These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. Humans (Homo sapiens) judge the emotional content of piglet (Sus scrofa domestica) calls based on simple acoustic parameters, not personality, empathy, nor attitude toward animals. Maruščáková IL; Linhart P; Ratcliffe VF; Tallet C; Reby D; Špinka M J Comp Psychol; 2015 May; 129(2):121-31. PubMed ID: 25798794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Expression of Emotional Arousal in Two Different Piglet Call Types. Linhart P; Ratcliffe VF; Reby D; Špinka M PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0135414. PubMed ID: 26274816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pitch affects human (Homo sapiens) perception of emotional arousal from diverse animal calls. Schwartz JW; Pierson KH; Reece AK J Comp Psychol; 2024 May; 138(2):80-87. PubMed ID: 37870804 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Age, empathy, familiarity, domestication and call features enhance human perception of animal emotion expressions. Greenall JS; Cornu L; Maigrot AL; de la Torre MP; Briefer EF R Soc Open Sci; 2022 Dec; 9(12):221138. PubMed ID: 36483756 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Vocal expression of emotional arousal across two call types in young rhesus macaques. Schwartz JW; Sanchez MM; Gouzoules H Anim Behav; 2022 Aug; 190():125-138. PubMed ID: 36337435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Humans identify negative (but not positive) arousal in silver fox vocalizations: implications for the adaptive value of interspecific eavesdropping. Filippi P; Gogoleva SS; Volodina EV; Volodin IA; de Boer B Curr Zool; 2017 Aug; 63(4):445-456. PubMed ID: 29492004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Human listeners' perception of behavioural context and core affect dimensions in chimpanzee vocalizations. Kamiloğlu RG; Slocombe KE; Haun DBM; Sauter DA Proc Biol Sci; 2020 Jun; 287(1929):20201148. PubMed ID: 32546102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Segregation of information about emotional arousal and valence in horse whinnies. Briefer EF; Maigrot AL; Mandel R; Freymond SB; Bachmann I; Hillmann E Sci Rep; 2015 Apr; 4():9989. PubMed ID: 25897781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Perceptual and acoustic differences between authentic and acted nonverbal emotional vocalizations. Anikin A; Lima CF Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Mar; 71(3):622-641. PubMed ID: 27937389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Meaning and emotion in animal vocalizations. Seyfarth RM; Cheney DL Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2003 Dec; 1000():32-55. PubMed ID: 14766619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ultrasonic vocalizations of adult male Foxp2-mutant mice: behavioral contexts of arousal and emotion. Gaub S; Fisher SE; Ehret G Genes Brain Behav; 2016 Feb; 15(2):243-59. PubMed ID: 26566793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Second Language Ability and Emotional Prosody Perception. Bhatara A; Laukka P; Boll-Avetisyan N; Granjon L; Anger Elfenbein H; Bänziger T PLoS One; 2016; 11(6):e0156855. PubMed ID: 27253326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Humans rely on the same rules to assess emotional valence and intensity in conspecific and dog vocalizations. Faragó T; Andics A; Devecseri V; Kis A; Gácsi M; Miklósi A Biol Lett; 2014 Jan; 10(1):20130926. PubMed ID: 24402716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Acoustic allometry and vocal learning in mammals. Garcia M; Ravignani A Biol Lett; 2020 Jul; 16(7):20200081. PubMed ID: 32634374 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]