These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28753838)
41. Risk factors for clinical metastasis in men undergoing radical prostatectomy and immediate adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy. Taguchi S; Fukuhara H; Kakutani S; Takeshima Y; Miyazaki H; Suzuki M; Fujimura T; Nakagawa T; Igawa Y; Kume H; Homma Y Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(24):10729-33. PubMed ID: 25605166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Contemporary grading for prostate cancer: implications for patient care. Brimo F; Montironi R; Egevad L; Erbersdobler A; Lin DW; Nelson JB; Rubin MA; van der Kwast T; Amin M; Epstein JI Eur Urol; 2013 May; 63(5):892-901. PubMed ID: 23092544 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Prostate-specific antigen level, stage or Gleason score: which is best for predicting outcomes after radical prostatectomy, and does it vary by the outcome being measured? Results from Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital database. Mithal P; Howard LE; Aronson WJ; Kane CJ; Cooperberg MR; Terris MK; Amling CL; Freedland SJ Int J Urol; 2015 Apr; 22(4):362-6. PubMed ID: 25728968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Long-term follow-up of patients with prostate cancer and nodal metastases treated by pelvic lymphadenectomy and radical prostatectomy: the positive impact of adjuvant radiotherapy. Da Pozzo LF; Cozzarini C; Briganti A; Suardi N; Salonia A; Bertini R; Gallina A; Bianchi M; Fantini GV; Bolognesi A; Fazio F; Montorsi F; Rigatti P Eur Urol; 2009 May; 55(5):1003-11. PubMed ID: 19211184 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Performance of a Prostate Cancer Genomic Classifier in Predicting Metastasis in Men with Prostate-specific Antigen Persistence Postprostatectomy. Spratt DE; Dai DLY; Den RB; Troncoso P; Yousefi K; Ross AE; Schaeffer EM; Haddad Z; Davicioni E; Mehra R; Morgan TM; Rayford W; Abdollah F; Trabulsi E; Achim M; Tapia ELN; Guerrero M; Karnes RJ; Dicker AP; Hurwitz MA; Nguyen PL; Feng FFY; Freedland SJ; Davis JW Eur Urol; 2018 Jul; 74(1):107-114. PubMed ID: 29233664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. The extent of pelvic lymph node dissection correlates with the biochemical recurrence rate in patients with intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer. Schiavina R; Manferrari F; Garofalo M; Bertaccini A; Vagnoni V; Guidi M; Borghesi M; Baccos A; Morselli-Labate AM; Concetti S; Martorana G BJU Int; 2011 Oct; 108(8):1262-8. PubMed ID: 21446934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer defined by preoperative criteria: oncologic follow-up in national multicenter study in 813 patients and assessment of easy-to-use prognostic substratification. Ploussard G; Masson-Lecomte A; Beauval JB; Ouzzane A; Bonniol R; Buge F; Fadli S; Rouprêt M; Rebillard X; Gaschignard N; Pfister C; Villers A; Soulié M; Salomon L; Urology; 2011 Sep; 78(3):607-13. PubMed ID: 21783233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Docetaxel Versus Surveillance After Radical Prostatectomy for High-risk Prostate Cancer: Results from the Prospective Randomised, Open-label Phase 3 Scandinavian Prostate Cancer Group 12 Trial. Ahlgren GM; Flodgren P; Tammela TLJ; Kellokumpu-Lehtinen P; Borre M; Angelsen A; Iversen JR; Sverrisdottir A; Jonsson E; Sengelov L; Eur Urol; 2018 Jun; 73(6):870-876. PubMed ID: 29395502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Yonsei nomogram to predict lymph node invasion in Asian men with prostate cancer during robotic era. Kim KH; Lim SK; Kim HY; Han WK; Choi YD; Chung BH; Hong SJ; Rha KH BJU Int; 2014 Apr; 113(4):598-604. PubMed ID: 24006951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Identifying the Most Informative Prediction Tool for Cancer-specific Mortality After Radical Prostatectomy: Comparative Analysis of Three Commonly Used Preoperative Prediction Models. Boehm K; Larcher A; Beyer B; Tian Z; Tilki D; Steuber T; Karakiewicz PI; Heinzer H; Graefen M; Budäus L Eur Urol; 2016 Jun; 69(6):1038-43. PubMed ID: 26272236 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Improved biochemical outcome with adjuvant radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer with poor pathologic features. Vargas C; Kestin LL; Weed DW; Krauss D; Vicini FA; Martinez AA Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Mar; 61(3):714-24. PubMed ID: 15708249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Predicting pathological outcomes in patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer: a preoperative nomogram. Abdollah F; Klett DE; Sood A; Sammon JD; Pucheril D; Dalela D; Diaz M; Peabody JO; Trinh QD; Menon M BJU Int; 2015 Nov; 116(5):703-12. PubMed ID: 25413443 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Lymph node yield during radical prostatectomy does not impact rate of biochemical recurrence in patients with seminal vesicle invasion and node-negative disease. Badani KK; Reddy BN; Moskowitz EJ; Paulucci DJ; Beksac AT; Martini A; Whalen MJ; Skarecky DW; Huynh LM; Ahlering TE Urol Oncol; 2018 Jun; 36(6):310.e1-310.e6. PubMed ID: 29625782 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Algorithm for selecting men for pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) during radical prostatectomy based on clinical risk factors in an Australian population. Sengupta S; Weerakoon M; Sethi K; Ischia J; Webb DR BJU Int; 2012 Apr; 109 Suppl 3():48-51. PubMed ID: 22458494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Updated nomogram predicting lymph node invasion in patients with prostate cancer undergoing extended pelvic lymph node dissection: the essential importance of percentage of positive cores. Briganti A; Larcher A; Abdollah F; Capitanio U; Gallina A; Suardi N; Bianchi M; Sun M; Freschi M; Salonia A; Karakiewicz PI; Rigatti P; Montorsi F Eur Urol; 2012 Mar; 61(3):480-7. PubMed ID: 22078338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Very long-term survival patterns of young patients treated with radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer. Dell'Oglio P; Karnes RJ; Joniau S; Spahn M; Gontero P; Tosco L; Fossati N; Kneitz B; Chlosta P; Graefen M; Marchioro G; Bianchi M; Sanchez-Salas R; Karakiewicz PI; Poppel HV; Montorsi F; Briganti A; Urol Oncol; 2016 May; 34(5):234.e13-9. PubMed ID: 26706120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Predictive postoperative model for biochemical recurrence in patients with localized prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy as monotherapy. Molina Escudero R; Herranz-Amo F; Paez-Borda A; Hernandez Fernandez C Arch Esp Urol; 2014 Apr; 67(3):259-67. PubMed ID: 24840591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Improved decision making in intermediate-risk prostate cancer: a multicenter study on pathologic and oncologic outcomes after radical prostatectomy. Beauval JB; Ploussard G; Cabarrou B; Roumiguié M; Ouzzane A; Gas J; Goujon A; Marcq G; Mathieu R; Vincendeau S; Cathelineau X; Mongiat-Artus P; Salomon L; Soulié M; Méjean A; de La Taille A; Rouprêt M; Rozet F; World J Urol; 2017 Aug; 35(8):1191-1197. PubMed ID: 27987030 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Combination of adjuvant hormonal and radiation therapy significantly prolongs survival of patients with pT2-4 pN+ prostate cancer: results of a matched analysis. Briganti A; Karnes RJ; Da Pozzo LF; Cozzarini C; Capitanio U; Gallina A; Suardi N; Bianchi M; Tutolo M; Salonia A; Di Muzio N; Rigatti P; Montorsi F; Blute M Eur Urol; 2011 May; 59(5):832-40. PubMed ID: 21354694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Evaluation of prognostic factors after radical prostatectomy in pT3b prostate cancer patients in Japanese population. Inoue T; Kinoshita H; Terada N; Kobayashi T; Yamasaki T; Matsui Y; Kamba T; Inui H; Sugi M; Matsuda T; Ogawa O Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2015 Aug; 45(8):780-4. PubMed ID: 25981623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]