These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28749895)

  • 1. Mechanical Modeling of a Keratoconic Cornea.
    Perone JM; Conart JB; Bertaux PJ; Sujet-Perone N; Ouamara N; Sot M; Henry JJ
    Cornea; 2017 Oct; 36(10):1263-1266. PubMed ID: 28749895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Keratoconus prediction using a finite element model of the cornea with local biomechanical properties.
    Carvalho LA; Prado M; Cunha RH; Costa Neto A; Paranhos A; Schor P; Chamon W
    Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2009; 72(2):139-45. PubMed ID: 19466318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Changes of corneal biomechanics with keratoconus.
    Wolffsohn JS; Safeen S; Shah S; Laiquzzaman M
    Cornea; 2012 Aug; 31(8):849-54. PubMed ID: 22495031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biomechanical and refractive behaviors of keratoconic cornea based on three-dimensional anisotropic hyperelastic models.
    Han Z; Sui X; Zhou D; Zhou C; Ren Q
    J Refract Surg; 2013 Apr; 29(4):282-90. PubMed ID: 23557227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biomechanical analysis of the keratoconic cornea.
    Gefen A; Shalom R; Elad D; Mandel Y
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2009 Jul; 2(3):224-36. PubMed ID: 19627827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biomechanical properties of early keratoconus: Suppressed deformation signal wave.
    Hashemi H; Beiranvand A; Yekta A; Asharlous A; Khabazkhoob M
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2017 Apr; 40(2):104-108. PubMed ID: 27956045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relationship of Structural Characteristics to Biomechanical Profile in Normal, Keratoconic, and Crosslinked Eyes.
    Viswanathan D; Kumar NL; Males JJ; Graham SL
    Cornea; 2015 Jul; 34(7):791-6. PubMed ID: 25850703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Second-generation corneal deformation signal waveform analysis in normal, forme fruste keratoconic, and manifest keratoconic corneas after statistical correction for potentially confounding factors.
    Zhang L; Danesh J; Tannan A; Phan V; Yu F; Hamilton DR
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Oct; 41(10):2196-204. PubMed ID: 26703296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Corneal elasticity and ocular rigidity in normal and keratoconic eyes.
    Edmund C
    Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1988 Apr; 66(2):134-40. PubMed ID: 3389085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Corneal biomechanical property measurement with an IOP loading method in keratoconic patients.
    Sergienko NM; Shargorodska IV
    Curr Eye Res; 2014 Oct; 39(10):994-9. PubMed ID: 24654976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biomechanical properties of the keratoconic cornea: a review.
    Vellara HR; Patel DV
    Clin Exp Optom; 2015 Jan; 98(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 25545947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biomechanical responses of healthy and keratoconic corneas measured using a noncontact scheimpflug-based tonometer.
    Ali NQ; Patel DV; McGhee CN
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 May; 55(6):3651-9. PubMed ID: 24833745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of ocular biomechanics using dynamic ultra high-speed Scheimpflug imaging in keratoconic and normal eyes.
    Tian L; Ko MW; Wang LK; Zhang JY; Li TJ; Huang YF; Zheng YP
    J Refract Surg; 2014 Nov; 30(11):785-91. PubMed ID: 25291757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In vivo biomechanical mapping of normal and keratoconus corneas.
    Scarcelli G; Besner S; Pineda R; Kalout P; Yun SH
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2015 Apr; 133(4):480-2. PubMed ID: 25611213
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biomechanical evaluation of cornea in topographically normal relatives of patients with keratoconus.
    Kara N; Altinkaynak H; Baz O; Goker Y
    Cornea; 2013 Mar; 32(3):262-6. PubMed ID: 22677642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Combining ocular response analyzer metrics for corneal biomechanical diagnosis.
    Ruiseñor Vázquez PR; Delrivo M; Bonthoux FF; Pförtner T; Galletti JG
    J Refract Surg; 2013 Sep; 29(9):596-602. PubMed ID: 23848186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dynamic Scheimpflug-based assessment of keratoconus and the effects of corneal cross-linking.
    Bak-Nielsen S; Pedersen IB; Ivarsen A; Hjortdal J
    J Refract Surg; 2014 Jun; 30(6):408-14. PubMed ID: 24972407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. New Scheimpflug Dynamic In Vivo Curve Analyses to Characterize Biomechanical Changes of the Cornea After Cross-linking for Progressive Keratoconus.
    Steinberg J; Frings A; Mousli A; Casagrande MK; Druchkiv V; Katz T; Linke SJ
    J Refract Surg; 2016 Jan; 32(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 26812712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The relationship between corneal biomechanical properties and confocal microscopy findings in normal and keratoconic eyes.
    Hurmeric V; Sahin A; Ozge G; Bayer A
    Cornea; 2010 Jun; 29(6):641-9. PubMed ID: 20458238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Corneal topography and elasticity in normal and keratoconic eyes. A methodological study concerning the pathogenesis of keratoconus.
    Edmund C
    Acta Ophthalmol Suppl (1985); 1989; 193():1-36. PubMed ID: 2552742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.