These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
400 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28751374)
21. Use of surface EMG for studying motor unit recruitment during isometric linear force ramp. Hogrel JY J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2003 Oct; 13(5):417-23. PubMed ID: 12932415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Fine-wire recordings of flexor hallucis brevis motor units up to maximal voluntary contraction reveal a flexible, nonrigid mechanism for force control. Aeles J; Kelly LA; Yoshitake Y; Cresswell AG J Neurophysiol; 2020 May; 123(5):1766-1774. PubMed ID: 32267195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Experimental analysis of accuracy in the identification of motor unit spike trains from high-density surface EMG. Holobar A; Minetto MA; Botter A; Negro F; Farina D IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2010 Jun; 18(3):221-9. PubMed ID: 20144921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Spectral characterization of human leg EMG signals from an open access dataset for the development of computational models. de Freitas RM; Kohn AF PLoS One; 2024; 19(4):e0302632. PubMed ID: 38683859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Changes in motor unit firing rate in synergist muscles cannot explain the maintenance of force during constant force painful contractions. Hodges PW; Ervilha UF; Graven-Nielsen T J Pain; 2008 Dec; 9(12):1169-74. PubMed ID: 18755636 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. You are as fast as your motor neurons: speed of recruitment and maximal discharge of motor neurons determine the maximal rate of force development in humans. Del Vecchio A; Negro F; Holobar A; Casolo A; Folland JP; Felici F; Farina D J Physiol; 2019 May; 597(9):2445-2456. PubMed ID: 30768687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Motor unit recruitment during constant low force and long duration muscle contractions investigated with surface electromyography. Gazzoni M; Farina D; Merletti R Acta Physiol Pharmacol Bulg; 2001; 26(1-2):67-71. PubMed ID: 11693405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Motor unit conduction velocity during sustained contraction of the vastus medialis muscle. Hedayatpour N; Arendt-Nielsen L; Farina D Exp Brain Res; 2007 Jul; 180(3):509-16. PubMed ID: 17287989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Robust and accurate decoding of motoneuron behaviour and prediction of the resulting force output. Thompson CK; Negro F; Johnson MD; Holmes MR; McPherson LM; Powers RK; Farina D; Heckman CJ J Physiol; 2018 Jul; 596(14):2643-2659. PubMed ID: 29726002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Effect of muscle-fiber velocity recovery function on motor unit action potential properties in voluntary contractions. Farina D; Falla D Muscle Nerve; 2008 May; 37(5):650-8. PubMed ID: 18085714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Neural control of matched motor units during muscle shortening and lengthening at increasing velocities. Oliveira AS; Negro F J Appl Physiol (1985); 2021 Jun; 130(6):1798-1813. PubMed ID: 33955258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Properties of Motor Units of Elbow and Ankle Muscles Decomposed Using High-Density Surface EMG. Hassan AS; Kim EH; Khurram OU; Cummings M; Thompson CK; Miller McPherson L; Heckman CJ; Dewald JPA; Negro F Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2019 Jul; 2019():3874-3878. PubMed ID: 31946719 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Neural and muscular determinants of maximal rate of force development. Dideriksen JL; Del Vecchio A; Farina D J Neurophysiol; 2020 Jan; 123(1):149-157. PubMed ID: 31618103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The effects of local forearm muscle cooling on motor unit properties. Mallette MM; Green LA; Gabriel DA; Cheung SS Eur J Appl Physiol; 2018 Feb; 118(2):401-410. PubMed ID: 29222596 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison between the degree of motor unit short-term synchronization and recurrence quantification analysis of the surface EMG in two human muscles. Dideriksen JL; Falla D; Bækgaard M; Mogensen ML; Steimle KL; Farina D Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 Dec; 120(12):2086-2092. PubMed ID: 19828371 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Spike-triggered average torque and muscle fiber conduction velocity of low-threshold motor units following submaximal endurance contractions. Farina D; Arendt-Nielsen L; Graven-Nielsen T J Appl Physiol (1985); 2005 Apr; 98(4):1495-502. PubMed ID: 15542567 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Assessment of single motor unit conduction velocity during sustained contractions of the tibialis anterior muscle with advanced spike triggered averaging. Farina D; Arendt-Nielsen L; Merletti R; Graven-Nielsen T J Neurosci Methods; 2002 Mar; 115(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 11897359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The influence of contraction amplitude and firing history on spike-triggered averaged trapezius motor unit potentials. Westad C; Westgaard RH J Physiol; 2005 Feb; 562(Pt 3):965-75. PubMed ID: 15576452 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Do additional inputs change maximal voluntary motor unit firing rates after spinal cord injury? Zijdewind I; Gant K; Bakels R; Thomas CK Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2012 Jan; 26(1):58-67. PubMed ID: 21903974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]