These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

434 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28747171)

  • 1. Incorporation of causative quantitative trait nucleotides in single-step GBLUP.
    Fragomeni BO; Lourenco DAL; Masuda Y; Legarra A; Misztal I
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Jul; 49(1):59. PubMed ID: 28747171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Weighted single-step genomic BLUP improves accuracy of genomic breeding values for protein content in French dairy goats: a quantitative trait influenced by a major gene.
    Teissier M; Larroque H; Robert-Granié C
    Genet Sel Evol; 2018 Jun; 50(1):31. PubMed ID: 29907084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Dimensionality of Genomic Information and Its Effect on Genomic Prediction.
    Pocrnic I; Lourenco DA; Masuda Y; Legarra A; Misztal I
    Genetics; 2016 May; 203(1):573-81. PubMed ID: 26944916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prediction accuracy for a simulated maternally affected trait of beef cattle using different genomic evaluation models.
    Lourenco DA; Misztal I; Wang H; Aguilar I; Tsuruta S; Bertrand JK
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Sep; 91(9):4090-8. PubMed ID: 23893997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of genomic selection for a sib-evaluated trait using identity-by-state and identity-by-descent relationships.
    Vela-Avitúa S; Meuwissen TH; Luan T; Ødegård J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Feb; 47(1):9. PubMed ID: 25888184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Efficient approximation of reliabilities for single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor models with the Algorithm for Proven and Young.
    Bermann M; Lourenco D; Misztal I
    J Anim Sci; 2022 Jan; 100(1):. PubMed ID: 34877603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Alternative SNP weighting for single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor evaluation of stature in US Holsteins in the presence of selected sequence variants.
    Fragomeni BO; Lourenco DAL; Legarra A; VanRaden PM; Misztal I
    J Dairy Sci; 2019 Nov; 102(11):10012-10019. PubMed ID: 31495612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improving the accuracy of genomic evaluation for linear body measurement traits using single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction in Hanwoo beef cattle.
    Naserkheil M; Lee DH; Mehrban H
    BMC Genet; 2020 Dec; 21(1):144. PubMed ID: 33267771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improving accuracy of direct and maternal genetic effects in genomic evaluations using pooled boar semen: a simulation study1.
    Maiorano AM; Assen A; Bijma P; Chen CY; Silva JAIV; Herring WO; Tsuruta S; Misztal I; Lourenco DAL
    J Anim Sci; 2019 Jul; 97(8):3237-3245. PubMed ID: 31240314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Performances of Adaptive MultiBLUP, Bayesian regressions, and weighted-GBLUP approaches for genomic predictions in Belgian Blue beef cattle.
    Gualdrón Duarte JL; Gori AS; Hubin X; Lourenco D; Charlier C; Misztal I; Druet T
    BMC Genomics; 2020 Aug; 21(1):545. PubMed ID: 32762654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Alternative SNP weighting for multi-step and single-step genomic BLUP in the presence of causative variants.
    Santana BF; Riser M; Hay EHA; Fragomeni BO
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2023 Nov; 140(6):679-694. PubMed ID: 37551047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dimensionality of genomic information and its impact on genome-wide associations and variant selection for genomic prediction: a simulation study.
    Jang S; Tsuruta S; Leite NG; Misztal I; Lourenco D
    Genet Sel Evol; 2023 Jul; 55(1):49. PubMed ID: 37460964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Indirect predictions with a large number of genotyped animals using the algorithm for proven and young.
    Garcia ALS; Masuda Y; Tsuruta S; Miller S; Misztal I; Lourenco D
    J Anim Sci; 2020 Jun; 98(6):. PubMed ID: 32374831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Genome-wide association mapping including phenotypes from relatives without genotypes.
    Wang H; Misztal I; Aguilar I; Legarra A; Muir WM
    Genet Res (Camb); 2012 Apr; 94(2):73-83. PubMed ID: 22624567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Single nucleotide polymorphism profile for quantitative trait nucleotide in populations with small effective size and its impact on mapping and genomic predictions.
    Pocrnic I; Lourenco D; Misztal I
    Genetics; 2024 Aug; 227(4):. PubMed ID: 38913695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genetic evaluation using single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor in American Angus.
    Lourenco DA; Tsuruta S; Fragomeni BO; Masuda Y; Aguilar I; Legarra A; Bertrand JK; Amen TS; Wang L; Moser DW; Misztal I
    J Anim Sci; 2015 Jun; 93(6):2653-62. PubMed ID: 26115253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An efficient exact method to obtain GBLUP and single-step GBLUP when the genomic relationship matrix is singular.
    Fernando RL; Cheng H; Garrick DJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Oct; 48(1):80. PubMed ID: 27788669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Empirical comparison between different methods for genomic prediction of number of piglets born alive in moderate sized breeding populations.
    Fangmann A; Sharifi RA; Heinkel J; Danowski K; Schrade H; Erbe M; Simianer H
    J Anim Sci; 2017 Apr; 95(4):1434-1443. PubMed ID: 28464085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Development of genomic predictions for harvest and carcass weight in channel catfish.
    Garcia ALS; Bosworth B; Waldbieser G; Misztal I; Tsuruta S; Lourenco DAL
    Genet Sel Evol; 2018 Dec; 50(1):66. PubMed ID: 30547740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of genomic predictions using genomic relationship matrices built with different weighting factors to account for locus-specific variances.
    Su G; Christensen OF; Janss L; Lund MS
    J Dairy Sci; 2014 Oct; 97(10):6547-59. PubMed ID: 25129495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.