315 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28753891)
1. Evaluation of Prostate HistoScanning as a Method for Targeted Biopsy in Routine Practice.
Glybochko PV; Alyaev YG; Amosov AV; Krupinov GE; Nir D; Winkler M; Ganzha TM
Eur Urol Focus; 2019 Mar; 5(2):179-185. PubMed ID: 28753891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prostate histoscanning true targeting guided prostate biopsy: initial clinical experience.
Sivaraman A; Sanchez-Salas R; Barret E; Macek P; Validire P; Galiano M; Rozet F; Cathelineau X
World J Urol; 2015 Oct; 33(10):1475-9. PubMed ID: 25501797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A Prospective Comparison of Selective Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fusion-Targeted and Systematic Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Biopsies for Detecting Prostate Cancer in Men Undergoing Repeated Biopsies.
Boesen L; Nørgaard N; Løgager V; Balslev I; Thomsen HS
Urol Int; 2017; 99(4):384-391. PubMed ID: 28651247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Early experience with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsies under visual transrectal ultrasound guidance in patients suspicious for prostate cancer undergoing repeated biopsy.
Boesen L; Noergaard N; Chabanova E; Logager V; Balslev I; Mikines K; Thomsen HS
Scand J Urol; 2015 Feb; 49(1):25-34. PubMed ID: 24922550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prospective randomized trial comparing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided in-bore biopsy to MRI-ultrasound fusion and transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy in patients with prior negative biopsies.
Arsov C; Rabenalt R; Blondin D; Quentin M; Hiester A; Godehardt E; Gabbert HE; Becker N; Antoch G; Albers P; Schimmöller L
Eur Urol; 2015 Oct; 68(4):713-20. PubMed ID: 26116294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound-fusion biopsy significantly upgrades prostate cancer versus systematic 12-core transrectal ultrasound biopsy.
Siddiqui MM; Rais-Bahrami S; Truong H; Stamatakis L; Vourganti S; Nix J; Hoang AN; Walton-Diaz A; Shuch B; Weintraub M; Kruecker J; Amalou H; Turkbey B; Merino MJ; Choyke PL; Wood BJ; Pinto PA
Eur Urol; 2013 Nov; 64(5):713-719. PubMed ID: 23787357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. MRI/US fusion-guided prostate biopsy allows for equivalent cancer detection with significantly fewer needle cores in biopsy-naive men.
Yarlagadda VK; Lai WS; Gordetsky JB; Porter KK; Nix JW; Thomas JV; Rais-Bahrami S
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2018; 24(3):115-120. PubMed ID: 29770762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Multiparametric MRI in detection and staging of prostate cancer.
Boesen L
Dan Med J; 2017 Feb; 64(2):. PubMed ID: 28157066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Computer-aided transrectal ultrasound: does prostate HistoScanning™ improve detection performance of prostate cancer in repeat biopsies?
Hamann MF; Hamann C; Trettel A; Jünemann KP; Naumann CM
BMC Urol; 2015 Jul; 15():76. PubMed ID: 26223353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Association Between Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Score for the Index Lesion and Multifocal, Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
Stabile A; Dell'Oglio P; De Cobelli F; Esposito A; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Brembilla G; Cristel G; Cardone G; Deho' F; Losa A; Suardi N; Gaboardi F; Del Maschio A; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 May; 1(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 31100225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound fusion-targeted prostate biopsy using three-dimensional ultrasound-based organ-tracking technology: Initial experience in Japan.
Yamada Y; Fujihara A; Shiraishi T; Ueda T; Yamada T; Ueno A; Inoue Y; Kaneko M; Kamoi K; Hongo F; Okihara K; Ukimura O
Int J Urol; 2019 May; 26(5):544-549. PubMed ID: 30793385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Computer-aided (HistoScanning) biopsies versus conventional transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsies: do targeted biopsy schemes improve the cancer detection rate?
Hamann MF; Hamann C; Schenk E; Al-Najar A; Naumann CM; Jünemann KP
Urology; 2013 Feb; 81(2):370-5. PubMed ID: 23374806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prospective evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging guided in-bore prostate biopsy versus systematic transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy in biopsy naïve men with elevated prostate specific antigen.
Quentin M; Blondin D; Arsov C; Schimmöller L; Hiester A; Godehardt E; Albers P; Antoch G; Rabenalt R
J Urol; 2014 Nov; 192(5):1374-9. PubMed ID: 24866597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Critical evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging targeted, transrectal ultrasound guided transperineal fusion biopsy for detection of prostate cancer.
Kuru TH; Roethke MC; Seidenader J; Simpfendörfer T; Boxler S; Alammar K; Rieker P; Popeneciu VI; Roth W; Pahernik S; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
J Urol; 2013 Oct; 190(4):1380-6. PubMed ID: 23608676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Risk-based Patient Selection for Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Prostate Biopsy after Negative Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Random Biopsy Avoids Unnecessary Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scans.
Alberts AR; Schoots IG; Bokhorst LP; van Leenders GJ; Bangma CH; Roobol MJ
Eur Urol; 2016 Jun; 69(6):1129-34. PubMed ID: 26651990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy may enhance the diagnostic accuracy of significant prostate cancer detection compared to standard transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Schoots IG; Roobol MJ; Nieboer D; Bangma CH; Steyerberg EW; Hunink MG
Eur Urol; 2015 Sep; 68(3):438-50. PubMed ID: 25480312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prospective study of diagnostic accuracy comparing prostate cancer detection by transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy versus magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with subsequent MR-guided biopsy in men without previous prostate biopsies.
Pokorny MR; de Rooij M; Duncan E; Schröder FH; Parkinson R; Barentsz JO; Thompson LC
Eur Urol; 2014 Jul; 66(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 24666839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prostate Cancer Risk Assessment in Biopsy-naïve Patients: The Rotterdam Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator in Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Transrectal Ultrasound (TRUS) Fusion Biopsy and Systematic TRUS Biopsy.
Mannaerts CK; Gayet M; Verbeek JF; Engelbrecht MRW; Savci-Heijink CD; Jager GJ; Gielens MPM; van der Linden H; Beerlage HP; de Reijke TM; Wijkstra H; Roobol MJ
Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Jun; 1(2):109-117. PubMed ID: 31100233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Why and Where do We Miss Significant Prostate Cancer with Multi-parametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging followed by Magnetic Resonance-guided and Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Biopsy in Biopsy-naïve Men?
Schouten MG; van der Leest M; Pokorny M; Hoogenboom M; Barentsz JO; Thompson LC; Fütterer JJ
Eur Urol; 2017 Jun; 71(6):896-903. PubMed ID: 28063613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Prostate Biopsy-Are 2 Biopsy Cores per Magnetic Resonance Imaging Lesion Required?
Dimitroulis P; Rabenalt R; Nini A; Hiester A; Esposito I; Schimmöller L; Antoch G; Albers P; Arsov C
J Urol; 2018 Nov; 200(5):1030-1034. PubMed ID: 29733837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
