These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

80 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28750702)

  • 1. Evidence on Blood Pressure Measurement Methodology and Clinical Implementation: Research Agenda for the 21st Century.
    Stergiou GS; Kollias A; Protogerou AD
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2017 Aug; 70(5):587-589. PubMed ID: 28750702
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Auscultatory versus oscillometric measurement of blood pressure in octogenarians.
    Rosholm JU; Arnspang S; Matzen L; Jacobsen IA
    Blood Press; 2012 Oct; 21(5):269-72. PubMed ID: 22545576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Is one measurement enough to evaluate blood pressure among adolescents? A blood pressure screening experience in more than 9000 children with a subset comparison of auscultatory to mercury measurements.
    Negroni-Balasquide X; Bell CS; Samuel J; Samuels JA
    J Am Soc Hypertens; 2016 Feb; 10(2):95-100. PubMed ID: 26875474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Automatic blood pressure measurement: the oscillometric waveform shape is a potential contributor to differences between oscillometric and auscultatory pressure measurements.
    Amoore JN; Lemesre Y; Murray IC; Mieke S; King ST; Smith FE; Murray A
    J Hypertens; 2008 Jan; 26(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 18090538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of the shapes of the oscillometric pulse amplitude envelopes and their characteristic ratios on the differences between auscultatory and oscillometric blood pressure measurements.
    Amoore JN; Vacher E; Murray IC; Mieke S; King ST; Smith FE; Murray A
    Blood Press Monit; 2007 Oct; 12(5):297-305. PubMed ID: 17890968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. From Korotkoff and Marey to automatic non-invasive oscillometric blood pressure measurement: does easiness come with reliability?
    Benmira A; Perez-Martin A; Schuster I; Aichoun I; Coudray S; Bereksi-Reguig F; Dauzat M
    Expert Rev Med Devices; 2016; 13(2):179-89. PubMed ID: 26641026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparability of oscillometric to simultaneous auscultatory blood pressure measurement in children.
    Ringrose JS; Alabbas A; Jalali A; Khinda H; Morgan C; Yiu V; Alexander RT; Padwal R
    Blood Press Monit; 2019 Apr; 24(2):83-88. PubMed ID: 30856623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantitative Assessment of Blood Pressure Measurement Accuracy and Variability from Visual Auscultation Method by Observers without Receiving Medical Training.
    Chen W; Chen F; Feng Y; Chen A; Zheng D
    Biomed Res Int; 2017; 2017():3537079. PubMed ID: 29423405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Oscillometric and auscultatory blood pressure measurement methods in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Duncombe SL; Voss C; Harris KC
    J Hypertens; 2017 Feb; 35(2):213-224. PubMed ID: 27870656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparative study of the measurement of mean arterial blood pressure using automatic oscillometers, arterial cannulation and auscultation.
    Rutten AJ; Ilsley AH; Skowronski GA; Runciman WB
    Anaesth Intensive Care; 1986 Feb; 14(1):58-65. PubMed ID: 3954015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [A comparison of intra-arterial, oscillometric and auscultatory measurements of blood pressure--influence of blood pressure level and arteriosclerosis].
    Goh R; Saito T; Arase T; Higuchi S
    Masui; 1988 Feb; 37(2):189-96. PubMed ID: 3373729
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [ON THE VALUE OF THE SYSTOLIC CRITERIA IN AUSCULTATORY INDIRECT BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT].
    KOHN R; KUHN E
    Z Kreislaufforsch; 1964 Jan; 53():62-7. PubMed ID: 14155971
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the accuracy of non-invasive automatic blood pressure monitors.
    Kawahara M
    Anesth Prog; 1990; 37(5):244-7. PubMed ID: 2096748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of automated oscillometric versus auscultatory blood pressure measurement.
    Landgraf J; Wishner SH; Kloner RA
    Am J Cardiol; 2010 Aug; 106(3):386-8. PubMed ID: 20643251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. DR. N. C. KOROTKOFF, DISCOVERER OF THE AUSCULTATORY METHOD FOR MEASURING ARTERIAL PRESSURE.
    SEGAL HN
    Ann Intern Med; 1965 Jul; 63():147-9. PubMed ID: 14305963
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of overcuffing on the accuracy of oscillometric blood pressure measurements.
    Ringrose J; Millay J; Babwick SA; Neil M; Langkaas LA; Padwal R
    J Am Soc Hypertens; 2015 Jul; 9(7):563-8. PubMed ID: 26101170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improving auscultatory blood pressure measurement with electronic and computer technology: the visual auscultation method.
    Wang Y; She J; Xiang H; Li Y; Liu J; Li D; Yu M
    Am J Hypertens; 2009 Jun; 22(6):624-9. PubMed ID: 19265786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of automatic oscillometric arterial pressure measurement with conventional auscultatory measurement in the labour ward.
    Hasan MA; Thomas TA; Prys-Roberts C
    Br J Anaesth; 1993 Feb; 70(2):141-4. PubMed ID: 8435255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The duration of certain phases of sound in blood pressure determination by the auscultatory method.
    TODD RL
    J Lancet; 1948 Jun; 68(6):246. PubMed ID: 18860612
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of Cuff Design on Auscultatory and Oscillometric Blood Pressure Measurements.
    Ringrose JS; McLean D; Ao P; Yousefi F; Sankaralingam S; Millay J; Padwal R
    Am J Hypertens; 2016 Sep; 29(9):1063-9. PubMed ID: 27099256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.