These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

268 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28749070)

  • 1. Diagnostic accuracy of a five-point Likert scoring system for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluated according to results of MRI/ultrasonography image-fusion targeted biopsy of the prostate.
    Shin T; Smyth TB; Ukimura O; Ahmadi N; de Castro Abreu AL; Ohe C; Oishi M; Mimata H; Gill IS
    BJU Int; 2018 Jan; 121(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 28749070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Detection of prostate cancer using magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasonography image-fusion targeted biopsy in African-American men.
    Shin T; Smyth TB; Ukimura O; Ahmadi N; de Castro Abreu AL; Oishi M; Mimata H; Gill IS
    BJU Int; 2017 Aug; 120(2):233-238. PubMed ID: 28111879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and MRI-Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy for Index Tumor Detection: Correlation with Radical Prostatectomy Specimen.
    Radtke JP; Schwab C; Wolf MB; Freitag MT; Alt CD; Kesch C; Popeneciu IV; Huettenbrink C; Gasch C; Klein T; Bonekamp D; Duensing S; Roth W; Schueler S; Stock C; Schlemmer HP; Roethke M; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
    Eur Urol; 2016 Nov; 70(5):846-853. PubMed ID: 26810346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Analysis of histological findings obtained combining US/mp-MRI fusion-guided biopsies with systematic US biopsies: mp-MRI role in prostate cancer detection and false negative.
    Faiella E; Santucci D; Greco F; Frauenfelder G; Giacobbe V; Muto G; Zobel BB; Grasso RF
    Radiol Med; 2018 Feb; 123(2):143-152. PubMed ID: 29019021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of Cancer Detection Rates Between TRUS-Guided Biopsy and MRI-Targeted Biopsy According to PSA Level in Biopsy-Naive Patients: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.
    Choi YH; Kang MY; Sung HH; Jeon HG; Chang Jeong B; Seo SI; Jeon SS; Kim CK; Park BK; Lee HM
    Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2019 Feb; 17(1):e19-e25. PubMed ID: 30415878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Real-time MRI/US fusion-guided biopsy in biopsy-naïve and pre-biopsied patients with suspicion for prostate cancer].
    Maxeiner A; Stephan C; Fischer T; Durmus T; Kilic E; Asbach P; Haas M; Günzel K; Neymeyer J; Miller K; Cash H
    Aktuelle Urol; 2015 Jan; 46(1):34-8. PubMed ID: 25519051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Magnetic Resonance and Ultrasound Image Fusion Supported Transperineal Prostate Biopsy Using the Ginsburg Protocol: Technique, Learning Points, and Biopsy Results.
    Hansen N; Patruno G; Wadhwa K; Gaziev G; Miano R; Barrett T; Gnanapragasam V; Doble A; Warren A; Bratt O; Kastner C
    Eur Urol; 2016 Aug; 70(2):332-40. PubMed ID: 26995327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Is it Time to Perform Only Magnetic Resonance Imaging Targeted Cores? Our Experience with 1,032 Men Who Underwent Prostate Biopsy.
    Pepe P; Garufi A; Priolo GD; Galia A; Fraggetta F; Pennisi M
    J Urol; 2018 Oct; 200(4):774-778. PubMed ID: 29679618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of Prospectively Assigned Likert Scores for Targeted Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Biopsies in Patients with Suspected Prostate Cancer.
    Costa DN; Lotan Y; Rofsky NM; Roehrborn C; Liu A; Hornberger B; Xi Y; Francis F; Pedrosa I
    J Urol; 2016 Jan; 195(1):80-7. PubMed ID: 26192254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of systematic transrectal biopsy to transperineal magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound-fusion biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer.
    Borkowetz A; Platzek I; Toma M; Laniado M; Baretton G; Froehner M; Koch R; Wirth M; Zastrow S
    BJU Int; 2015 Dec; 116(6):873-9. PubMed ID: 25523210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prostate cancer detection using multiparametric 3 - tesla MRI and fusion biopsy: preliminary results.
    Mussi TC; Garcia RG; Queiroz MR; Lemos GC; Baroni RH
    Int Braz J Urol; 2016; 42(5):897-905. PubMed ID: 27532112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Role of Systematic and Targeted Biopsies in Light of Overlap on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy.
    Patel N; Cricco-Lizza E; Kasabwala K; Xu C; Robinson BD; Khani F; Wang Y; Margolis D; Hu JC
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Sep; 1(4):263-267. PubMed ID: 31100246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Retrospective comparison of direct in-bore magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided biopsy and fusion-guided biopsy in patients with MRI lesions which are likely or highly likely to be clinically significant prostate cancer.
    Venderink W; van der Leest M; van Luijtelaar A; van de Ven WJM; Fütterer JJ; Sedelaar JPM; Huisman HJ
    World J Urol; 2017 Dec; 35(12):1849-1855. PubMed ID: 28871396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multiparametric MRI in detection and staging of prostate cancer.
    Boesen L
    Dan Med J; 2017 Feb; 64(2):. PubMed ID: 28157066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A prospective study of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography (MRI/US)-fusion targeted biopsy and concurrent systematic transperineal biopsy with the average of 18-cores to detect clinically significant prostate cancer.
    Hakozaki Y; Matsushima H; Kumagai J; Murata T; Masuda T; Hirai Y; Oda M; Kawauchi N; Yokoyama M; Homma Y
    BMC Urol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):117. PubMed ID: 29233150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of Gleason upgrading rates in transrectal ultrasound systematic random biopsies versus US-MRI fusion biopsies for prostate cancer.
    Kayano PP; Carneiro A; Castilho TML; Sivaraman A; Claros OR; Baroni RH; Garcia RG; Mariotti GC; Smaletz O; Filippi RZ; Lemos GC
    Int Braz J Urol; 2018; 44(6):1106-1113. PubMed ID: 30325600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relationship Between Prebiopsy Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), Biopsy Indication, and MRI-ultrasound Fusion-targeted Prostate Biopsy Outcomes.
    Meng X; Rosenkrantz AB; Mendhiratta N; Fenstermaker M; Huang R; Wysock JS; Bjurlin MA; Marshall S; Deng FM; Zhou M; Melamed J; Huang WC; Lepor H; Taneja SS
    Eur Urol; 2016 Mar; 69(3):512-7. PubMed ID: 26112001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Micro-ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Biopsies for the Diagnosis of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
    Lughezzani G; Saita A; Lazzeri M; Paciotti M; Maffei D; Lista G; Hurle R; Buffi NM; Guazzoni G; Casale P
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2019 May; 2(3):329-332. PubMed ID: 31200848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effectiveness of Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound-guided Target Biopsy in Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
    Kurokawa G; Mori K; Sasaki H; Nakano J; Takahashi Y; Iwatani K; Urabe F; Tsuzuki S; Koike Y; Sato S; Takahashi H; Miki K; Kimura T
    Anticancer Res; 2024 Feb; 44(2):679-686. PubMed ID: 38307559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. MRI in-bore biopsy following MRI/US fusion-guided biopsy in patients with persistent suspicion of clinically significant prostate cancer.
    Quentin M; Boschheidgen M; Radtke JP; Spohn F; Ullrich T; Drewes L; Valentin B; Lakes J; Al-Monajjed ; Arsov C; Esposito I; Albers P; Antoch G; Schimmöller L
    Eur J Radiol; 2024 Jun; 175():111436. PubMed ID: 38522396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.