
    Upadhyay UD; Johns NE; Combellick SL; Kohn JE; Keder LM; Roberts SC
    PLoS Med; 2016 Aug; 13(8):e1002110. PubMed ID: 27575488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Women's experiences of their preabortion ultrasound image printout.
    Kimport K; Johns NE; Upadhyay UD
    Contraception; 2018 Apr; 97(4):319-323. PubMed ID: 29242086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relationship between ultrasound viewing and proceeding to abortion.
    Gatter M; Kimport K; Foster DG; Weitz TA; Upadhyay UD
    Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jan; 123(1):81-87. PubMed ID: 24463667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Patient viewing of the ultrasound image prior to abortion.
    Kimport K; Upadhyay UD; Foster DG; Gatter M; Weitz TA
    Contraception; 2013 Nov; 88(5):666-70. PubMed ID: 24028750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Do 72-Hour Waiting Periods and Two-Visit Requirements for Abortion Affect Women's Certainty? A Prospective Cohort Study.
    Roberts SCM; Belusa E; Turok DK; Combellick S; Ralph L
    Womens Health Issues; 2017; 27(4):400-406. PubMed ID: 28391971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A qualitative study of women's decision to view or not view an ultrasound image before early medication abortion.
    Cappiello J; Merrell J; Rentschler D
    Womens Health Issues; 2014; 24(4):e413-8. PubMed ID: 24981400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Knowledge on legislation of abortion and experience of abortion among female youth in Nepal: A cross sectional study.
    Adhikari R
    Reprod Health; 2016 Apr; 13():48. PubMed ID: 27117480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The experiences and adaptations of abortion providers practicing under a new TRAP law: a qualitative study.
    Mercier RJ; Buchbinder M; Bryant A; Britton L
    Contraception; 2015 Jun; 91(6):507-12. PubMed ID: 25746295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Longest Wait: Examining the Impact of Utah's 72-Hour Waiting Period for Abortion.
    Sanders JN; Conway H; Jacobson J; Torres L; Turok DK
    Womens Health Issues; 2016; 26(5):483-7. PubMed ID: 27502901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What it does and does not do: Effects of ultrasound viewing on women's intention to terminate a pregnancy.
    Sebola BR
    Afr J Reprod Health; 2023 Mar; 27(3):71-76. PubMed ID: 37584974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Measuring decisional certainty among women seeking abortion.
    Ralph LJ; Foster DG; Kimport K; Turok D; Roberts SCM
    Contraception; 2017 Mar; 95(3):269-278. PubMed ID: 27745910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Change in Second-Trimester Abortion After Implementation of a Restrictive State Law.
    White K; Baum SE; Hopkins K; Potter JE; Grossman D
    Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Apr; 133(4):771-779. PubMed ID: 30870293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Social sources of women's emotional difficulty after abortion: lessons from women's abortion narratives.
    Kimport K; Foster K; Weitz TA
    Perspect Sex Reprod Health; 2011 Jun; 43(2):103-9. PubMed ID: 21651709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The difficult process of autonomous choice: using I-poems to understand experiences of abortion-seekers in The Netherlands.
    Holten L; van der Wolf R; van der Pijl MSG
    Sex Reprod Health Matters; 2023 Dec; 31(1):2215963. PubMed ID: 37378954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. "I need to terminate this pregnancy even if it will take my life": a qualitative study of the effect of being denied legal abortion on women's lives in Nepal.
    Puri M; Vohra D; Gerdts C; Foster DG
    BMC Womens Health; 2015 Oct; 15():85. PubMed ID: 26466784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Viewing ultrasound scan images prior to termination of pregnancy: choice for women or conflict for ultrasonographers?
    Graham O; Ankrett S; Killick SR
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2010; 30(5):484-8. PubMed ID: 20604652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.