These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28752549)

  • 1. Choice predicts the feedback negativity.
    McGill S; Buckley J; Elliffe D; Corballis PM
    Psychophysiology; 2017 Dec; 54(12):1800-1811. PubMed ID: 28752549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reduced risk avoidance and altered neural correlates of feedback processing in patients with borderline personality disorder.
    Endrass T; Schuermann B; Roepke S; Kessler-Scheil S; Kathmann N
    Psychiatry Res; 2016 Sep; 243():14-22. PubMed ID: 27344588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. ERP correlates of feedback and reward processing in the presence and absence of response choice.
    Yeung N; Holroyd CB; Cohen JD
    Cereb Cortex; 2005 May; 15(5):535-44. PubMed ID: 15319308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Better late than never? The effect of feedback delay on ERP indices of reward processing.
    Weinberg A; Luhmann CC; Bress JN; Hajcak G
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2012 Dec; 12(4):671-7. PubMed ID: 22752976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perceptual Salience and Reward Both Influence Feedback-Related Neural Activity Arising from Choice.
    Lou B; Hsu WY; Sajda P
    J Neurosci; 2015 Sep; 35(38):13064-75. PubMed ID: 26400937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The influence of the magnitude, probability, and valence of potential wins and losses on the amplitude of the feedback negativity.
    Kreussel L; Hewig J; Kretschmer N; Hecht H; Coles MG; Miltner WH
    Psychophysiology; 2012 Feb; 49(2):207-19. PubMed ID: 22091824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Independent coding of reward magnitude and valence in the human brain.
    Yeung N; Sanfey AG
    J Neurosci; 2004 Jul; 24(28):6258-64. PubMed ID: 15254080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The P300 and reward valence, magnitude, and expectancy in outcome evaluation.
    Wu Y; Zhou X
    Brain Res; 2009 Aug; 1286():114-22. PubMed ID: 19539614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Processing of expected and unexpected monetary performance outcomes in healthy older subjects.
    Bellebaum C; Kobza S; Thiele S; Daum I
    Behav Neurosci; 2011 Apr; 125(2):241-51. PubMed ID: 21280937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ready, set, explore! Event-related potentials reveal the time-course of exploratory decisions.
    Hassall CD; McDonald CG; Krigolson OE
    Brain Res; 2019 Sep; 1719():183-193. PubMed ID: 31152692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Show me the Money: the impact of actual rewards and losses on the feedback negativity.
    Weinberg A; Riesel A; Proudfit GH
    Brain Cogn; 2014 Jun; 87():134-9. PubMed ID: 24735733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reward Sensitivity (Behavioral Activation System), Cognitive, and Metacognitive Control in Gambling Behavior: Evidences From Behavioral, Feedback-Related Negativity, and P300 Effect.
    Balconi M; Finocchiaro R; Canavesio Y
    J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci; 2015; 27(3):219-27. PubMed ID: 26067438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. It is less than you expected: the feedback-related negativity reflects violations of reward magnitude expectations.
    Bellebaum C; Polezzi D; Daum I
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Sep; 48(11):3343-50. PubMed ID: 20655319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How we learn to make decisions: rapid propagation of reinforcement learning prediction errors in humans.
    Krigolson OE; Hassall CD; Handy TC
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2014 Mar; 26(3):635-44. PubMed ID: 24168216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On the joint control of preference by time and reinforcer-ratio variation.
    Davison M; Cowie S; Elliffe D
    Behav Processes; 2013 May; 95():100-12. PubMed ID: 23410902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Local preference in concurrent schedules: the effects of reinforcer sequences.
    Krägeloh CU; Davison M; Elliffe DM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2005 Jul; 84(1):37-64. PubMed ID: 16156136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Choice in a variable environment: every reinforcer counts.
    Davison M; Baum WM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2000 Jul; 74(1):1-24. PubMed ID: 10966094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Preference and resistance to change with constant-duration schedule components.
    Nevin JA; Grace RC
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2000 Jul; 74(1):79-100. PubMed ID: 10966097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Rapid acquisition of preference in concurrent schedules: effects of reinforcement amount.
    Maguire DR; Hughes CE; Pitts RC
    Behav Processes; 2007 Jun; 75(2):213-9. PubMed ID: 17416469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Expectancy affects the feedback-related negativity (FRN) for delayed feedback in probabilistic learning.
    Weismüller B; Bellebaum C
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Nov; 53(11):1739-1750. PubMed ID: 27565454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.