141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28749701)
1. Fish scale artefact on an intraoral imaging receptor.
Buchanan A; Morales C; Looney S; Kalathingal S
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2017 Dec; 46(8):20170224. PubMed ID: 28749701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Perception versus reality-findings from a phosphor plate quality assurance study.
Buchanan A; Benton B; Carraway A; Looney S; Kalathingal S
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2017 Apr; 123(4):496-501. PubMed ID: 28159585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The role of software in quality assurance for indirect digital intraoral imaging.
Buchanan A; Hancock R; Kalathingal S
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2020 Sep; 130(3):313-321. PubMed ID: 32430258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Analysis of photostimulable phosphor image plate artifacts and their prevalence.
Elkhateeb SM; Aloyouny AY; Omer MMS; Mansour SM
World J Clin Cases; 2022 Jan; 10(2):437-447. PubMed ID: 35097068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of technique errors of intraoral radiographs taken on film v photostimulable phosphor (PSP) plates.
Zhang W; Huynh CP; Abramovitch K; Leon IL; Arvizu L
Tex Dent J; 2012 Jun; 129(6):589-96. PubMed ID: 22866414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Postprocessing of all-zirconia restorations in digital dental radiographs: a quality assurance predicament.
Buchanan A; Orta A; Kalathingal S
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2019 Apr; 127(4):330-338. PubMed ID: 30661961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Variable-resolution cone-beam computerized tomography with enhancement filtration compared with intraoral photostimulable phosphor radiography in detection of transverse root fractures in an in vitro model.
Wenzel A; Haiter-Neto F; Frydenberg M; Kirkevang LL
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Dec; 108(6):939-45. PubMed ID: 19875312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Antimicrobial efficiency of ethanol and 2-propanol alcohols used on contaminated storage phosphor plates and impact on durability of the plate.
Wenzel A; Kornum F; Knudsen M; Lau EF
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(6):20120353. PubMed ID: 23420856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of older and newer versions of intraoral digital radiography systems: diagnosing noncavitated proximal carious lesions.
Haiter-Neto F; dos Anjos Pontual A; Frydenberg M; Wenzel A
J Am Dent Assoc; 2007 Oct; 138(10):1353-9; quiz 1382-3. PubMed ID: 17908850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of Efficiency and Image Quality of Photostimulable Phosphor Plate and Charge-Coupled Device Receptors in Dental Radiography.
Zhang W; Huynh C; Jadhav A; Pinales J; Arvizu L; Tsai J; Flores N
J Dent Educ; 2019 Oct; 83(10):1205-1212. PubMed ID: 31235501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparisons of physical imaging properties among three kinds of imaging plates used in photostimulable phosphor systems for dental radiography.
Nishikawa K; Ooguro T; Kuroyanagi K
Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 2002 Feb; 43(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 12013822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Infection control in digital intraoral radiography: evaluation of microbiological contamination of photostimulable phosphor plates in barrier envelopes.
MacDonald DS; Waterfield JD
J Can Dent Assoc; 2011; 77():b93. PubMed ID: 21929948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reproducibility of pixel values for two photostimulable phosphor plates in consecutive standardized scannings.
Freitas P; Yaedú RY; Rubira-Bullen IR; Escarpinati M; Vieira MC; Schiabel H; Lauris JR
Braz Oral Res; 2006; 20(3):207-13. PubMed ID: 17119702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of intraoral image artifacts related to photostimulable phosphor plates in a dentomaxillofacial radiology department.
Gulsahi A; Secgin CK
Niger J Clin Pract; 2016; 19(2):248-53. PubMed ID: 26856290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Definition, classification and retrospective analysis of photostimulable phosphor image artefacts and errors in intraoral dental radiography.
Çalışkan A; Sumer AP
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2017 Mar; 46(3):20160188. PubMed ID: 27883287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Comparison of Technique Errors using Two Radiographic Intra-oral Receptor-holding Devices.
Mauriello SM; Tang Q; Johnson KB; Hadgraft HH; Platin E
J Dent Hyg; 2015 Dec; 89(6):384-9. PubMed ID: 26684996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Subjective image quality of solid-state and photostimulable phosphor systems for digital intra-oral radiography.
Borg E; Attaelmanan A; Gröndahl HG
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Mar; 29(2):70-5. PubMed ID: 10808218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Hypochlorous acid and white vinegar: Artifact-free COVID-19 disinfection options for photostimulable storage phosphor plates.
Pamukcu U; Peker I
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2022 Sep; 134(3):367-374. PubMed ID: 35869016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison between intraoral indirect and conventional film-based imaging for the detection of dental root fractures: an ex vivo study.
Shintaku WH; Venturin JS; Noujeim M; Dove SB
Dent Traumatol; 2013 Dec; 29(6):445-9. PubMed ID: 23566073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dose response of a storage phosphor system for intraoral radiography.
Stamatakis HC; Welander U; McDavid WD
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Sep; 28(5):272-6. PubMed ID: 10490744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
