429 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28748346)
1. Trends in incidence and tumour grade in screen-detected ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive breast cancer.
Luiten JD; Voogd AC; Luiten EJT; Duijm LEM
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Nov; 166(1):307-314. PubMed ID: 28748346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Screening outcome and surgical treatment during and after the transition from screen-film to digital screening mammography in the south of The Netherlands.
Weber RJ; Nederend J; Voogd AC; Strobbe LJ; Duijm LE
Int J Cancer; 2015 Jul; 137(1):135-43. PubMed ID: 25418512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Recall and Outcome of Screen-detected Microcalcifications during 2 Decades of Mammography Screening in the Netherlands National Breast Screening Program.
Luiten JD; Voogd AC; Luiten EJT; Broeders MJM; Roes KCB; Tjan-Heijnen VCG; Duijm LEM
Radiology; 2020 Mar; 294(3):528-537. PubMed ID: 31990268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Nation-wide data on screening performance during the transition to digital mammography: observations in 6 million screens.
van Luijt PA; Fracheboud J; Heijnsdijk EA; den Heeten GJ; de Koning HJ;
Eur J Cancer; 2013 Nov; 49(16):3517-25. PubMed ID: 23871248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Digital vs screen-film mammography in population-based breast cancer screening: performance indicators and tumour characteristics of screen-detected and interval cancers.
de Munck L; de Bock GH; Otter R; Reiding D; Broeders MJ; Willemse PH; Siesling S
Br J Cancer; 2016 Aug; 115(5):517-24. PubMed ID: 27490807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Trends in detection of invasive cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ at biennial screening mammography in Spain: a retrospective cohort study.
Román M; Rué M; Sala M; Ascunce N; Baré M; Baroja A; De la Vega M; Galcerán J; Natal C; Salas D; Sánchez-Jacob M; Zubizarreta R; Castells X;
PLoS One; 2013; 8(12):e83121. PubMed ID: 24376649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The method of detection of ductal carcinoma in situ has no therapeutic implications: results of a population-based cohort study.
Elshof LE; Schaapveld M; Rutgers EJ; Schmidt MK; de Munck L; van Leeuwen FE; Wesseling J
Breast Cancer Res; 2017 Mar; 19(1):26. PubMed ID: 28274272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of the transition from screen-film to digital screening mammography on interval cancer characteristics and treatment - a population based study from the Netherlands.
Nederend J; Duijm LE; Louwman MW; Coebergh JW; Roumen RM; Lohle PN; Roukema JA; Rutten MJ; van Steenbergen LN; Ernst MF; Jansen FH; Plaisier ML; Hooijen MJ; Voogd AC
Eur J Cancer; 2014 Jan; 50(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 24275518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The distribution of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) grade in 4232 women and its impact on overdiagnosis in breast cancer screening.
van Luijt PA; Heijnsdijk EA; Fracheboud J; Overbeek LI; Broeders MJ; Wesseling J; den Heeten GJ; de Koning HJ
Breast Cancer Res; 2016 May; 18(1):47. PubMed ID: 27160733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Interval breast cancer characteristics before, during and after the transition from screen-film to full-field digital screening mammography.
van Bommel RMG; Weber R; Voogd AC; Nederend J; Louwman MWJ; Venderink D; Strobbe LJA; Rutten MJC; Plaisier ML; Lohle PN; Hooijen MJH; Tjan-Heijnen VCG; Duijm LEM
BMC Cancer; 2017 May; 17(1):315. PubMed ID: 28476109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Screen detection of ductal carcinoma in situ and subsequent incidence of invasive interval breast cancers: a retrospective population-based study.
Duffy SW; Dibden A; Michalopoulos D; Offman J; Parmar D; Jenkins J; Collins B; Robson T; Scorfield S; Green K; Hall C; Liao XH; Ryan M; Johnson F; Stevens G; Kearins O; Sellars S; Patnick J
Lancet Oncol; 2016 Jan; 17(1):109-14. PubMed ID: 26655422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Digital mammography screening: association between detection rate and nuclear grade of ductal carcinoma in situ.
Weigel S; Heindel W; Heidinger O; Berkemeyer S; Hense HW
Radiology; 2014 Apr; 271(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 24475843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of transition from analog screening mammography to digital screening mammography on screening outcome in The Netherlands: a population-based study.
Nederend J; Duijm LEM; Louwman MWJ; Groenewoud JH; Donkers-van Rossum AB; Voogd AC
Ann Oncol; 2012 Dec; 23(12):3098-3103. PubMed ID: 22745215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The frequency of presentation and clinico-pathological characteristics of symptomatic versus screen detected ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.
Barnes NL; Dimopoulos N; Williams KE; Howe M; Bundred NJ
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2014 Mar; 40(3):249-54. PubMed ID: 24433818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Trends in incidence and detection of advanced breast cancer at biennial screening mammography in The Netherlands: a population based study.
Nederend J; Duijm LE; Voogd AC; Groenewoud JH; Jansen FH; Louwman MW
Breast Cancer Res; 2012 Jan; 14(1):R10. PubMed ID: 22230363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of full-field digital mammography on pre-operative diagnosis and surgical treatment of mammographic microcalcification.
Bundred SM; Zhou J; Whiteside S; Morris J; Wilson M; Hurley E; Bundred N
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2014 Jan; 143(2):359-66. PubMed ID: 24318468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of digital screening mammography and screen-film mammography in the early detection of clinically relevant cancers: a multicenter study.
Bluekens AM; Holland R; Karssemeijer N; Broeders MJ; den Heeten GJ
Radiology; 2012 Dec; 265(3):707-14. PubMed ID: 23033499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Full-field digital mammography compared to screen film mammography in the prevalent round of a population-based screening programme: the Vestfold County Study.
Vigeland E; Klaasen H; Klingen TA; Hofvind S; Skaane P
Eur Radiol; 2008 Jan; 18(1):183-91. PubMed ID: 17680246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Screening outcome in women repeatedly recalled for the same mammographic abnormality before, during and after the transition from screen-film to full-field digital screening mammography.
van Bommel R; Voogd AC; Louwman MW; Strobbe LJ; Venderink D; Duijm LE
Eur Radiol; 2017 Feb; 27(2):553-561. PubMed ID: 27180183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Breast cancer screening with tomosynthesis (3D mammography) with acquired or synthetic 2D mammography compared with 2D mammography alone (STORM-2): a population-based prospective study.
Bernardi D; Macaskill P; Pellegrini M; Valentini M; Fantò C; Ostillio L; Tuttobene P; Luparia A; Houssami N
Lancet Oncol; 2016 Aug; 17(8):1105-1113. PubMed ID: 27345635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
