721 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28753777)
1. Elastic Versus Rigid Image Registration in Magnetic Resonance Imaging-transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Prostate Biopsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Venderink W; de Rooij M; Sedelaar JPM; Huisman HJ; Fütterer JJ
Eur Urol Focus; 2018 Mar; 4(2):219-227. PubMed ID: 28753777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparing Three Different Techniques for Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Prostate Biopsies: A Systematic Review of In-bore versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging-transrectal Ultrasound fusion versus Cognitive Registration. Is There a Preferred Technique?
Wegelin O; van Melick HHE; Hooft L; Bosch JLHR; Reitsma HB; Barentsz JO; Somford DM
Eur Urol; 2017 Apr; 71(4):517-531. PubMed ID: 27568655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy may enhance the diagnostic accuracy of significant prostate cancer detection compared to standard transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Schoots IG; Roobol MJ; Nieboer D; Bangma CH; Steyerberg EW; Hunink MG
Eur Urol; 2015 Sep; 68(3):438-50. PubMed ID: 25480312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound fusion image-guided prostate biopsy: Current status of the cancer detection and the prospects of tailor-made medicine of the prostate cancer.
Shoji S
Investig Clin Urol; 2019 Jan; 60(1):4-13. PubMed ID: 30637355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Is targeted magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy enough for the detection of prostate cancer in patients with PI-RADS ≥3: Results of a prospective, randomized clinical trial.
Zhang J; Zhu A; Sun D; Guo S; Zhang H; Liu S; Fu Q; Zhang K
J Cancer Res Ther; 2020; 16(7):1698-1702. PubMed ID: 33565519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The FUTURE Trial: A Multicenter Randomised Controlled Trial on Target Biopsy Techniques Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer in Patients with Prior Negative Biopsies.
Wegelin O; Exterkate L; van der Leest M; Kummer JA; Vreuls W; de Bruin PC; Bosch JLHR; Barentsz JO; Somford DM; van Melick HHE
Eur Urol; 2019 Apr; 75(4):582-590. PubMed ID: 30522912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-stratified Clinical Pathways and Systematic Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Biopsy Pathway for the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Woo S; Suh CH; Eastham JA; Zelefsky MJ; Morris MJ; Abida W; Scher HI; Sidlow R; Becker AS; Wibmer AG; Hricak H; Vargas HA
Eur Urol Oncol; 2019 Nov; 2(6):605-616. PubMed ID: 31204311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of Cancer Detection Rates Between TRUS-Guided Biopsy and MRI-Targeted Biopsy According to PSA Level in Biopsy-Naive Patients: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.
Choi YH; Kang MY; Sung HH; Jeon HG; Chang Jeong B; Seo SI; Jeon SS; Kim CK; Park BK; Lee HM
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2019 Feb; 17(1):e19-e25. PubMed ID: 30415878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prospective randomized trial comparing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided in-bore biopsy to MRI-ultrasound fusion and transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy in patients with prior negative biopsies.
Arsov C; Rabenalt R; Blondin D; Quentin M; Hiester A; Godehardt E; Gabbert HE; Becker N; Antoch G; Albers P; Schimmöller L
Eur Urol; 2015 Oct; 68(4):713-20. PubMed ID: 26116294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Not All Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsies Are Equal: The Impact of the Type of Approach and Operator Expertise on the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
Stabile A; Dell'Oglio P; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Brembilla G; Cristel G; Dehò F; Scattoni V; Maga T; Losa A; Gaboardi F; Cardone G; Esposito A; De Cobelli F; Del Maschio A; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Jun; 1(2):120-128. PubMed ID: 31100235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A Randomized Controlled Trial To Assess and Compare the Outcomes of Two-core Prostate Biopsy Guided by Fused Magnetic Resonance and Transrectal Ultrasound Images and Traditional 12-core Systematic Biopsy.
Baco E; Rud E; Eri LM; Moen G; Vlatkovic L; Svindland A; Eggesbø HB; Ukimura O
Eur Urol; 2016 Jan; 69(1):149-56. PubMed ID: 25862143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prebiopsy Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis in Biopsy-naive Men with Suspected Prostate Cancer Based on Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen Values: Results from a Randomized Prospective Blinded Controlled Trial.
Tonttila PP; Lantto J; Pääkkö E; Piippo U; Kauppila S; Lammentausta E; Ohtonen P; Vaarala MH
Eur Urol; 2016 Mar; 69(3):419-25. PubMed ID: 26033153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Retrospective comparison of direct in-bore magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided biopsy and fusion-guided biopsy in patients with MRI lesions which are likely or highly likely to be clinically significant prostate cancer.
Venderink W; van der Leest M; van Luijtelaar A; van de Ven WJM; Fütterer JJ; Sedelaar JPM; Huisman HJ
World J Urol; 2017 Dec; 35(12):1849-1855. PubMed ID: 28871396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion-guided Transperineal Versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion-guided Transrectal Prostate Biopsy-A Systematic Review.
Rai BP; Mayerhofer C; Somani BK; Kallidonis P; Nagele U; Tokas T
Eur Urol Oncol; 2021 Dec; 4(6):904-913. PubMed ID: 33478936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Magnetic Resonance Imaging-guided In-bore and Magnetic Resonance Imaging-transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Prostate Biopsies: An Adjusted Comparison of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection Rate.
Costa DN; Goldberg K; Leon AD; Lotan Y; Xi Y; Aziz M; Freifeld Y; Margulis V; Raj G; Roehrborn CG; Hornberger B; Desai N; Bagrodia A; Francis F; Pedrosa I; Cadeddu JA
Eur Urol Oncol; 2019 Jul; 2(4):397-404. PubMed ID: 31277776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Targeted MRI/TRUS fusion-guided biopsy in men with previous prostate biopsies using a novel registration software and multiparametric MRI PI-RADS scores: first results.
Tewes S; Hueper K; Hartung D; Imkamp F; Herrmann TR; Weidemann J; Renckly S; Kuczyk MA; Wacker F; Peters I
World J Urol; 2015 Nov; 33(11):1707-14. PubMed ID: 25774003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy techniques compared to transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy of the prostate: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Bass EJ; Pantovic A; Connor MJ; Loeb S; Rastinehad AR; Winkler M; Gabe R; Ahmed HU
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2022 Feb; 25(2):174-179. PubMed ID: 34548624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of complications rates between multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) fusion and systematic TRUS prostatic biopsies.
Queiroz MRG; Falsarella PM; Mariotti GC; Lemos GC; Baroni RH; Mussi TC; Garcia RG
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Feb; 44(2):732-738. PubMed ID: 30255444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of prostate cancer detection rates in patients undergoing MRI/TRUS fusion prostate biopsy with two different software-based systems.
Hanske J; Risse Y; Roghmann F; Pucheril D; Berg S; Tully KH; von Landenberg N; Wald J; Noldus J; Brock M
Prostate; 2022 Feb; 82(2):227-234. PubMed ID: 34734428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Real-time MRI/US fusion-guided biopsy in biopsy-naïve and pre-biopsied patients with suspicion for prostate cancer].
Maxeiner A; Stephan C; Fischer T; Durmus T; Kilic E; Asbach P; Haas M; Günzel K; Neymeyer J; Miller K; Cash H
Aktuelle Urol; 2015 Jan; 46(1):34-8. PubMed ID: 25519051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
