924 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28752811)
21. Self-Reported Usage, Functional Benefit, and Audiologic Characteristics of Cochlear Implant Patients Who Use a Contralateral Hearing Aid.
Neuman AC; Waltzman SB; Shapiro WH; Neukam JD; Zeman AM; Svirsky MA
Trends Hear; 2017 Jan; 21():2331216517699530. PubMed ID: 28351216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Pre- and Postoperative Binaural Unmasking for Bimodal Cochlear Implant Listeners.
Sheffield BM; Schuchman G; Bernstein JGW
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):554-567. PubMed ID: 28301390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Effects of interferer facing orientation on speech perception by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
Strelcyk O; Pentony S; Kalluri S; Edwards B
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1419-32. PubMed ID: 24606279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The Effect of Simulated Interaural Frequency Mismatch on Speech Understanding and Spatial Release From Masking.
Goupell MJ; Stoelb CA; Kan A; Litovsky RY
Ear Hear; 2018; 39(5):895-905. PubMed ID: 29337763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Simultaneous masking between electric and acoustic stimulation in cochlear implant users with residual low-frequency hearing.
Krüger B; Büchner A; Nogueira W
Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():185-196. PubMed ID: 28688755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Binaural advantages in users of bimodal and bilateral cochlear implant devices.
Kokkinakis K; Pak N
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jan; 135(1):EL47-53. PubMed ID: 24437856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Clinical outcomes with the Kanso™ off-the-ear cochlear implant sound processor.
Mauger SJ; Jones M; Nel E; Del Dot J
Int J Audiol; 2017 Apr; 56(4):267-276. PubMed ID: 28067077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Speech perception, localization, and lateralization with bilateral cochlear implants.
van Hoesel RJ; Tyler RS
J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Mar; 113(3):1617-30. PubMed ID: 12656396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The relationship between binaural benefit and difference in unilateral speech recognition performance for bilateral cochlear implant users.
Yoon YS; Li Y; Kang HY; Fu QJ
Int J Audiol; 2011 Aug; 50(8):554-65. PubMed ID: 21696329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Simulating the effect of interaural mismatch in the insertion depth of bilateral cochlear implants on speech perception.
van Besouw RM; Forrester L; Crowe ND; Rowan D
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):1348-57. PubMed ID: 23927131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Turn an Ear to Hear: How Hearing-Impaired Listeners Can Exploit Head Orientation to Enhance Their Speech Intelligibility in Noisy Social Settings.
Grange JA; Culling JF; Bardsley B; Mackinney LI; Hughes SE; Backhouse SS
Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518802701. PubMed ID: 30334495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Factors constraining the benefit to speech understanding of combining information from low-frequency hearing and a cochlear implant.
Dorman MF; Cook S; Spahr A; Zhang T; Loiselle L; Schramm D; Whittingham J; Gifford R
Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():107-11. PubMed ID: 25285624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Utility of bilateral acoustic hearing in combination with electrical stimulation provided by the cochlear implant.
Plant K; Babic L
Int J Audiol; 2016; 55 Suppl 2():S31-8. PubMed ID: 26987051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Objective measure of binaural processing: Acoustic change complex in response to interaural phase differences.
Fan Y; Gifford RH
Hear Res; 2024 Jul; 448():109020. PubMed ID: 38763034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The effect of different cochlear implant microphones on acoustic hearing individuals' binaural benefits for speech perception in noise.
Aronoff JM; Freed DJ; Fisher LM; Pal I; Soli SD
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):468-84. PubMed ID: 21412155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparing sound localization deficits in bilateral cochlear-implant users and vocoder simulations with normal-hearing listeners.
Jones H; Kan A; Litovsky RY
Trends Hear; 2014 Nov; 18():. PubMed ID: 25385244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Pupillometry Reveals That Context Benefit in Speech Perception Can Be Disrupted by Later-Occurring Sounds, Especially in Listeners With Cochlear Implants.
Winn MB; Moore AN
Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518808962. PubMed ID: 30375282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Avoiding disconnection: An evaluation of telephone options for cochlear implant users.
Marcrum SC; Picou EM; Steffens T
Int J Audiol; 2017 Mar; 56(3):186-193. PubMed ID: 27809627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Contralateral Interference Caused by Binaurally Presented Competing Speech in Adult Bilateral Cochlear-Implant Users.
Goupell MJ; Stakhovskaya OA; Bernstein JGW
Ear Hear; 2018; 39(1):110-123. PubMed ID: 28787316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Effect of Tinnitus and Duration of Deafness on Sound Localization and Speech Recognition in Noise in Patients With Single-Sided Deafness.
Liu YW; Cheng X; Chen B; Peng K; Ishiyama A; Fu QJ
Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518813802. PubMed ID: 30509148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
