These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28750599)

  • 21. Effects of the timing and identity of retrieval cues in individual recall: an attempt to mimic cross-cueing in collaborative recall.
    Andersson J; Hitch G; Meudell P
    Memory; 2006 Jan; 14(1):94-103. PubMed ID: 16423746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The Effect of Item Similarity and Response Competition Manipulations on Collaborative Inhibition in Group Recall.
    Zhang H; Fu Y; Zhang X; Shi J
    Sci Rep; 2017 Sep; 7(1):11946. PubMed ID: 28931904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Mutual inhibition in collaborative recall: evidence for a retrieval-based account.
    Finlay F; Hitch GJ; Meudell PR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2000 Nov; 26(6):1556-67. PubMed ID: 11185782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A comparison of group and individual remembering: does collaboration disrupt retrieval strategies?
    Basden BH; Basden DR; Bryner S; Thomas RL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1997 Sep; 23(5):1176-91. PubMed ID: 9293628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Collaboration enhances later individual memory for emotional material.
    Bärthel GA; Wessel I; Huntjens RJ; Verwoerd J
    Memory; 2017 May; 25(5):636-646. PubMed ID: 27403926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Collaborative remembering in older adults: age-invariant outcomes in the context of episodic recall deficits.
    Henkel LA; Rajaram S
    Psychol Aging; 2011 Sep; 26(3):532-545. PubMed ID: 21463054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Survival processing eliminates collaborative inhibition.
    Reysen MB; Bliss H; Baker MA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Jun; 71(6):1340-1347. PubMed ID: 28398121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Study repetition and divided attention: effects of encoding manipulations on collaborative inhibition in group recall.
    Pereira-Pasarin LP; Rajaram S
    Mem Cognit; 2011 Aug; 39(6):968-76. PubMed ID: 21503804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Collaboration and prospective memory: comparing nominal and collaborative group performance in strangers and couples.
    Browning CA; Harris CB; Van Bergen P; Barnier AJ; Rendell PG
    Memory; 2018 Oct; 26(9):1206-1219. PubMed ID: 29388873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Patterns of interaction-dominant dynamics in individual versus collaborative memory foraging.
    Szary J; Dale R; Kello CT; Rhodes T
    Cogn Process; 2015 Nov; 16(4):389-99. PubMed ID: 26314586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Does test delay eliminate collaborative inhibition?
    Takahashi M; Saito S
    Memory; 2004 Nov; 12(6):722-31. PubMed ID: 15724361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Collaborative inhibition in spatial memory retrieval.
    Sjolund LA; Erdman M; Kelly JW
    Mem Cognit; 2014 Aug; 42(6):876-85. PubMed ID: 24622929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Children's collaborative recall of shared and unshared information.
    Gummerum M; Leman PJ; Hollins TS
    Br J Dev Psychol; 2013 Sep; 31(Pt 3):302-17. PubMed ID: 23901844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Elimination of collaborative inhibition effect using the Method of Loci.
    Saraiva M; Albuquerque PB; Arantes J
    Psicothema; 2016 May; 28(2):181-6. PubMed ID: 27112816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The joint influence of collaboration and part-set cueing.
    Kelley MR; Pentz C; Reysen MB
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014 Oct; 67(10):1977-85. PubMed ID: 24460096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Deficits in memory retrieval: an argument in favor of frontal subcortical dysfunction in depression].
    Fossati P; Deweer B; Raoux N; Allilaire JF
    Encephale; 1995; 21(4):295-305. PubMed ID: 7588169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Expertise promotes facilitation on a collaborative memory task.
    Meade ML; Nokes TJ; Morrow DG
    Memory; 2009 Jan; 17(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 19105086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. On why the elderly have normal semantic retrieval but deficient episodic encoding: a study of left inferior frontal ERP activity.
    Nessler D; Johnson R; Bersick M; Friedman D
    Neuroimage; 2006 Mar; 30(1):299-312. PubMed ID: 16242350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Remembering with a friend or a stranger: comparing acquainted and unacquainted pairs in collaborative eyewitness interviews.
    Vredeveldt A; van Deuren S; van Koppen PJ
    Memory; 2019 Nov; 27(10):1390-1403. PubMed ID: 31500512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Disrupters as Well as Monitors: Roles of Others During and After Collaborative Remembering in the DRM Procedure.
    Nie A; Ke C; Li M; Guo B
    Adv Cogn Psychol; 2019; 15(4):276-289. PubMed ID: 32494313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.