392 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28753811)
1. Risk of Upgrading and Upstaging Among 10 000 Patients with Gleason 3+4 Favorable Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer.
Yang DD; Mahal BA; Muralidhar V; Nezolosky MD; Vastola ME; Labe SA; Boldbaatar N; King MT; Martin NE; Orio PF; Beard CJ; Hoffman KE; Trinh QD; Spratt DE; Feng FY; Nguyen PL
Eur Urol Focus; 2019 Jan; 5(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 28753811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pathologic Outcomes of Gleason 6 Favorable Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer Treated With Radical Prostatectomy: Implications for Active Surveillance.
Yang DD; Mahal BA; Muralidhar V; Vastola ME; Boldbaatar N; Labe SA; Nezolosky MD; Orio PF; King MT; Martin NE; Mouw KW; Trinh QD; Nguyen PL
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2018 Jun; 16(3):226-234. PubMed ID: 29196209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Adverse Disease Features in Gleason Score 3 + 4 "Favorable Intermediate-Risk" Prostate Cancer: Implications for Active Surveillance.
Morlacco A; Cheville JC; Rangel LJ; Gearman DJ; Karnes RJ
Eur Urol; 2017 Sep; 72(3):442-447. PubMed ID: 27574819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Incidence and Predictors of Upgrading and Up Staging among 10,000 Contemporary Patients with Low Risk Prostate Cancer.
Dinh KT; Mahal BA; Ziehr DR; Muralidhar V; Chen YW; Viswanathan VB; Nezolosky MD; Beard CJ; Choueiri TK; Martin NE; Orio PF; Sweeney CJ; Trinh QD; Nguyen PL
J Urol; 2015 Aug; 194(2):343-9. PubMed ID: 25681290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prostate-specific antigen vs prostate-specific antigen density as a predictor of upgrading in men diagnosed with Gleason 6 prostate cancer by contemporary multicore prostate biopsy.
Oh JJ; Hong SK; Lee JK; Lee BK; Lee S; Kwon OS; Byun SS; Lee SE
BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11 Pt B):E494-9. PubMed ID: 22540236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Heterogeneity in D'Amico classification-based low-risk prostate cancer: Differences in upgrading and upstaging according to active surveillance eligibility.
Schiffmann J; Wenzel P; Salomon G; Budäus L; Schlomm T; Minner S; Wittmer C; Kraft S; Krech T; Steurer S; Sauter G; Beyer B; Boehm K; Tilki D; Michl U; Huland H; Graefen M; Karakiewicz PI
Urol Oncol; 2015 Jul; 33(7):329.e13-9. PubMed ID: 25960411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The ability of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density to predict an upgrade in Gleason score between initial prostate biopsy and prostatectomy diminishes with increasing tumour grade due to reduced PSA secretion per unit tumour volume.
Corcoran NM; Casey RG; Hong MK; Pedersen J; Connolly S; Peters J; Harewood L; Gleave ME; Costello AJ; Hovens CM; Goldenberg SL
BJU Int; 2012 Jul; 110(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 22085203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. No detrimental effect of a positive family history on postoperative upgrading and upstaging in men with low risk and favourable intermediate-risk prostate cancer: implications for active surveillance.
Herkommer K; Maier N; Ankerst DP; Schiele S; Gschwend JE; Meissner VH
World J Urol; 2021 Jul; 39(7):2499-2506. PubMed ID: 33048258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Risk of Pathologic Upgrading or Locally Advanced Disease in Early Prostate Cancer Patients Based on Biopsy Gleason Score and PSA: A Population-Based Study of Modern Patients.
Caster JM; Falchook AD; Hendrix LH; Chen RC
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2015 Jun; 92(2):244-51. PubMed ID: 25841621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Utility of Gleason pattern 4 morphologies detected on transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsies for prediction of upgrading or upstaging in Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer.
Flood TA; Schieda N; Keefe DT; Breau RH; Morash C; Hogan K; Belanger EC; Mai KT; Robertson SJ
Virchows Arch; 2016 Sep; 469(3):313-9. PubMed ID: 27394432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Advancing Age and the Odds of Upgrading and Upstaging at Radical Prostatectomy in Men with Gleason Score 6 Prostate Cancer.
Leeman JE; Chen MH; Huland H; Graefen M; D'Amico AV; Tilki D
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2019 Dec; 17(6):e1116-e1121. PubMed ID: 31601512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cribriform morphology predicts upstaging after radical prostatectomy in patients with Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer at transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided needle biopsy.
Keefe DT; Schieda N; El Hallani S; Breau RH; Morash C; Robertson SJ; Mai KT; Belanger EC; Flood TA
Virchows Arch; 2015 Oct; 467(4):437-42. PubMed ID: 26229020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Population based study of predictors of adverse pathology among candidates for active surveillance with Gleason 6 prostate cancer.
Vellekoop A; Loeb S; Folkvaljon Y; Stattin P
J Urol; 2014 Feb; 191(2):350-7. PubMed ID: 24071481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Multiple Tissue Biomarkers Independently and Additively Predict Prostate Cancer Pathology Outcomes.
Cooperberg MR; Cowan JE; Lindquist KJ; Kobayashi Y; Simko JP; Bengtsson H; Singh K; Ngo V; Avila A; Newcomb LF; Tretriakova M; Lin DW; Stone S; Carroll PR; Paris PL
Eur Urol; 2021 Jan; 79(1):141-149. PubMed ID: 33148472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Non-organ confined stage and upgrading rates in exclusive PSA high-risk prostate cancer patients.
Hoeh B; Flammia RS; Hohenhorst L; Sorce G; Chierigo F; Tian Z; Saad F; Gallucci M; Briganti A; Terrone C; Shariat SF; Graefen M; Tilki D; Kluth LA; Mandel P; Becker A; Chun FKH; Karakiewicz PI
Prostate; 2022 May; 82(6):687-694. PubMed ID: 35188982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The impact of pretreatment PSA on risk stratification in men with Gleason 6 prostate cancer: Implications for active surveillance.
Monfared S; Fleishman A; Korets R; Chang P; Wagner A; Bubley G; Kaplan I; Olumi AF; Gershman B
Urol Oncol; 2021 Nov; 39(11):783.e21-783.e30. PubMed ID: 33992521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Decade of Active Surveillance in the PRIAS Study: An Update and Evaluation of the Criteria Used to Recommend a Switch to Active Treatment.
Bokhorst LP; Valdagni R; Rannikko A; Kakehi Y; Pickles T; Bangma CH; Roobol MJ;
Eur Urol; 2016 Dec; 70(6):954-960. PubMed ID: 27329565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Primary Gleason pattern upgrading in contemporary patients with D'Amico low-risk prostate cancer: implications for future biomarkers and imaging modalities.
Leyh-Bannurah SR; Abou-Haidar H; Dell'Oglio P; Schiffmann J; Tian Z; Heinzer H; Huland H; Graefen M; Budäus L; Karakiewicz PI
BJU Int; 2017 May; 119(5):692-699. PubMed ID: 27367469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Risk-stratification based on magnetic resonance imaging and prostate-specific antigen density may reduce unnecessary follow-up biopsy procedures in men on active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer.
Alberts AR; Roobol MJ; Drost FH; van Leenders GJ; Bokhorst LP; Bangma CH; Schoots IG
BJU Int; 2017 Oct; 120(4):511-519. PubMed ID: 28267899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Value of Serial Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Magnetic Resonance Imaging-guided Biopsies in Men with Low-risk Prostate Cancer on Active Surveillance After 1 Yr Follow-up.
Hamoen EHJ; Hoeks CMA; Somford DM; van Oort IM; Vergunst H; Oddens JR; Smits GA; Bokhorst LP; Witjes JA; Rovers MM; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA; Barentsz JO
Eur Urol Focus; 2019 May; 5(3):407-415. PubMed ID: 29331622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
