These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28750136)

  • 1. Changes in margin re-excision rates: Experience incorporating the "no ink on tumor" guideline into practice.
    Patten CR; Walsh K; Sarantou T; Hadzikadic-Gusic L; Forster MR; Robinson M; White RL
    J Surg Oncol; 2017 Dec; 116(8):1040-1045. PubMed ID: 28750136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Current margin practice and effect on re-excision rates following the publication of the SSO-ASTRO consensus and ABS consensus guidelines: a national prospective study of 2858 women undergoing breast-conserving therapy in the UK and Ireland.
    Tang SS; Kaptanis S; Haddow JB; Mondani G; Elsberger B; Tasoulis MK; Obondo C; Johns N; Ismail W; Syed A; Kissias P; Venn M; Sundaramoorthy S; Irwin G; Sami AS; Elfadl D; Baggaley A; Remoundos DD; Langlands F; Charalampoudis P; Barber Z; Hamilton-Burke WLS; Khan A; Sirianni C; Merker LAG; Saha S; Lane RA; Chopra S; Dupré S; Manning AT; St John ER; Musbahi A; Dlamini N; McArdle CL; Wright C; Murphy JO; Aggarwal R; Dordea M; Bosch K; Egbeare D; Osman H; Tayeh S; Razi F; Iqbal J; Ledwidge SFC; Albert V; Masannat Y
    Eur J Cancer; 2017 Oct; 84():315-324. PubMed ID: 28865259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of Practice Patterns Following Publication of the SSO-ASTRO Consensus Guideline on Margins for Breast-Conserving Therapy in Stage I and II Invasive Breast Cancer.
    DeSnyder SM; Hunt KK; Smith BD; Moran MS; Klimberg S; Lucci A
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Oct; 22(10):3250-6. PubMed ID: 26202554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. American Society of Breast Surgeons' Practice Patterns After Publication of the SSO-ASTRO-ASCO DCIS Consensus Guideline on Margins for Breast-Conserving Surgery With Whole-Breast Irradiation.
    DeSnyder SM; Hunt KK; Dong W; Smith BD; Moran MS; Chavez-MacGregor M; Shen Y; Kuerer HM; Lucci A
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2018 Oct; 25(10):2965-2974. PubMed ID: 29987598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of SSO-ASTRO margin guidelines on reoperation rates following breast-conserving surgery.
    Monaghan A; Chapinal N; Hughes L; Baliski C
    Am J Surg; 2019 May; 217(5):862-867. PubMed ID: 30739736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Re-excision rates after breast conserving surgery following the 2014 SSO-ASTRO guidelines.
    Heelan Gladden AA; Sams S; Gleisner A; Finlayson C; Kounalakis N; Hosokawa P; Brown R; Chong T; Mathes D; Murphy C
    Am J Surg; 2017 Dec; 214(6):1104-1109. PubMed ID: 28974314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of the SSO-ASTRO Margin Guideline on Rates of Re-excision After Lumpectomy for Breast Cancer: A Meta-analysis.
    Havel L; Naik H; Ramirez L; Morrow M; Landercasper J
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2019 May; 26(5):1238-1244. PubMed ID: 30790112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reexcision Surgery for Breast Cancer: An Analysis of the American Society of Breast Surgeons (ASBrS) Mastery
    Schulman AM; Mirrielees JA; Leverson G; Landercasper J; Greenberg C; Wilke LG
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2017 Jan; 24(1):52-58. PubMed ID: 27581607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of SSO-ASTRO Margin Guidelines on Re-excision Rate in Breast-conserving Surgery: A Single-center Experience.
    Urooj N; Abubakar M; Asghar K; Hassan M; Malik AA; Rehman B; Sajjad B; Farooqi N; Chaudhry Z; Parvaiz A; Khan A
    J Cancer Allied Spec; 2024; 10(1):559. PubMed ID: 38259677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in stage I and II invasive breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology endorsement of the Society of Surgical Oncology/American Society for Radiation Oncology consensus guideline.
    Buchholz TA; Somerfield MR; Griggs JJ; El-Eid S; Hammond ME; Lyman GH; Mason G; Newman LA
    J Clin Oncol; 2014 May; 32(14):1502-6. PubMed ID: 24711553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Margin re-excision and local recurrence in invasive breast cancer: A cost analysis using a decision tree model.
    Abe SE; Hill JS; Han Y; Walsh K; Symanowski JT; Hadzikadic-Gusic L; Flippo-Morton T; Sarantou T; Forster M; White RL
    J Surg Oncol; 2015 Sep; 112(4):443-8. PubMed ID: 26374088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Surgical Options and Locoregional Recurrence in Patients Diagnosed with Invasive Lobular Carcinoma of the Breast.
    Sagara Y; Barry WT; Mallory MA; Vaz-Luis I; Aydogan F; Brock JE; Winer EP; Golshan M; Metzger-Filho O
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Dec; 22(13):4280-6. PubMed ID: 25893416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cost Analysis of a Surgical Consensus Guideline in Breast-Conserving Surgery.
    Yu J; Elmore LC; Cyr AE; Aft RL; Gillanders WE; Margenthaler JA
    J Am Coll Surg; 2017 Aug; 225(2):294-301. PubMed ID: 28414115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rates of residual disease with close but negative margins in breast cancer surgery.
    Garvey EM; Senior DA; Pockaj BA; Wasif N; Dueck AC; McCullough AE; Ocal IT; Gray RJ
    Breast; 2015 Aug; 24(4):413-7. PubMed ID: 25845608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Close/positive margins after breast-conserving therapy: additional resection or no resection?
    Wood WC
    Breast; 2013 Aug; 22 Suppl 2():S115-7. PubMed ID: 24074771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intra-operative touch preparation cytology; does it have a role in re-excision lumpectomy?
    Valdes EK; Boolbol SK; Cohen JM; Feldman SM
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Mar; 14(3):1045-50. PubMed ID: 17206481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Changes in Reoperation After Publication of Consensus Guidelines on Margins for Breast-Conserving Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Marinovich ML; Noguchi N; Morrow M; Houssami N
    JAMA Surg; 2020 Oct; 155(10):e203025. PubMed ID: 32857107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Negative margin status improves local control in conservatively managed breast cancer patients.
    Obedian E; Haffty BG
    Cancer J Sci Am; 2000; 6(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 10696736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Revisiting surgical margins for invasive breast cancer patients treated with breast conservation therapy - Evidence for adopting a 1 mm negative width.
    Rakha EA; Quinn C; Masannat YA; Lee AHS; Tan PH; Karakatsanis A; Matrai ZT; Al Shaibani SHM; Gehani SA; Shaaban A; Khout H; Chagla L; Cserni G; Varga Z; Yong WF; Meattini I; Kulka J; Yang W; Tse GM; Pinder SE; Fox S; Dixon JM
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2024 Oct; 50(10):108573. PubMed ID: 39243583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Implications of New Lumpectomy Margin Guidelines for Breast-Conserving Surgery: Changes in Reexcision Rates and Predicted Rates of Residual Tumor.
    Merrill AL; Coopey SB; Tang R; McEvoy MP; Specht MC; Hughes KS; Gadd MA; Smith BL
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Mar; 23(3):729-34. PubMed ID: 26467458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.