928 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28752811)
41. Cochlear Implant Facilitates the Use of Talker Sex and Spatial Cues to Segregate Competing Speech in Unilaterally Deaf Listeners.
Chen J; Shi Y; Kong Y; Chen B; Zhang L; Galvin JJ; Li Y; Fu QJ
Ear Hear; 2023 Jan-Feb 01; 44(1):77-91. PubMed ID: 35733275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. A Binaural Cochlear Implant Sound Coding Strategy Inspired by the Contralateral Medial Olivocochlear Reflex.
Lopez-Poveda EA; Eustaquio-Martín A; Stohl JS; Wolford RD; Schatzer R; Wilson BS
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(3):e138-48. PubMed ID: 26862711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. European multi-centre study of the Nucleus Hybrid L24 cochlear implant.
Lenarz T; James C; Cuda D; Fitzgerald O'Connor A; Frachet B; Frijns JH; Klenzner T; Laszig R; Manrique M; Marx M; Merkus P; Mylanus EA; Offeciers E; Pesch J; Ramos-Macias A; Robier A; Sterkers O; Uziel A
Int J Audiol; 2013 Dec; 52(12):838-48. PubMed ID: 23992489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Spatial hearing benefits demonstrated with presentation of acoustic temporal fine structure cues in bilateral cochlear implant listeners.
Churchill TH; Kan A; Goupell MJ; Litovsky RY
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Sep; 136(3):1246. PubMed ID: 25190398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Sound-direction identification, interaural time delay discrimination, and speech intelligibility advantages in noise for a bilateral cochlear implant user.
Van Hoesel R; Ramsden R; Odriscoll M
Ear Hear; 2002 Apr; 23(2):137-49. PubMed ID: 11951849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Contralateral suppression of human hearing sensitivity in single-sided deaf cochlear implant users.
Nogueira W; Krüger B; Büchner A; Lopez-Poveda E
Hear Res; 2019 Mar; 373():121-129. PubMed ID: 29941311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Fundamental frequency is critical to speech perception in noise in combined acoustic and electric hearing.
Carroll J; Tiaden S; Zeng FG
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Oct; 130(4):2054-62. PubMed ID: 21973360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Voice gender differences and separation of simultaneous talkers in cochlear implant users with residual hearing.
Visram AS; Kluk K; McKay CM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):EL135-41. PubMed ID: 22894312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. The effects of reverberant self- and overlap-masking on speech recognition in cochlear implant listeners.
Desmond JM; Collins LM; Throckmorton CS
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jun; 135(6):EL304-10. PubMed ID: 24907838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Psychoacoustic and phoneme identification measures in cochlear-implant and normal-hearing listeners.
Goldsworthy RL; Delhorne LA; Braida LD; Reed CM
Trends Amplif; 2013 Mar; 17(1):27-44. PubMed ID: 23429419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Binaural unmasking with multiple adjacent masking electrodes in bilateral cochlear implant users.
Lu T; Litovsky R; Zeng FG
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jun; 129(6):3934-45. PubMed ID: 21682415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Development and validation of the Leuven intelligibility sentence test with male speaker (LIST-m).
Jansen S; Koning R; Wouters J; van Wieringen A
Int J Audiol; 2014 Jan; 53(1):55-9. PubMed ID: 24152309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Rate and onset cues can improve cochlear implant synthetic vowel recognition in noise.
Mc Laughlin M; Reilly RB; Zeng FG
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Mar; 133(3):1546-60. PubMed ID: 23464025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Binaural Perception in Single-Sided Deaf Cochlear Implant Users with Unrestricted or Restricted Acoustic Hearing in the Non-Implanted Ear.
Dorbeau C; Galvin J; Fu QJ; Legris E; Marx M; Bakhos D
Audiol Neurootol; 2018; 23(3):187-197. PubMed ID: 30352440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. The effect of simulated unilateral hearing loss on horizontal sound localization accuracy and recognition of speech in spatially separate competing speech.
Asp F; Jakobsson AM; Berninger E
Hear Res; 2018 Jan; 357():54-63. PubMed ID: 29190488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Top-down restoration of speech in cochlear-implant users.
Bhargava P; Gaudrain E; Başkent D
Hear Res; 2014 Mar; 309():113-23. PubMed ID: 24368138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Perceptual benefit and functional outcomes for children using sequential bilateral cochlear implants.
Galvin KL; Mok M; Dowell RC
Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):470-82. PubMed ID: 17609610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Availability of binaural cues for bilateral implant recipients and bimodal listeners with and without preserved hearing in the implanted ear.
Gifford RH; Dorman MF; Sheffield SW; Teece K; Olund AP
Audiol Neurootol; 2014; 19(1):57-71. PubMed ID: 24356514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Speech recognition outcomes following bilateral cochlear implantation in adults aged over 50 years old.
Boisvert I; McMahon CM; Dowell RC
Int J Audiol; 2016; 55 Suppl 2():S39-44. PubMed ID: 27049835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Importance of age and postimplantation experience on speech perception measures in children with sequential bilateral cochlear implants.
Peters BR; Litovsky R; Parkinson A; Lake J
Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):649-57. PubMed ID: 17712290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
