114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28752611)
41. Clinical Factors Associated with Specimen Adequacy for Conventional Cervical Cytology in Thammasat University Hospital, Thailand.
Anantaworapot A; Manusook S; Tanprasertkul C; Lertvutivivat S; Chanthasenanont A; Bhamarapravatana K; Suwannarurk K
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2016; 17(9):4209-4212. PubMed ID: 27797219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. The unsatisfactory ThinPrep® Pap Test™: analysis of technical aspects, most common causes, and recommendations for improvement.
Rosa M; Pragasam P; Saremian J; Aoalin A; Graf W; Mohammadi A
Diagn Cytopathol; 2013 Jul; 41(7):588-94. PubMed ID: 22833404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Comparison of cytological and immunocytochemical methods for detecting apoptotic epithelial cells in cervicovaginal smears.
Donmez HG; Beksac MS
Diagn Cytopathol; 2019 Dec; 47(12):1277-1282. PubMed ID: 31576675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. External quality control of cervical cytopathology: interlaboratory variability.
Azara CZ; Manrique EJ; Alves de Souza NL; Rodrigues AR; Tavares SB; Amaral RG
Acta Cytol; 2013; 57(6):585-90. PubMed ID: 24107687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Glandular Lesions of the Cervix in Clinical Practice: A Cytology, Histology, and Human Papillomavirus Correlation Study From 2 Institutions.
Miller RA; Mody DR; Tams KC; Thrall MJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2015 Nov; 139(11):1431-6. PubMed ID: 25951104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and invasive carcinoma following the report of three negative Papanicolaou smears: screening failures or rapid progression?
Sherman ME; Kelly D
Mod Pathol; 1992 May; 5(3):337-42. PubMed ID: 1495939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Weekly rescreening of 10% of the total cervical Papanicolaou smears: a worthwhile quality assurance scheme.
Sampatanukul P; Wannakrairot P; Promprakob U; Yodavudh S; Anansiriprapa C
J Med Assoc Thai; 2004 Sep; 87 Suppl 2():S261-5. PubMed ID: 16083199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Taking a satisfactory cervical cytologic smear. Is it really an easy procedure?
Bar-Am A; Niv J; Segal A
Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(6):1781-4. PubMed ID: 9390141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Internal quality control indicators in cervical cytopathology of a university laboratory.
Cardoso Filho LI; Tavares SBN; Siqueira MLB; Dos Passos EN; Araújo NLAS; Martins JMA; Ribeiro AA; Dos Santos SHR
Cytopathology; 2018 Aug; 29(4):355-360. PubMed ID: 29893438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Liquid-based cytology for primary cervical cancer screening: a multi-centre study.
Monsonego J; Autillo-Touati A; Bergeron C; Dachez R; Liaras J; Saurel J; Zerat L; Chatelain P; Mottot C
Br J Cancer; 2001 Feb; 84(3):360-6. PubMed ID: 11161401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. The Significance of Glandular Cells on Conventional Cervicovaginal Smears: Experience from a Tertiary Care Hospital in Coastal India.
Suresh PK; Kini H; Minal J; Dhavalpure N; Basavaiah SH; Adiga DS; Maben L
Acta Cytol; 2017; 61(3):199-206. PubMed ID: 28538217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Assessment of cervicovaginal smear adequacy. The Bethesda System guidelines and reproducibility.
Spires SE; Banks ER; Weeks JA; Banks HW; Davey DD
Am J Clin Pathol; 1994 Sep; 102(3):354-9. PubMed ID: 8085560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. One hundred percent thorough quality control rescreening of liquid-based monolayers in cervicovaginal cytopathology.
Rowe LR; Marshall CJ; Bentz JS
Cancer; 2002 Dec; 96(6):325-9. PubMed ID: 12478679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. [Applicative aspects of liquid-based cytology in cervical cancer screening].
Liverani M; De Paola F; Danesi S; Fedriga R; Dalbuoni V; Agnoletti R; Amadori AR; Mirra F; Bonoli W; Saragoni L
Pathologica; 2006 Dec; 98(6):629-34. PubMed ID: 17285839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Cervical cleaning improves Pap smear quality.
Kotaska AJ; Matisic JP
CMAJ; 2003 Sep; 169(7):666-9. PubMed ID: 14517124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Adenocarcinomas in the cervicovaginal Papanicolaou smear: analysis of a 12-year experience.
Kim HS; Underwood D
Diagn Cytopathol; 1991; 7(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 2065563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Effects of the Bethesda System on the rate of unsatisfactory Pap smears in spontaneous cervical screening.
Morini N; Bucchi L; Naldoni C; Schincaglia P; Capacci N; Fantozzi V; Buzzi G
Tumori; 1996; 82(5):437-40. PubMed ID: 9063518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Cellular debris on negative liquid-based cytology cervicovaginal smears.
Nagamine M; Ichii R; Taira T; Teramukai S; Konishi E
Cytopathology; 2022 Nov; 33(6):725-731. PubMed ID: 35867812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. The effect of vaginal speculum lubrication on the rate of unsatisfactory cervical cytology diagnosis.
Amies AM; Miller L; Lee SK; Koutsky L
Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Nov; 100(5 Pt 1):889-92. PubMed ID: 12423848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Cervical smear adequacy: cellularity references were found to increase both interobserver agreement and unsatisfactory rate.
Moore D; Pugh-Cain D; Walker T
Cytopathology; 2009 Jun; 20(3):161-8. PubMed ID: 18713249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
