114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28752611)
1. Quality assessment and improvement of "Unsatisfactory" liquid-based cervicovaginal papanicolaou smears.
Mirzamani N; Chau K; Rafael O; Shergill U; Sajjan S; Sumskaya I; Gimenez C; Klein M; Das K
Diagn Cytopathol; 2017 Oct; 45(10):873-877. PubMed ID: 28752611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cell preparation methods and criteria for sample adequacy. International Academy of Cytology Task Force summary. Diagnostic Cytology Towards the 21st Century: An International Expert Conference and Tutorial.
McGoogan E; Colgan TJ; Ramzy I; Cochand-Priollet B; Davey DD; Grohs HK; Gurley AM; Husain OA; Hutchinson ML; Knesel EA; Linder J; Mango LJ; Mitchell H; Peebles A; Reith A; Robinowitz M; Sauer T; Shida S; Solomon D; Topalidis T; Wilbur DC; Yamauchi K
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 9479321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Applicability of On-Site Evaluation of Cervical Cytology Smears Stained with Toluidine Blue to Reduce Unsatisfactory Results.
Tummidi S; Shankaralingappa A; Sharmila V
Acta Cytol; 2022; 66(6):513-523. PubMed ID: 36215977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reprocessing unsatisfactory ThinPrep Papanicolaou test specimens increases sample adequacy and detection of significant cervicovaginal lesions.
Islam S; West AM; Saboorian MH; Ashfaq R
Cancer; 2004 Apr; 102(2):67-73. PubMed ID: 15098249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical significance of unsatisfactory conventional pap smears owing to inadequate squamous cellularity defined by the Bethesda 2001 criterion.
Adams AL; Gidley J; Roberson J; Wang W; Eltoum I; Chhieng DC
Am J Clin Pathol; 2005 May; 123(5):738-43. PubMed ID: 15981813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Unsatisfactory reporting rates: 2006 practices of participants in the college of american pathologists interlaboratory comparison program in gynecologic cytology.
Moriarty AT; Clayton AC; Zaleski S; Henry MR; Schwartz MR; Eversole GM; Tench WD; Fatheree LA; Souers RJ; Wilbur DC
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2009 Dec; 133(12):1912-6. PubMed ID: 19961244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of the new Bethesda System 2001 on specimen adequacy of conventional cervicovaginal smears.
Fidda N; Miron J; Rodgers WH; Rader A
Diagn Cytopathol; 2004 Apr; 30(4):235-9. PubMed ID: 15048956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Performance of monolayered cervical smears in a gynecology outpatient setting in Kuwait.
Luthra UK; Chishti M; Dey P; Jolly SV; Abdulla M; Das DK; Sugathan TN; Ajrawi MT; George J; George SS; Aziz AA; al-Juwaiser A; Karim FA; Mallik MK; Sheikh ZA; Khan S
Acta Cytol; 2002; 46(2):303-10. PubMed ID: 11917577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accurate assessment of cell density in low cellular liquid-based cervical cytology.
Siebers AG; van der Laak JA; Huberts-Manders R; Vedder JE; Bulten J
Cytopathology; 2013 Aug; 24(4):216-21. PubMed ID: 22708685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Should adequacy criteria in cervicovaginal cytology be modified after radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or hysterectomy?
Lu CH; Chang CC; Ho ES; Chen SJ; Lin SJ; Fu TF; Chang MC
Cancer Cytopathol; 2010 Dec; 118(6):474-81. PubMed ID: 20862703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Liquid-based cervical cytology ThinPrep screening in Hungary].
Bak M; Séberné Éll M; Bóka M; Veleczki Z; Nyári T; Pete I; Szentirmay Z
Orv Hetil; 2014 May; 155(18):708-14. PubMed ID: 24776385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Review of negative Papanicolaou tests. Is the retrospective 5-year review necessary?
Allen KA; Zaleski S; Cohen MB
Am J Clin Pathol; 1994 Jan; 101(1):19-21. PubMed ID: 8279450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinicopathological significance of atypical glandular cells on cervicovaginal Pap smears.
Kim MK; Lee YK; Hong SR; Lim KT
Diagn Cytopathol; 2017 Oct; 45(10):867-872. PubMed ID: 28771986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Daily peer review of abnormal cervical smears in the assessment of individual practice as an additional method of internal quality control.
Confortini M; Di Stefano C; Biggeri A; Bulgaresi P; Di Claudio G; Grisotto L; Maddau C; Matucci M; Petreschi C; Troni GM; Turco P; Foxi P
Cytopathology; 2016 Feb; 27(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 25123613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The determination of Papanicolaou smear adequacy using a semiquantitative method to evaluate cellularity.
Valente PT; Schantz HD; Trabal JF
Diagn Cytopathol; 1991; 7(6):576-80. PubMed ID: 1769285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bethesda System reporting rates for conventional Papanicolaou tests and liquid-based cytology in a large Chinese, College of American Pathologists-certified independent medical laboratory: analysis of 1394389 Papanicolaou test reports.
Zheng B; Austin RM; Liang X; Li Z; Chen C; Yan S; Zhao C
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2015 Mar; 139(3):373-7. PubMed ID: 25724034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Abnormal cervicovaginal cytology, unsatisfactory colposcopy and the use of vaginal estrogen cream: an observational study of clinical outcomes for women in low estrogen states.
Richards A; Dalrymple C
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2015 Mar; 41(3):440-4. PubMed ID: 25369987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. False-Negative Rate of Papanicolaou Testing: A National Survey from the Thai Society of Cytology.
Koonmee S; Bychkov A; Shuangshoti S; Bhummichitra K; Himakhun W; Karalak A; Rangdaeng S
Acta Cytol; 2017; 61(6):434-440. PubMed ID: 28738387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of fluid-based, thin-layer processing and conventional Papanicolaou methods for uterine cervical cytology.
Wang TY; Chen HS; Yang YC; Tsou MC
J Formos Med Assoc; 1999 Jul; 98(7):500-5. PubMed ID: 10463000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical parameters associated with unsatisfactory specimens of conventional cervical smears.
Lu CH; Chang CC; Chang MC; Chen SJ; Jan YJ; Fu TF; Ho ES
Diagn Cytopathol; 2011 Feb; 39(2):87-91. PubMed ID: 20091895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
